Skip to main content
Dryad

Data from: Seasonal progression and differences in major floral resource use by bees and hoverflies in a diverse horticultural and agricultural landscape revealed by DNA metabarcoding

Cite this dataset

Lowe, Abigail et al. (2022). Data from: Seasonal progression and differences in major floral resource use by bees and hoverflies in a diverse horticultural and agricultural landscape revealed by DNA metabarcoding [Dataset]. Dryad. https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.rjdfn2z9s

Abstract

Gardens are important habitats for pollinators, providing floral resources and nesting sites. There are high levels of public support for growing ‘pollinator-friendly’ plants but whilst plant recommendation lists are available, they are usually inconsistent, poorly supported by scientific research and target a narrow group of pollinators. In order to supply the most appropriate resources, there is a clear need to understand foraging preferences, for a range of pollinators, across the season within horticultural landscapes.

Using an innovative DNA metabarcoding approach, we investigated foraging preferences of four groups of pollinators in a large and diverse, horticultural, and agricultural landscape, across the flowering season and over two years, significantly improving on the spatial and temporal scale that can be achieved using observational studies.

Bumblebees, honeybees, non-corbiculate bees, and hoverflies visited 191 plant taxa. Overall floral resources were shared between the different types of pollinators, but significant differences were seen between the plants used most abundantly by bees (Hymenoptera) and hoverflies (Diptera).

Floral resource use by pollinators is strongly associated with seasonal changes in flowering plants, with pollinators relying on dominant plants found within each season, with preferences consistent across both years.

The plants identified were categorised according to their native status to investigate the value of native and non-native plants. The majority of floral resources used were of native and near-native origin, but the proportion of horticultural and naturalised plants increased during late summer and autumn.

Synthesis and applications: We recommend that plant lists should distinguish between bees and hoverflies and provide evidence-based floral recommendations throughout the year that include native as well as non-native plants for use in the UK and Northern Europe. Specific management recommendations include reducing mowing to encourage plants such as dandelion Taraxacum officinale, buttercups Ranunculus spp., and reducing scrub management to encourage bramble Rubus fruticosus.

Usage notes

Supporting Data:

Tab Data
Pollen_sample_metadata Metadata relating to the insects sampled
rbcL_consensus_ID_read_counts 2018 and 2019 pollen rbcL metabarcoding data as read counts
ITS2_consensus_ID_read_counts 2018 and 2019 pollen ITS2 metabarcoding data as read counts
rbcL_and_ITS2_consensus_read_counts 2018 and 2019 pollen metabarcoding data - rbcL and ITS2 read counts summed
rbcL_and_ITS2_consensus_rra 2018 and 2019 pollen metabarcoding data - rbcL and ITS2 combined relative read abundance
consensus_identifications Consensus identifications used to match taxa between each marker
floral_surveys Most abundant plants across both years per transect area per season