Data from: Structural and functional features of medium spiny neurons in the BACHDΔN17 mouse model of Huntington’s disease
Data files
Jul 18, 2024 version files 9.58 GB
-
Behavior_Data.zip
4.74 GB
-
Electrophysiology_Data.zip
4.84 GB
-
Morphology_Data.zip
142.94 KB
-
README.md
6.38 KB
Oct 07, 2024 version files 9.58 GB
-
Behavior_Data.zip
4.74 GB
-
Electrophysiology_Data.zip
4.84 GB
-
Morphology_Data_10-3-2024_upload.zip
108.86 KB
-
README.md
6.40 KB
Feb 27, 2025 version files 9.58 GB
-
Behavior_Data.zip
4.74 GB
-
Electrophysiology_Data.zip
4.84 GB
-
Morphology_Data.zip
142.64 KB
-
README.md
6.76 KB
Feb 27, 2025 version files 9.58 GB
-
Behavior_Data_04112025.zip
4.74 GB
-
Electrophysiology_Data_04112025.zip
4.84 GB
-
Morphology_Data_04112025.zip
109.72 KB
-
README.md
7 KB
Abstract
In the BACHD mouse model of Huntington’s disease (HD), deletion of the N17 domain of the Huntingtin gene (BACHDΔN17, Q97) has been reported to lead to nuclear accumulation of mHTT and exacerbation of motor deficits, neuroinflammation and striatal atrophy (Gu et al., 2015). Here we characterized the effect of N17 deletion on dorsolateral striatal medium spiny neurons (MSNs) in BACHDΔN17 (Q97) and BACWTΔN17 (Q31) mice by comparing them to MSNs in wildtype (WT) mice. Mice were characterized on a series of motor tasks and subsequently whole cell patch clamp recordings with simultaneous biocytin filling of MSNs in in vitro striatal slices from these mice were used to comprehensively assess their physiological and morphological features. Key findings include that: Q97 mice exhibit impaired gait and righting reflexes but normal tail suspension reflexes and normal coats while Q31 mice do not differ from WT; intrinsic membrane and action potential properties are altered -but differentially so- in MSNs from Q97 and from Q31 mice; excitatory and inhibitory synaptic currents exhibit higher amplitudes in Q31 but not Q97 MSNs, while excitatory synaptic currents occur at lower frequency in Q97 than in WT and Q31 MSNs; there is a reduced total dendritic length in Q31 -but not Q97- MSNs compared to WT, while spine density and number did not differ in MSNs in the three groups. The findings that Q31 MSNs differed from Q97 and WT neurons with regard to some physiological features and structurally suggest a novel role of the N17 domain in the function of WT Htt. The motor phenotype seen in Q97 mice was less robust than that reported in an earlier study (Gu et al., 2015), and the alterations to MSN physiological properties were largely consistent with changes reported previously in a number of other mouse models of HD. Together this study indicates that N17 plays a role in the modulation of the properties of MSNs in both mHtt and WT-Htt mice, but does not markedly exacerbate HD-like pathogenesis in the BACHD model.
Description of the data and file structure
Our raw data for motor behavior (video files: each_individual_subject.MOV); rubric for scoring of the motor behavior (behavior rubric for scoring.xlsx); DN17 Behavior Data for Figure 1.xlsx Note that in the behavior by phenotype datasheet values for the different groups are color-coded as follows: black- WT; blue- Q31; red- Q97.
Our raw data for electrophysiological assessments including Synaptic Events raw data (.ABF and .IBW files generated by MiniAnalysis from .DAT files for excitatory -EPSC- and inhibitory -IPSC- synaptic currents); raw basic membrane property data (Electrophysiology raw data files; .DAT files generated by PatchMaster for ALL physiological data recorded from each cell for each subject); and related excel files with numeric data (.xlsx)
Our raw data analyses spreadsheets for morphological variables quantified from reconstructed medium spiny neurons from which recordings were obtained (dendrite data.xlsx; spine data.xlsx)
DESCRIPTIONS
Behavior_Data
This folder contains:
raw data for motor behavior (video files: each_individual_subject.MOV)
rubric for scoring of the motor behavior (behavior rubric for scoring.xlsx): behavior on tests of tail suspension, gait and righting on a scale from 0 (normal behavior) to 4 (rigid paralysis, no forward motion, righting >10s)
DN17 Behavior Data for Figure 1.xlsx: information in database includes 3 sheets DN17 Subjects & Weights; Behavior by Genotype; Behavior by Sex.
