Skip to main content
Dryad logo

Estimating heritability in honeybees: comparison of three major methods based on empirical and simulated datasets

Citation

Jourdan-Pineau, Hélène et al. (2021), Estimating heritability in honeybees: comparison of three major methods based on empirical and simulated datasets, Dryad, Dataset, https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.tx95x69vd

Abstract

The genetic contribution to phenotypic variation (namely the heritability) affects the response to selection. In honeybee, the haplodiploid sex determination does not allow the straightforward use of classical quantitative genetics methods to estimate heritability and genetic correlation. Nevertheless, specific methods have been developed for about 40 years. In particular, sibling analyses are frequently used with three main methods: an historical model using the average colony relatedness, a half-sibs/full-sibs model and the more recent animal model. We compared those three methods using experimental and simulated datasets to see which performs the best. Our experimental dataset is composed of 10 colonies with a total sample of 853 workers. All individuals were genotyped to reconstitute the pedigree, and phenotypic traits were measured: labial palpus and wing cubital veins lengths. We also simulated phenotypic datasets with varying levels of heritability, common environmental effect and genetic correlation between traits. The simulation approach showed that the average colony relatedness was highly biased in presence of common environmental effect whereas the half-sibs/full-sibs and the animal model gave reliable estimates of heritability. The animal model provided the greatest precision in genetic correlations. Using this latter method, we found that wing vein lengths had high heritabilities, allowing the use of those morphometric characters to discriminate between populations. On the contrary, the palpus length had lower heritability due to larger environmental variance and measurement error. Finally, significant genetic correlations among measured traits indicate that they do not evolve independently.

Methods

Honeybee workers were sampled in Mauritius and La Reunion. We sampled 95 worker honey bees per colony, from the frames of the hives, in a total of ten colonies. Patrilines were determined by genotyping eight microsatellite markers on DNA extracted from the femur. For each worker, morphological measurements of  the mouthparts and the right forewing were made : palpus length, cubital veins of the wing.

Usage Notes

ile island from which the individual is sampled
colonie colony from which the individual is sampled
year year when the individual was sampled
animal identity of the individual
dam mother
sire father
sex sex
A24-1 allele 1 microsatellite marker 1
A24-2 allele 2 microsatellite marker 1
AC306-1 allele 1 microsatellite marker 2
AC306-2 allele 2 microsatellite marker 2
AP66-1 allele 1 microsatellite marker 3
AP66-2 allele 2 microsatellite marker 3
A8-1 allele 1 microsatellite marker 4
A8-2 allele 2 microsatellite marker 4
A29-1 allele 1 microsatellite marker 5
A29-2 allele 2 microsatellite marker 5
AP289-1 allele 1 microsatellite marker 6
AP289-2 allele 2 microsatellite marker 6
AP55-1 allele 1 microsatellite marker 7
AP55-2 allele 2 microsatellite marker 7
AP33-1 allele 1 microsatellite marker 8
AP33-2 allele 2 microsatellite marker 8
A length of the cubital vein A from the wing
B length of the cubital vein B from the wing
IC A/B
palpes length of the palpus (mouthpart)

Funding

European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development

Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement

Conseil Régional de La Réunion