1. Age-related variation in reproductive performance in long-lived iteroparous vertebrate species is common, with performance being influenced by within-individual processes, such as improvement and senescence, in combination with among-individual processes, such as selective appearance and disappearance. Few studies of age-related reproductive performance have compared the role of these drivers within a metapopulation, subject to varying degrees of resource competition.

2. We accounted for within- and among-individuals changes among known-aged Adélie penguins (Pygoscelis adeliae) during 17 years (1997 to 2013), at three clustered colonies of disparate size, to understand patterns in age-related reproductive success during early and late adulthood.

3. Age at first reproduction (AFR) was lowest, and number of breeding attempts highest, at the largest colony. Regardless of AFR, success improved with early post-recruitment experience. For both oldest and youngest recruitment groups, peak performance occurred at the end of their reproductive lifespan indicating a possible cost of reproduction. Intermediate recruitment groups reached peak performance in their mid-reproductive lifespan and with intermediate breeding experience, before decreasing. Breeding success was lowest for the initial breeding attempt regardless of AFR, but we observed subsequent variation relative to recruitment age. Gaining experience by delaying recruitment positively influenced reproductive performance early in the reproductive lifespan, and was most evident for the youngest breeders. Oldest recruits had the highest initial and peak breeding success. Differences in AFR resulted in tradeoffs in reproductive lifespan or timing of senescence but not in the overall number of breeding attempts.

4. Patterns differed as a function of colony size, and thus competition for resources. Early life improvement in performance at the larger colonies was primarily due to within-individual factors and at the largest colony, AFR. Regardless of colony size late-life performance was positively related to the age at last reproduction, indicating selective disappearance of lower performing individuals.

5. These results highlight that different life-history strategies were equally successful, indicating that individuals can overcome potential tradeoffs associated with early- and late-life performance. These results have important implications for understanding the evolution of life-history strategies responsible for driving population change.

Data from: "Age-related reproductive performance of the Adélie penguin, a long-lived seabird exhibiting similar outcomes regardless of individual life-history strategy" PJ Kappes, KM Dugger, A Lescroël, DG Ainley, G Ballard, KJ Barton, PO’B Lyver, & PR Wilson (2021) Journal of Animal Ecology

Data are uploaded separately for different analyses. IDs have been recoded. 

"BreedingSuccess"
Data for the population-level analysis, used to model age-related variation in breeding success for different catagories of age at first reproduction and to account for selective dissappearance in late life reproduction (Table 2; Table 3; Figure 2; Figure 3; Table S1 (Full data set); Table S2; Table S3; Table S4; Table S5; Figure S1; Figure S2) 

ID             Individual identity (recoded)
colony      Breeding colony (i.e. Bird, Crozier, & Royds)
season      Year of breeding season always starting with year that birds arrived to breed (e.g. arrive October 1999 = 1999)
success     1 = chick successfully fledged; 0 = nest failed    
breeder     1 = observed engaging in breeding behavior (i.e., incubating, brooding, feeding chick); 0 = not observed in breeding behaviors
age           True age (in years)
afr            Age at first reproduction (in years)
afrc          Age at first reproduction (recoded as 4 level factor); 3 = 3 years; 4 = 4 years; 5 = 5-8 years; 6 = 9+ years
expt         True breeding experience: first breeding attempt = 0 and +1 for each subsequent breeding attempt (sabbatical years = 0)
expl         Learned breeding experience: first breeding attempt = 0 and +1 for each year bird is alive after first breeding attempt 
alr            Age at last reproduction (in years)

"EarlyAdulthoodBirdData"
Data for the analysis of factors underpinning breeding success in early adulthood (controlling for selective appearance)
(Table 4a; Table S1 (Early adulthood)

ID            Individual identity (recoded)
season     Year of breeding season always starting with year that birds arrived to breed (e.g. arrive October 1999 = 1999)
success    1 = chick successfully fledged; 0 = nest failed    
ysfba       Years since first breeding attempt
afr           Age at first reproduction (in years)
ba1          1 = first breeding attempt; 0 = subsequent breeding attempts

