Skip to main content
Dryad logo

Data from: Lower elevation animal species do not tend to be better competitors than their upper elevation relatives

Citation

Freeman, Benjamin (2020), Data from: Lower elevation animal species do not tend to be better competitors than their upper elevation relatives, Dryad, Dataset, https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.tk63005

Abstract

Abstract Aim: What factors set species’ range edges? One general hypothesis, often attributed to Darwin and MacArthur, is that interspecific competition prevents species from inhabiting the warmest portions along geographic gradients (i.e., low latitudes or low elevations). A prediction arising from this Darwin-MacArthur hypothesis is that lower elevation species are better competitors than related upper elevation species. An alternative prediction is that upper elevation taxa will tend to be better competitors because they will tend to be larger (Bergmann’s rule). Here, I test these opposing predictions. Location: Global. Time period: 1971 – 2019. Major taxa studied: Birds, mammals, amphibians, fishes. Methods: I conducted a meta-analysis of studies that have measured pairwise behavioral aggression between species-pairs of closely related animals where the two species inhabit divergent elevational distributions. Results: I found that (1) interspecific aggression appears to be a reliable indicator of interspecific competition; (2) elevational position was not consistently linked to interspecific aggression—while lower elevation songbird species in the tropics showed stronger interspecific aggression in response to playback experiments, upper elevation species showed stronger interspecific aggression in direct observations of interspecific aggression across a range of taxa and latitudes; (3) body size was a good predictor of pairwise interspecific aggression and (4) there was limited evidence for Bergmann’s rule. Main conclusions: My results do not support the longstanding prediction that lower elevation animals are generally better competitors than their upper elevation relatives. Instead, patterns of interspecific aggression are linked to body size, with larger animals showing more aggression towards smaller relatives than vice versa. Hence, a trait—body size—that is idiosyncratically related to elevational position appear to determine the outcome of pairwise behavioral interactions. Last, I consider these results in the context of the hypothesis that behavioral interactions may impact rates of upslope range shifts associated with recent warming.

Usage Notes

Location

global