Time-lapse videos and snapshot images of mycobacterial cells alone or during infection under drug treatment
Data files
Apr 08, 2024 version files 101.11 GB
-
Dataset2.zip
3.70 GB
-
Dataset3.zip
8.56 GB
-
Dataset4.zip
2.01 GB
-
Dynamic_microfluidic_screening_videos_01.zip
48.36 GB
-
Dynamic_microfluidic_screening_videos_02.zip
38.49 GB
-
README.md
5.09 KB
Abstract
Original approaches are needed to cope with drug-recalcitrant infections that threaten global health, including tuberculosis. Here, we implemented a drug-discovery strategy based on a customized microfluidic dynamic single-cell screening for pheno-tuning compounds (µDeSCRiPTor). Our strategy assesses dynamic phenotypic changes occurring at the level of single mycobacterial cells upon exposure to pheno-tuning compounds, via time-lapse microscopy. The goal was to identify compounds that synergize with existing anti-tubercular drugs, ultimately making the bacterial population more homogeneously susceptible to therapy. Among the four identified hits, we focused on M06, which shows promise for improving tuberculosis therapy.
README: Time-lapse videos and snapshot images of mycobacterial cells alone or during infection under drug treatment
This dataset includes four distinct datasets as described below.
Dataset 1: Dynamic microfluidic screening videos
The two directories contain 15 folders, one for each experiment defined by a unique alphanumeric code. Each folder contains 3 associated .tif files per each experimental point: one image stack for the green channel (GFP); one image stack for the red channel (mCherry); and one image stack for the binary mask (Mask). Each file is named as follows: Experiment ID_Point_nnn_Condition_File type. Only those points that were used for analysis are included in the directory. Dataset 1 is associated with Figure 1 of the paper.
Experiment N, Experiment ID, Image acquisition frequency (min), Exposure start-frame, Exposure end-frame
1 S1R1 30 14 24
2 S1R2 30 13 24
3 S2R1 30 10 21
4 S2R2 20 10 27
5 S3R1 30 14 24
6 S3R2 30 13 23
7 S4R1 20 6 22
8 S4R2 30 13 24
9 SCR1 30 13 24
10 SCR4 30 10 21
11 SCR5 30 10 21
12 SCR6 30 10 21
13 SCR7 30 9 20
14 SCR9 30 13 25
15 SCR10 30 11 23
Dataset 2: Snapshot images of M. tuberculosis expressing different NAT variants under stress
The directory contains individual .tif files with two channels (C): either CellROX or FM464 fluorescence (C1) and phase contrast (C2). The ID name of each file contains the experimental information necessary to identify the content type: Dye_Strain_Condition_Point_Replica. Dataset 2 is associated with Figure 4 of the paper.
Dye: CellROX or FM464 fluorescent dyes.
Strain: M. tuberculosis WT; MUT (NAT L81del mutant); OE (NAT overexpressing); SI (NAT silenced); CTsg (strain containing control plasmid for SI).
Condition: CT (DMSO); H2O2 (30 mM); M06 12.5 µg/mL (10X MIC); MOX 0.5 µg/mL (10X MIC); INH 0.25 µg/mL (10X MIC); RIF 0.8 µg/mL (10X MIC).
Point: analyzed point (Pn).
Replica: Two biologically independent cultures were processed separately, and pooled in equal amounts just before snapshot image acquisition.
Dataset 3: Time-lapse videos of M. tuberculosis RecA reporter stressed with INH and M06
The directory contains individual .tif movie files, which were drift-corrected and manually analyzed on ImageJ. Each image stack is composed of three channels (C): GFPcyt (C1); phase contrast (C2); RecA-mCherry (C3). The ID name of each file contains the experimental information necessary to identify the content type: Strain_Drug_Point_Replica. Dataset 3 is associated with Figure 5 of the paper.
Strain: M. tuberculosis (Mtub) dual fluorescent reporter RecA-mCherry_GFPcyt (GMT37).
Drug: either isoniazid alone (INH), or M06 alone followed by M06 in combination with INH (M06_INH). Bacilli were imaged every 3 hours under the following conditions.
For INH movies:
Start frame, End frame, Condition
1 17 Pre-growth in 7H9 medium only
18 37 INH 0.2 µg/mL (8X MIC)
38 89 Washing in 7H9 medium only
For M06_INH movies:
Start frame, End frame, Condition
1 19 Pre-growth in 7H9 medium only
20 35 M06 1.25 µg/mL (1X MIC)
36 55 M06 1.25 µg/mL (1X MIC) + INH 0.2 µg/mL (8X MIC)
56 113 Washing in 7H9 medium only
Point: analyzed movie point (Mn).
