Skip to main content
Dryad

Data from: Adaptive benefits of group fission: evidence from blue monkeys

Abstract

Permanent group fissions are thought to represent the tipping point at which a group has become too large and therefore splits into two, allowing for an evaluation of the consequences of living in too large a group and if fission can alleviate those costs. We first examined how adult female activity budgets (feeding, moving, resting) differed among periods surrounding (i.e., before and after) multiple fission events, accounting for seasonal variation, and using five mixed-effects beta regression models. We then assessed how rates of agonism differed among periods surrounding these fission events using two negative binomial models, one examining all agonistic interactions and one focusing on agonistic interactions that were lost. Our third analysis used a generalized linear mixed model to investigate a female’s likelihood of conception in a given month, based on her individual characteristics, which post-fission group size she joined, and whether that month fell before vs. after fission, vs. neither. Finally, we used a mixed effects Cox proportional hazards model to evaluate the relationship between infant survival, whether the infant’s mother joined the small vs. large post-fission group, and whether the month in which the infant was born fell before vs. after fission vs. neither.  Here we present the three datasets used for these analyses, thus presenting individualized records of both behavioral and life history variables in relation to group fissions.