"EarlyAdulthoodCrozierData"
Data for the analysis of factors underpinning breeding success in early adulthood (controlling for selective appearance)
(Table 4a; Table S1 (Early adulthood)

ID            Individual identity (recoded)
season     Year of breeding season always starting with year that birds arrived to breed (e.g. arrive October 1999 = 1999)
success    1 = chick successfully fledged; 0 = nest failed    
ysfba       Years since first breeding attempt
afr            Age at first reproduction (in years)
ba1          1 = first breeding attempt; 0 = subsequent breeding attempts

"EarlyAdulthoodRoydsData"
Data for the analysis of factors underpinning breeding success in early adulthood (controlling for selective appearance)
(Table 4a; Table S1 (Early adulthood)

ID            Individual identity (recoded)
season     Year of breeding season always starting with year that birds arrived to breed (e.g. arrive October 1999 = 1999)
success    1 = chick successfully fledged; 0 = nest failed    
ysfba       Years since first breeding attempt
afr           Age at first reproduction (in years)
ba1         1 = first breeding attempt; 0 = subsequent breeding attempts

"LateAdulthoodBirdData"
Data for the analysis of factors underpinning breeding success in late adulthood (controlling for selective disappearance)
(Table 4b; Table S1 (Late adulthood)

ID           Individual identity (recoded)
season     Year of breeding season always starting with year that birds arrived to breed (e.g. arrive October 1999 = 1999)
success    1 = chick successfully fledged; 0 = nest failed    
alr           Age at last reproduction (in years)
ybd         Years before death (in years)
lba          1 = last breeding attempt; 0 = previous breeding attempts

"LateAdulthoodCrozierData"
Data for the analysis of factors underpinning breeding success in late adulthood (controlling for selective disappearance)
(Table 4b; Table S1 (Late adulthood)

ID             Individual identity (recoded)
season      Year of breeding season always starting with year that birds arrived to breed (e.g. arrive October 1999 = 1999)
success     1 = chick successfully fledged; 0 = nest failed    
alr            Age at last reproduction (in years)
ybd          Years before death (in years)
lba           1 = last breeding attempt; 0 = previous breeding attempts

"LateAdulthoodRoydsData"
Data for the analysis of factors underpinning breeding success in late adulthood (controlling for selective disappearance)
(Table 4b; Table S1 (Late adulthood)

ID             Individual identity (recoded)
season      Year of breeding season always starting with year that birds arrived to breed (e.g. arrive October 1999 = 1999)
success     1 = chick successfully fledged; 0 = nest failed    
alr            Age at last reproduction (in years)
ybd          Years before death (in years)
lba           1 = last breeding attempt; 0 = previous breeding attempts

The attached archived file(s) contain data derived from a long term field project monitoring individual Adelie penguins at capes Bird, Crozier, and Royds, Ross Island, Antarctica and Beaufort Island, Antarctica.

This is a request to please let us know if you use them.  Several of the co-authors have spent the best part of their careers collecting the data.

If you plan to analyse the data, there are a number of reasons why it would be very helpful if you could contact Grant Ballard (gballard@pointblue.org) before doing so:

1) Occasionally we discover and correct errors in the data.

2) The data are complex and workers who do not know the study system are likely to benefit from advice on interpretation.

3) At any one time, quite a few people within the existing project collaboration are analysing data from this project. Someone else may already be conducting the analysis you have in mind and it is desirable to prevent duplication of effort.

4) In order to maintain funding for the project and for further analyses, every few years we submit proposals to funding agencies. It is therefore very helpful for those running the project to know which data analyses are in progress elsewhere.

If you are interested in analysing the detailed project data in any depth, you may find it helpful to have access to the full relational database rather than the files available here. If so, we are always open to further collaboration.

The individual bird identities have been recoded and should therefore not be linked with data archived from other papers which include penguin data from these breeding colonies or that are associated with the Penguin Science (https://penguinscience.com/) research project.