Skip to main content
Dryad logo

Ecosystem functions in natural and anthropogenic ecosystems across the East African coastal forest landscape

Citation

Habel, Jan; Ulrich, Werner (2020), Ecosystem functions in natural and anthropogenic ecosystems across the East African coastal forest landscape, Dryad, Dataset, https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.vt4b8gtnx

Abstract

Habitat identity and landscape configuration significantly shape species communities and affect ecosystem functions. The conservation of natural ecosystems is of particular relevance in regions where landscapes have already been largely transformed into farmland and where habitats suffer under resource exploitation. The spill-over of ecosystem functions from natural ecosystems into farmland may positively influence agricultural productivity and human livelihood quality. We measured three proxies of ecosystem functioning: Pollinator diversity (using pan traps), seed dispersal (a seed removal experiment), and predation (using dummy caterpillars). We assessed these ecosystem functions in three forest types of the East African dry coastal forest (Brachystegia forest, Cynometra forest, mixed forest), as well as in adjoining farmland and in plantations of exotic trees (Eucalyptus mainly). We measured ecosystem functions at 20 plots for each habitat type, and along gradients ranging from the forest into farmland. We also recorded various environmental parameters for each study plot. We did not find significant differences of ecosystem functions when combining all proxies assessed, neither among the three natural forest types, nor between natural forest and plantations. However, we found trends for single ecosystem functions. We identified highest pollinator diversity along the forest margin and in farmlands. Vegetation cover and blossom density affected the level of predation positively. Based on our findings we suggest that flowering gardens around housings and woodlots across farmland areas support ecosystem functioning, and thus improve human livelihood quality. We conclude that levels of overall ecosystem functions are affected by entire landscapes, and high landscape heterogeneity, as found in our case, might blur potential negative effects and trends arising from habitat destruction and degradation.

Methods

We established 20 study plots in each of the habitat types (the three forest types, plantations and agricultural land). Plots were set with a minimum distance of 300m among each other to avoid potential spatial autocorrelations. We established 20 forest-farmland-gradients with 9 plots along each gradient (in total 180 study plots along gradients). These gradients covered natural mixed forest, the forest margin, and adjoining farmland. Gradients were set perpendicularly to the border of the forest. For each gradient we established two study plots inside the forest (256m and 8m distant from forest edge), at the forest border (0m), and six study plots in agricultural land (with 8m, 16m, 32m, 64m, 128m, and 256m distant from forest edge, using a logarithmic scale). We measured proxies of three ecosystem functions: Pollinator abundance, predation and seed dispersal. These ecosystem functions are interpreted to be of high relevance to agro-ecosystem functioning. We measured these proxies following the Rapid Ecosystem Function Assessment approach.