Do maternal allocations towards offspring quality and quantity ameliorate the effects of predators on offspring survival?
Data files
Apr 16, 2024 version files 116.88 KB
Abstract
Reproductive allocation is often balanced between the quantity and quality of offspring. Ecological stresses, like exposure to predators, can cause organisms to shift their allocations along this continuum. While the consequences of such plastic shifts for offspring performance are often untested, they are critical to understanding the potential long-term benefits of manipulating predation risk as an agricultural pest management technique. Predation risk induces reductions in egg production and increases in nutritional condition due to maternal provisioning in Colorado potato beetles (Leptinotarsa decemlineata, CPB). Here we tested whether reductions in density or increases in offspring condition, which may increase per-capita larval survival, can compensate for the reduction in total egg production, especially when offspring are exposed to predators. In two field trials, we manipulated the density and condition of larval CPB and measured survival through development to adulthood in field cages with and without predaceous stink bugs (Podisus maculiventris). As expected, cages with the higher initial larval densities had more larvae and adults surviving in the treatments without predators –about 30-50% survival across densities. When predators were present this relationship did not hold because of density-dependent predation. Larval condition interacted with density and impacted larval survival in both trials albeit in different ways. In Trial 1, unprovisioned beetles had higher survival at the higher densities, in Trial 2 provisioned beetles had higher survival across densities.
Synthesis and Applications: Overall, our test of the effects of predation risk via manipulations of larval density and condition revealed few net compensatory benefits to the prey of reduced density and higher condition. Benefits to the prey of shifts in allocation from the quantity to quality of offspring may depend on factors that influence the strength of density dependence, including predation intensity. Our results suggest a new strategy of taking advantage of the reductions in prey density due to the non-consumptive effects of predators as a pest management approach to protect plants.
README: Do maternal allocations towards offspring quality and quantity ameliorate the effects of predators on offspring survival?
https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.xwdbrv1ms
File 1: Ugine_et_al._2024_1
Column headings and their meaning
- Trial = two replicate tests of the same hypothesis (Trial 1 and Trial 2)
- Cage = identity of the field mesocosm
- Initial larval density = the number of first instar potato beetle larvae placed into the cage (larvae/cage)
- Provisioning = low are unprovisioned beetles, high were provided sibling eggs to consume
- Predator presence = Yes indicates we placed Podisus maculiventris in the cage, and No indicates no predators added to the cage.
- Day 0, initial mass (grams) = the mass of the initial cohort of beetle larvae placed into the cage (co-variate)
- Abundance day 1-9 = number of larvae remaining in the cage via visual inspection (larvae/cage on day n)
- Number of 4th instars (d6-d9) = the number of fourth instars we observed on plants in a given cage 6, 7, 8, or 9d post-initiation of the trail.
- Number of larvae weighed (4d) = the number of larvae in a group that we used to estimate larval growth over the first 4d of each Trial.
- Group mass (4d)(grams) = the mass of the group of larvae from the “Number of larvae weighed (4d)” column
- average mass per beetle (4d)(grams) = Group mass dividide by number of larave weighed (4d)
- Total damage per cage = estimates of square cm of leaf tissue consumed by larvae during the first 4d of each trial.
- Prop., 4ths (d6-d9) = Number of 4th instars divivded by cage total of the same day.
- Sum beetle days 1-4 = Sum of larval abundance on days 1-4.
- Damage per beetle days (cm^2 damage/sum of beetle days 1-4) = Total damage per cage divided by sum of beetle days
- Number of emerged adults = number of new adult beetles emerging within each cage over the three weeks after the last larva was observed on a plant.
Notes:
- Missing cell values in Group Mass and Average Mass per beetle occur when there are no larvae in the cage to weigh. These cells should be left blank for analyses.
- Missing cell values in Prop 4ths (d6-d9) occur when the proportion of 4th instars and the number of larvae in the cage are both 0; 0/0=undefined. These cells should be left blank for analyses.
File 2: Ugine_et_al._2024_2
Column headings and their meaning
- Trial =two replicate tests of the same hypothesis (Trial 1 and Trial 2)
- Cage = identity of the field mesocosm
- Density = the number of first instar potato beetle larvae placed into the cage (larvae/cage)
- Provisioning = low are unprovisioned beetles, high were provided sibling eggs to consume
- Predator presence = Yes indicates we placed Podisus maculiventris in the cage, and No indicates no predators added to the cage.
- Day 0, initial mass = the mass of the initial cohort of beetle larvae placed into the cage (co-variate)
- Beetles per cage = count of live larvae per cage
- day = indicates what day the “Beetles per cage” were made on
- Proportion surviving = beetles per cage divided by density
Sharing/Access information
NA
Code/Software
We used JMP Pro V.16 to perform all of the statistical analyses. Our statistical approach is outlined in detail in the Statistical Methods section of the manuscript.
Methods
Using the herbivorous Colorado potato beetle and predaceous spined soldier bug system, we tested whether parental reproductive allocation shifts could compensate for reductions in the total number of eggs laid. In this system, mothers exposed to predators shift their reproductive investment to make fewer offspring with higher levels of provisioning. We tested 1) the individual and combined effects of larval density and condition on the number of offspring surviving to the last larval stage and emerging as adults, in the presence and absence of predators, 2) whether larval survival is density-dependent in the presence and absence of predators, and 3) whether density-dependent survival depended on larval condition. Lastly, 4) we measured larval feeding, growth, and development midway through the larval period to assess levels of competition and effects on plant damage.
We placed larval beetles from all combinations of density and condition treatments in field mesocosms with and without predators. We then measured the number of beetles surviving daily throughout larval development and adult emergence and assessed beetle growth and plant damage early in the experiment. These experiments allowed us to determine the consequences of reproductive allocation for the local beetle population (total number surviving) and survival during larval development when the offspring were reared with or without predators.