Replica: Three biologically independent cultures were loaded on different areas of the microfluidic device, imaged over time, and analyzed.
Dataset 4: Snapshot images of THP-1 macrophages infected with M. tuberculosis RecA reporter and treated with M06
The directory contains individual .dv files, which can be opened with open-source software like ImageJ, and the ImageJ macro generated for analysis (Macro_Analysis_THP1_MTUB.ijm). Each .dv file derives from maximum-intensity projection (PRJ) of eight z-stacks 2-µm spaced. PRJ .dv files are composed of three channels (C): bright field (C0); GFPcyt (C1); RecA-mCherry (C2). The ID name of each file contains the experimental information necessary to identify the content type: Replica_Condition_Day_Cell_Strain_Point_Processing. Dataset 4 is associated with Figure 5 of the paper.
Replica: four biological replicates were analyzed.
Condition: either untreated control (CT) or treated with M06 1.25 µg/mL (1X MIC).
Day: days post infection, i.e., D0 and D2.
Cell: infected cell type THP-1 macrophages.
Strain: M. tuberculosis (Mtub) dual fluorescent reporter RecA-mCherry_GFPcyt (GMT37).
Point: analyzed point (Pn).
Processing: projected stacks (PRJ).
Sharing/access Information
The dataset is associated with a preprint, which has just been accepted for publication: Mistretta M, Cimino M, Campagne P, Volant S, Kornobis E, Hebert O, Rochais C, Dallemagne P, Lecoutey C, Tisnerat C, Lepailleur A, Ayotte Y, LaPlante SR, Gangneux N, Záhorszká M, Korduláková J, Vichier-Guerre S, Bonhomme F, Pokorny L, Albert M, Tinevez J-Y, Manina G. Dynamic microfluidic single-cell screening identifies pheno-tuning compounds to potentiate tuberculosis therapy. bioRxiv 2023.03.31.535085.
Methods
Dynamic microfluidic screening videos (Dataset 1). A Mycobacterium smegmatis fluorescent reporter of DNA damage response (RecA-GFP), also constitutively expressing a red-fluorescent marker (mCherrycyt) was analyzed by multi-phasic time-resolved microscopy using a customized multi-condition microfluidic platform. Cells were dispensed into the 32 microfluidic growth chambers and imaged at regular time intervals using a motorized inverted epifluorescence microscope, equipped with a 100X oil objective. Fluorescence imaging conditions were: GFP/FITC [Excitation (Ex) at 475/28 nm, Emission (Em) at 525/48 nm] 50% transmittance (T), 150 msec; mCherry (Ex 575/25, Em 625/45), 50% T, 150 msec. Coordinates of the location of individual bacteria or small groups of bacteria, referred to as points, were recorded and monitored throughout the three phases of the experiment: exponential growth in fresh medium; exposure to subinhibitory concentrations of 72 test compounds or control conditions; and washing of cells in fresh medium. Raw image stacks were extracted for each channel and smoothed. Binary masks of whole microcolonies were created from red-channel images, using K-means clustering to identify the regions of interest (ROI) containing only cells. All objects smaller than a single cell, separated from the main ROI, or placed on the edge of the image were omitted from the final mask. A shape complexity index was also calculated for each ROI, and images with an index lower than 14 were excluded. This process was reiterated for each stack of images (movie). Finally, binary masks were visually examined and only 54% of them were retained for further ROI analysis and statistics.
Snapshot images of M. tuberculosis expressing different NAT variants under stress (Dataset 2). Secondary cultures of M. tuberculosis H37Rv control (WT), NAT (rv3566c) mutant (MUT, Leu81del), NAT-overexpressing (OE) were cultured in Middlebrook 7H9 broth until OD600 0.5, in duplicate. Secondary cultures of M. tuberculosis NAT-silencing (SI) and related control strain (CTsg) were diluted to OD600 0.05 and induced with anhydrotetracycline (100 ng/mL) for 3 days prior to stress exposure, in duplicate. Mid-log phase secondary cultures were treated for 24 h with DMSO (CT), H2O2 (30 mM), or with different drugs at 10X-MIC concentration: M06 (12.5 µg/mL); moxifloxacin (MOX, 500 ng/mL); isoniazid (INH, 250 ng/mL); rifampicin (RIF, 800 ng/mL). Next, bacilli were stained with either CellROX (5 µM) or FM464 (5 µg/mL) dyes for 30 min. Bacteria were imaged by phase-contrast and fluorescence using an inverted DeltaVision Elite Microscope (Leica) equipped with a UPLFLN100XO2/PH3/1.30 objective (Olympus). All samples were prepared by dispensing 0.6 μL of bacterial suspension between two #1.5 coverslips, sealed with glue. Exposure conditions: phase-contrast 50% T (channel 2), 100 msec; Cy5 (Ex 632/22, Em 679/34 – channel 1) 50% T, 100 msec for CellROX detection; TRITC (Ex 542/27, Em 597/45 – channel 1) 50% T, 100 msec for FM464 detection. Individual bacilli were automatically segmented in phase contrast, using Omnipose for cell segmentation in combination with a custom-trained model. The latter was obtained from training on a dataset consisting of the ground truth dataset provided as part of Omnipose and additional manually labeled images of M. tuberculosis. A Python notebook was written to extract single-cell fluorescence and cell area from snapshot images using the Omnipose-derived segmentation masks. Inverted masks were used to extract background fluorescence, which was subtracted from the fluorescence of each cell.