Variables quantified and shown in the spreadsheet include: Animal identifier number; Sex; Date (of sacrifice); Body (weight in grams); Brain (weight in grams); Tail (suspension score); Gait (forward motion score); Righting (time); Coat appearance and; Overall Score
“null” represents a missing value in the database that is either not applicable (e.g. asymptote previously achieved) or not available (e.g. subject did not respond to a given test)
Electrophysiology_Data
This folder contains:
Synaptic events raw data (.abf and .ibw for excitatory -EPSC- and inhibitory IPSC- synaptic currents);
raw basic membrane property data (Electrophysiology raw data files; .dat files for each cell from each subject);
Excel files with numeric data for all synaptic current properties (DN17 EPSC Data and DN17 IPSC Data in .xlsx format) and basic membrane properties (DN17 Ephys in xlsx format); each row includes all raw electrophysiological data for a cell from a given subject (sheet 1 shows raw data from all cells included in the study) other sheets show analyses by animal genotype, by firing rates (spike counts), by medium spiny neuron type (D1 versus D2 type); tables and charts shown in the electrophysiology figures are also provided.
Variables included are:
For Synaptic Event Data- Time (total time recorded in ms); and MEAN- Amplitude (of events in pA); Rise (time of events in ms); Decay (time of events in ms); Area (of events in pA/ms); Baseline (value in pA); Noise (value in pA); Group (0 indicates single type f synaptic event); Channel (0 indicates one acquisition channel);10-90Rise (rise time in ms); HalfWidth (event half-with in ms); Rise50 (event rise time in ms); Peak Dir (direction of current -1 is inward, 1 is outward); Burst#BurstE# (bursting behavior, 0 indicates none);10-90Slope (indicates rise time pA/ms); Rel Time (relative time from onset of first event in ms).
For Basic Membrane Electrophysiology Data- Intrinsic Membrane Properties: GFP+/- (indicates whether the cell was D1 or D2 based on presence or absence of GFP); GFP Check (indicates confirmation of GFP status); Drug (no drugs were applied so value is always “null”; Biocytin filled (indicates whether neuron was filled during recording and thus subsequently used for morphometrics);Tau (membrane time constant in ms); Rn (input resistance in MOhm); Vr (resting membrane potential in mV). Action Potential (AP) Properties: Thrshld (AP threshold in mV); Amp (AP amplitude in mV); Dur@1/2 (AP duration at half amplitude in ms); Rise (AP rise time in ms); Fall (AP fall time in ms); Rheobase (AP rheobase in pA).
“null” represents a missing value in the database that is either not applicable (e.g. asymptote previously achieved) or not available (e.g. cell did not respond to a given stimulus)
Morphology_Data
Our raw data for each individual neuron reconstruction are posted as .SWC files at NeuroMorpho.org and noted in the paper: https://neuromorpho.org/bylab.jsp#top (each cell is identified by name, e.g. Q31-D1-Aug28IR3c-whole-cell)
This folder contains:
Excel databases containing raw data for each cell from each subject are given in two databases- Dendrites, and Spines showing all quantitative information for these morphological features as shown in the morphology figures by genotype.
Variables included are:
For Dendritic Data- *for each cell that was reconstructed we provide: *Total dendritic length (in microns); branch order count; branch order average length (in microns); Sholl analysis (concentric 20 micron rings from 0-20 to 260-280 microns)
For Spine Data- *DENSITY spreadsheet- for each cell that was reconstructed we provide: *Spine Density Counts, shown in columns B to H; Spines (count); none Spine (unclassified spine type count, typically 0); thin Spine (count); stubby Spine (count); mushroom Spine (count); filopodia Spine (count); Length Total (of dendrites on which spines were assessed, in microns)- followed by calculated density in columns J to X. Mean values are given in columns Z to AI. SHOLL spreadsheet- for each cell that was reconstructed we provide: number and density of spines as a function of distance from soma in concentric 10 micron rings (varies depending on cell).
“null” represents a missing value in the database that is not applicable (e.g. asymptote previously achieved or end of process achieved in Sholl rings)
Version changes
22 Feb 2025 : These include changing the n of subjects in two databases and addition of one variable in the morphology database. For the behavior database we changed the n to 6 and uploaded a revised database indicating this simple change. We also added total node data for figure 5 has been uploaded to the dryad morphology database.
11 April 2025: These include removal of t test statistical outcomes that were preliminary in the excel databases (note that actual statistical analyses reported in the paper with MatLab analyses are found in the Electrophysiology folder).
Sharing/Access information
Links to other publicly accessible locations of the data:
-
NeuroMorpho.Org
http://neuromorpho.org/, Luebke archive includes the morphological reconstruction of the neurons studied in Goodliffe et al., 2020.