Data from: Breed differences in oral behaviors in feed-restricted dairy heifers
Data files
Jun 06, 2023 version files 69.13 KB
-
LFiH_Behavior_proportion_data_by_breed.csv
5.14 KB
-
README.pdf
63.99 KB
Dec 21, 2023 version files 71.98 KB
-
LFiH_Behavior_proportion_data_by_breed.csv
5.14 KB
-
README.md
2.86 KB
Abstract
Holsteins and Jerseys, the 2 most prominent dairy breeds in the United States, differ in many regards. They have not been evaluated for differences in oral behavior performance, despite anecdotal evidence that Jerseys perform more abnormal behaviors than Holsteins. As abnormal behaviors can indicate compromised welfare, we evaluated whether breed differences existed in year-old heifers. Because many oral behaviors could be expressed in abnormal ways, we also sought to describe performance of a wide range of behaviors and whether these varied among individuals. We studied 42 pair-housed heifers (33 Holstein, 9 Jersey) at 12.8 ± 1.1 mo of age (mean ± SD) that were restricted to 50% of their ad libitum total mixed ration (TMR) intake for 2 d as part of a short-term feed challenge. Using continuous video recording from 0800 to 2000 h on the second day of feed restriction, we scored time spent performing tongue rolling, tongue flicking, selfgrooming, allogrooming, intersucking, drinking urine, drinking water, and nonnutritive oral manipulation (NNOM) of rice hull bedding, the feed bin, or other pen fixtures. Eating TMR as recorded at 5-min intervals. We found that Jerseys spent more time tongue rolling (3.3% vs. 0.2% proportion of 12-h observations) and performing all types of NNOM than Holsteins (feed bin: 3.8% vs. 2.4%; bedding: 7.7% vs. 5.4%; other: 7.5% vs. 4.2%; total: 19.0% vs. 12.0%), and tended to spend more time tongue flicking (1.4% vs. 1.1%). Jerseys spent less time allogrooming than Holsteins (1.3% vs. 3.4%). There was no evidence of an effect of breed on self-grooming (2.0%), water drinking (1.0%), eating TMR (16.0%), or intersucking (0.06%). Urine drinking was performed by 9 total heifers and was not compared between breeds. All behaviors were highly variable across individuals, particularly tongue rolling and intersucking. Allogrooming was more variable than self-grooming, and each subcategory of NNOM was more variable than total NNOM. Outliers, or extreme performance of oral behaviors relative to the rest of our population, were present in most behaviors. Heifers who were outliers in one behavior were not consistently outliers in all. Overall, there are breed differences in many oral behaviors in a feed-restricted environment. Despite no difference in proportion of time spent eating, Jerseys often performed higher levels of potentially abnormal behaviors than Holsteins, though both breeds performed many oral behaviors, sometimes at extreme levels, that may indicate a concern.
Data were collected from 42 dairy heifers (Jerseys, n=9; Holsteins, n=33) that were approximately 13 mo old to evaluate whether there were breed differences in oral behaviors. Heifers were feed-restricted a total mixed ration (TMR) at 50% of their previous intake, similar to limit-feeding used on farm, for 2 d. On d 2 of this restriction, oral behavior (drinking water, drinking urine, intersucking, allogrooming, self-grooming, tongue rolling, tongue flicks, and non-nutritive manipulation of non-feed items) was scored continuously from 08:00-20:00. Eating was evaluated during this same period at 5-min scans.
Description of the data and file structure
- LFiH_Behavior proportion data by breed.csv; This file presents oral behavior data from all 42 heifers ("ID" column) and identifies them as Jerseys or Holsteins ("Breed" column). Behavior was scored from 08:00-20:00 on d 2 of a 2-d feed restriction. Time spent out of view was excluded, generating a proportion of time in view engaged in each behavior during the 12-h observation ("In view" column). Drinking water, drinking urine, intersucking, allogrooming ("groom: allo"), self-grooming, ("groom: self"), tongue rolling, tongue flicks, and non-nutritive oral manipulation of bedding ("NNOM: bedding"), feed bins ("NNOM: feed bin"), and other pen structures ("NNOM: other") were scored continuously and are presented as a proportion of time in view from 08:00-20:00. The column labeled “NNOM: Total” is “NNOM.bedding” + “NNOM.feed.bin” + “NNOM.other” to represent the total amount of time in view engaged in any non-nutritive manipulation. Eating was evaluated at 5-min scans and is reported as proportion of the total 12-h period, as "out of view" did not affect this behavior.
- Supplemental Table.pdf; This file presents a supplemental table ("Supplemental Table S1. Behavior model outputs") presenting the raw means, SE, and 95% CI for all oral behaviors scored, along with model outputs.
- LFiH_Heifer breed differences models and figures.Rmd; This RMarkdown file uses the .csv data file listed above to build and validate all models to describe breed differences in behavior and produce the figures used in the corresponding paper. The Rmd file can be downloaded and run in R, and is annotated.
- LFiH_Heifer breed differences models and figures.pdf; This file is the PDF output of the corresponding RMarkdown file, and includes the code and output previews. This file is annotated.
Code/Software
All analyses were run in R using RStudio. Software versions, including those for all packages used, are included in LFiH_Heifer breed differences models and figures.Rmd and the associated PDF export.
The methods are described in the associated research publication.
- Downey, Blair Caitlin; Tucker, Cassandra Blaine (2023), Data from: Breed differences in oral behaviors in feed-restricted dairy heifers, , Article, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7308642
- Downey, Blair C.; Tucker, Cassandra B. (2023), Breed differences in oral behaviors in feed-restricted dairy heifers, Journal of Dairy Science, Journal-article, https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2022-23208
