Skip to main content
Dryad logo

Data from: Quantitative acoustic differentiation of cryptic species illustrated with King and Clapper rails

Citation

Stiffler, Lydia L. et al. (2018), Data from: Quantitative acoustic differentiation of cryptic species illustrated with King and Clapper rails, Dryad, Dataset, https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.r475hr3

Abstract

Reliable species identification is vital for survey and monitoring programs. Recently, the development of digital technology for recording and analyzing vocalizations has assisted in acoustic surveying for cryptic, rare, or elusive species. However, the quantitative tools that exist for species differentiation are still being refined. Using vocalizations recorded in the course of ecological studies of a King Rail (Rallus elegans) and a Clapper Rail (R. crepitans) population, we assessed the accuracy and effectiveness of three parametric (logistic regression, discriminant function analysis, quadratic discriminant function analysis) and six nonparametric (support vector machine, CART, Random Forest, k-nearest neighbor, weighted k-nearest neighbor, and neural networks) statistical classification methods for differentiating these species by their kek mating call. We identified 480 kek notes of each species and quantitatively characterized them with five standardized acoustic parameters. Overall, nonparametric classification methods outperformed parametric classification methods for species differentiation (nonparametric tools were between 67–81% accurate, parametric tools were between 56–60% accurate). Of the nine classification methods, Random Forest was the most accurate and precise, resulting in 81.1% correct classification of kek notes to species. This suggests that the mating calls of these sister species are likely difficult for human observers to tell apart. However, it also implies that appropriate statistical tools may allow reasonable species-level classification accuracy of recorded calls and provide an alternative to species classification where other capture- or genotype-based survey techniques are not possible.

Usage Notes

Location

North Carolina
Virginia