3D coordinates of the foraging flights of wild black skimmers
Data files
Jul 30, 2024 version files 44.36 MB
-
North_Pond_xyzpts.csv
10.77 MB
-
README.md
3.40 KB
-
Shell_Island_I_xyzpts.csv
9.46 MB
-
Shell_Island_II_xyzpts.csv
11.79 MB
-
Shell_Island_III_xyzpts.csv
5.93 MB
-
Shell_Island_IV_xyzpts.csv
6.40 MB
Abstract
Birds commonly exploit environmental features such as columns of rising air and vertical windspeed gradients to lower the cost of flight. These environmental subsidies may be especially important for birds that forage via continuous flight, as seen in black skimmers. These birds forage through a unique behavior, called skimming, where they fly above the water surface with their mandible lowered into the water, catching fish on contact. Thus, their foraging flight incurs the costs of moving through both air and water. Prior studies of black skimmer flight behavior have focused on reductions in flight cost due to ground effect but ignored potential beneficial interactions with the surrounding air. We hypothesized a halfpipe skimming strategy for skimmers to reduce the foraging cost by taking advantage of the wind gradient, where the skimmers perform a wind gradient energy extraction maneuver at the end of a skimming bout through a foraging patch. Using video recordings, wind speed, and wind direction measurements we recorded 70 bird tracks over four days at two field sites on the North Carolina coast. We found that while ascending the skimmers flew more upwind and then flew more downwind when descending, a pattern consistent with harvesting energy from the wind gradient. The strength of the wind gradient and the flight behavior of the skimmers indicate that the halfpipe skimming strategy could reduce foraging costs by up to 2.5%.
This dataset contains the XYZ coordinates of black skimmers foraging flight tracks taken in 5 different recording sessions. The flights were recorded using three video cameras, videos were synchronized the scene was calibrated and aligned using the DLTdv (Hedrick, 2008) application on MatLab. The tracks were smoothed using a 4-pole digital Butterworth low pass filter with a cutoff frequency of 0.5 Hz. We found that while ascending the skimmers flew more upwind and then flew more downwind when descending, a pattern consistent with harvesting energy from the wind gradient.
Description of the data and file structure
For each CSV file the columns represent the XYZ coordinates for each tracked point, so that the first three columns will contain XYZ (in that order) coordinates for point one, columns 4-6 will be the second point, and so forth. For all files ‘NaN’ is a missing data point on a track. Missing data results from one or more cameras not capturing the moving or static object being tracked.
Here is what you will find for each file and some extra information:
North Pond
Recording date: September 15, 2020
The columns in this file represent the XYZ coordinates for each tracked point:
- Birds: Columns 1-42, 61-63
- Water alignment points: Columns 55-57
- Coastline points: Columns 85-87
- No skimming flights: Columns 43-54, 58-60, 64-84
Wind speed at 2 m: 4 - 6 m/s
Wind direction NE
Shell Island I
Recording date: October 21, 2021
The columns in this file represent the XYZ coordinates for each tracked point:
- Calibration points: Columns 1-3
- Water alignment points: Columns 4-6
- Wind vane: Columns 7-9
- Coastline points: Columns 10-12
- Birds: Columns 13-54
- Wind vane v2 end of file (not used): Columns 55-57
Wind speed by height:
- Ground (0.035 m): 3.3-4.4 m/s
- 1 m: 6.0-7.1 m/s
- 2 m: 5.8-6.2 m/s
- 2.5 m: 5.4-5.7 m/s
Shell Island II
Recording date: October 21, 2021
The columns in this file represent the XYZ coordinates for each tracked point:
- Calibration points: Columns 1-3
- Tracking stability of camera 1: Columns 4-6
- Wind vane: Columns 7-9
- Water alignment points: Columns 10-12
- Coastline points: Columns 13-15
- Birds: Columns 16-81
Wind speed by height:
- Ground (0.035 m): 1.2-1.5 m/s
- 1 m: 2.4-2.8 m/s
- 2 m: 2.8-3.01 m/s
- 2.5 m: 2.5-2.8 m/s
Shell Island III
Recording date: October 26, 2021
The columns in this file represent the XYZ coordinates for each tracked point:
- Calibration points: Columns 1-3
- Water alignment points: Columns 10-12
- Wind vane: Columns 13-15
- Birds: Columns 4-9, 16-42
Wind speed by height:
- Ground (0.035 m): 2.2-2.6 m/s
- 1 m: 3.4-3.6 m/s
- 2 m: 5.5-5.7 m/s
- 2.5 m: 4.6-4.8 m/s
Shell Island IV
Recording date: April 8, 2022
The columns in this file represent the XYZ coordinates for each tracked point:
- Calibration points: Columns 1-3
- Water alignment points: Columns 4-6
- Wind vane: Columns 7-9
- Birds: Columns 10-33
- Coastline points: Columns 34-36
Wind speed by height:
- Ground (0.035 m): 5.11, 5.6, 5.56, 4.76, 4.66, 8.59 m/s
- 0.5 m: 7.40, 8.46, 9.30, 8.06, 7.40 m/s
- 1 m: 7.86, 6.92, 6.29, 7.11, 6.63 m/s
- 1.5 m: 9.33, 8.39, 8.48, 7.10, 6.36 m/s
- 2 m: 5.55, 6.34, 6.60, 5.77, 8.15 m/s
- 2.7 m: 4.99, 6.02, 5.67, 6.88, 8.41, 7.1 m/s
The dataset was collected using videos from three digital Canon EOS 6D digital SLR cameras equipped with 50-millimeter lenses. Videos were recorded at 29.97 frames per second. They were synchronized by visual events identified separately in each camera. They were then calibrated for 3D position reconstruction following the protocol from Corcoran and Hedrick (2019) via bundle adjustment using previously determined pinhole model lens parameters and shared 2D information visible in at least two of the three cameras. The scene scale was established from the distances between the three cameras, and calibration parameters were converted to direct linear translation (DLT). The calibration was aligned to place the water surface at Z=0 with positive Z pointing upward and the X and Y directions forming the horizontal plane, with the X axis aligned to wind direction such that bird movements in the increasing horizontal X axis were downwind (in the direction of the wind) and decreasing was upwind (against the wind). Bird track coordinates were acquired with DLTdv (Hedrick, 2008), and bundle adjustment calibrations were performed using the MATLAB computer vision toolbox. Each bird track was then smoothed using a 4-pole digital Butterworth low pass filter with a cutoff frequency of 0.5 Hz.