Time-lapse videos of M. tuberculosis RecA reporter stressed with INH and M06 (Dataset 3). Log-phase M. tuberculosis reporter of DNA damage response (RecA-mCherry), also constitutively expressing a green-fluorescent marker (GFPcyt) reporter (OD600nm 0.5) was diluted ten times in fresh 7H9 medium in the absence of detergents and seeded into our microfluidic hexa-device. The microfluidic assembly was mounted on a DeltaVision Microscope at 37 °C. Growth medium in the absence or presence of M06 (1.25 µg/mL, 1X MIC) and/or INH (MIC: 0.2 µ/mL, 8X MIC) was injected at 10-µl/min rate from a syringe pump, according to the different experimental phases. Images were acquired every 3 hours using a UPLFLN100XO2/PH3/1.30 objective (Olympus) and a high-speed sCMOS camera, 2,560 x 2,160 pixels, pixel size 6.5 x 6.5 μm, 15-bit, spectral range of 370–1,100 nm. Exposure conditions were phase-contrast 100 % T (channel 2), 200 msec, FITC (Ex 492/28, Em 523/23 – channel 1) 50% T, 50 msec; TRITC (Ex 556/25, Em 611/47 – channel 3) 100% T, 250 msec. Individual cells were manually segmented at specific time points using ROI Manager Macro of ImageJ 2.0.0.-rc-59/1.51n or counted over time using the Cell Counter plugin. Total fluorescence was normalized to cell area and background fluorescence was also subtracted.
Snapshot images of THP-1 macrophages infected with M. tuberculosis RecA reporter and treated with M06 (Dataset 4). THP-1 monocytes (ATCC TIB-202) were cultured in RPMI 1640 (Gibco) supplemented with 10% FBS and 1X PS. Each stock of about 106 cells per mL in RPMI and 10% DMSO was defrosted at 37 °C, washed once in 10 mL, and inoculated in 30 mL of prewarmed complete RPMI using a T-175 flask. Cells were propagated at 37 °C in a humidified 5% CO2 atmosphere until confluence, for up to four days. For final experiments, confluent cells were diluted to a concentration of 105 cells/mL in complete RPMI without phenol red and without antibiotics and seeded into a 35-mm µ-Dish (ibidi) in the presence of PMA (30 ng/mL). After 36-hour incubation, cells were washed with fresh medium and re-incubated overnight before infection. Differentiated THP1 macrophages were infected with M. tuberculosis RecA-mCherry_GFPcyt reporter diluted in RPMI without phenol red to OD600 0.005 (MOI 1:5). After 3 hours of incubation at 37 °C in humidified 5% CO2 atmosphere, cells were washed five times with complete RPMI without phenol red. Infected cells were either left untreated (CT) or were treated with M06 (M06, 1.25 µg/mL, 1X MIC). Imaging was carried out at time zero (D0) and after 2 days (D2) of infection. Eight images were acquired for each field of view through a z-stack of 16 µm, starting the scan from the middle of the sample, using a 100X oil immersion objective, 1.4NA, WD 0.12mm (Olympus). Exposure conditions on the Delta Vision microscope: bright field 10% T, 50 msec (channel 0); FITC (Ex 475/28, Em 525/48 – channel 1) 50% T, 25 msec; TRITC (Ex 542/27, Em 597/45 – channel 2) 100% T, 100 msec. Image stacks were projected by maximum intensity in SoftWorx, and processed on ImageJ, by segmenting intracellular bacterial foci based on their green fluorescence. Derived masks were used to measure the size and both fluorescence channels to assess RecA induction and control the fluorescence of intracellular bacilli. Inverted masks were used to subtract background fluorescence from each ROI. The customized ImageJ macro used for analysis is also provided (Macro_Analysis_THP1_MTUB.ijm).
Usage notes
Open-source image analysis software, such as ImageJ, can be used to open both .tif and .dv files.