Skip to main content
Dryad

Data from: Prey responses to foxes are not determined by nativeness

Wooster, Eamonn1; Ramp, Daniel2; Lundgren, Erick3; Ben-Ami, Dror4; Bonsen, Gavin2; Carthey, Alexandra5; Carroll, Scott6; Geisler-Edge, Angelica7; Keynan, Oded8; Olek, Yael9; O'Neill, Adam10; Shanas, Uri9; Wallach, Arian11

Published Jan 08, 2024 on Dryad. https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.z08kprrkx

Data files

Jan 08, 2024 version files 49.32 KB

Abstract

Introduced predators are thought to be responsible for the decline and extinction of their native prey. The prey naivety hypothesis provides a mechanism for these declines, suggesting that native prey are vulnerable to introduced predators as their coevolutionary history is insufficiently long for antipredator behaviours to fully develop. The prey naivety hypothesis thus predicts that prey will be less responsive to introduced predators than to native predators. Australia’s endemic small mammals are thought to be vulnerable to predation by red foxes because they are less responsive to – or naive to – a predator with whom they have only co-occurred since the 19th century. To test whether nativeness determines antipredator behaviours we compared small mammal behavioural responses to fox scent outside (Australia) and inside the foxes’ native range (North America and Israel). We conducted giving-up density experiments in the deserts of these three regions and evaluated small mammal anti-predator responses to fox scent. To place these results in a broader context, we then integrated our results into a meta-analysis of studies assessing prey responsiveness to fox scent. All small mammals similarly increased their vigilance in response to fox scent, regardless of their coevolutionary history with foxes. Australian small mammals responded with greater wariness to fox scent, by decreasing time at food patches in response to fox scent more than Israeli and American small mammals did. However, we found no evidence that this behaviour influenced foraging as nut consumption was unaffected. Our meta-analysis revealed that globally, small mammals respond with similar wariness to fox scent regardless of whether foxes are their native predator. We found no evidence that Australian small mammals respond in a maladaptive manner, compared to the foxes’ native prey. Our results suggest that animals can develop antipredator behaviours to introduced predators to the same magnitude as native prey.