Data from: Intraspecific variation in mating behavior modulates the effects of mosquitofish introduction on prey communities
Data files
Jan 12, 2026 version files 69.84 KB
-
Eco_Effects_Sexual_Selection_Behavior.csv
24.01 KB
-
Eco_Effects_Sexual_Selection_EcoData.csv
20.90 KB
-
Eco_Effects_Sexual_Selection_Zoops.csv
21.04 KB
-
README.md
3.88 KB
Abstract
Intraspecific variation is recognized as a driver of ecological processes, yet prior studies have overwhelmingly focused on the ecological effects of intraspecific trait variation driven by natural selection. Far less is known about how variation in sexually selected traits influences ecological outcomes. In this study, we tested whether intraspecific differences in reproductive behaviors affect the ecosystem- and community-level impact of western mosquitofish (Gambusia affinis) introductions. Male mosquitofish frequently harass females through persistent mating attempts. We manipulated the intensity of male harassment, then used a mesocosm experiment to measure the ecological consequences of these differences in harassment. Although this behavior manipulation was short-lived, our results suggest that differences in harassment intensity affected zooplankton communities. Compared to fish-absent controls, mesocosms with high-harassment males had smaller zooplankton body size and reduced abundance in several dominant taxa. These effects were not observed in low-harassment treatments, suggesting a threshold response in which only high-harassment males elicited community changes. The presence of mosquitofish also caused a trophic cascade to impact phytoplankton biomass; however, the strength of this cascade was not altered by harassment intensity. Our findings demonstrate that sexual selection can shape community composition and shows that reproductive behavior can modulate the impact of species introduction.
https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.wpzgmsbzm
Description of the data and file structure
Data were collected from a mesocosm experiment to test for effects of variation in male mosquitofish harassment behavior on ecological patterns and processes. Male mosquitofish harassment behavior and various ecological variables were measured in each tank. Zooplankton were sampled in each tank and were identified and counted using microscopy after the experiment.
Files and variables
File: Eco_Effects_Sexual_Selection_Behavior.csv
Description: Male harassment behavior measurements
Variables
- tank: tank id
- date: date that measurement was taken
- day: days since start of mesocosm experiment
- timepoint: timepoint id
- treatment: male type-high harassment males (HH), low harassment males (LH)
- observer: observer id
- fish.color: color of observed fish's elastomer identification tag
- harass.time: time male spent harassing female fish during the observation period (seconds)
File: Eco_Effects_Sexual_Selection_EcoData.csv
Description: Ecosystem measurements
Variables
- tank.id: tank id
- treatment: male type-high harassment males (HH), low harassment males (LH), no fish and no zooplankton control (NZ), no fish control (NF)
- treatment.fish: treatment type- fish (F) or no fish (NF) added to mesocosm
- date: date that sample was collected
- timepoint: timepoint id
- day: days since start of mesocosm experiment
- pH: pH of tank
- dusk.temp: temperature at dusk measurement (C)
- dawn.temp: temperature at dawn measurement (C)
- ER: Ecosystem respiration (mg/L)
- NPP: Net primary production (mg/L)
- GPP: Gross primary production (mg/L)
- Avg chl ug/L: average of 3 chlorophyll measurements (ug/L)
File: Eco_Effects_Sexual_Selection_Zoops.csv
Description: Zooplankton measurements
Variables
- DateCounted: Date that sample was counted and zooplankton were identified
- Tank: tank id
- Treatment: treatment: male type-high harassment males (HH), low harassment males (LH), no fish and no zooplankton control (NZ), no fish control (NF)
- Timepoint: timepoint id
- Day: days since start of mesocosm experiment
- HarassTime: Sum of harassment times for 3 males observed within a tank (NA = not applicable for NF and NZ treatments, which did not contain fish to observe)
- Daphnia: Count of Daphnia in sample
- Cerio: Count of Ceriodaphnia in sample
- Bosmina: Count of Bosmina in sample
- Chydorid: Count of Chydorids in sample
- Calenoid: Count of Calenoid copepods in sample
- Cyclopoid: Count of Cyclopoid copepods in sample
- Nauplii: Count of copepod nauplii in sample
- MosquitoLarvae: Count of mosquito larvae in sample
- Chironomid: Count of Chironomids in sample
- MosquitoPupae: Count of mosquito pupae in sample
- Hydracarina: Count of hydracarina in sample
- Springtail: Count of springtails in sample
- ImmDaph: Count of Immature Daphnia in sample
- DivingBeetle: Count of diving beetles in sample
- Moinidae: Count of moinidae in sample
- MayflyNymph: Count of mayfly nymphs in sample
- StoneflyNymph: Count of stonefly nymphs in sample
- Ostracod: Count of ostracods in sample
- Backswimmer: Count of backswimmers in sample
- MeasurerName: Name of researcher who measured Daphnia in ImageJ
- DaphniaMeasuredCount: Number of Daphnia measured in a sample (maximum of 50 per sample)
- DaphLengthAvg: Average Daphnia length in sample (NA = not applicable if 0 Daphnia in sample)
- DaphLengthStDev: Standard deviation of Daphnia length in sample (NA = not applicable if 0 or 1 Daphnia in sample)
Code/software
Sofware to view data includes Microsoft Excel, R, and any program capable of opening .csv files.
