Skip to main content
Dryad

Data from: How to date a molecular phylogeny: Comparison of effective priors between node calibration and FBD

Capobianco, Alessio1; Darlim, Gustavo1; Höhna, Sebastian1

Published Mar 25, 2026 on Dryad. https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.0rxwdbsfj

Data files

Mar 25, 2026 version files 423.51 KB

Click names to download individual files

Abstract

Time-calibrating a phylogenetic tree is a fundamental step in phylogenetic inference, as it allows the study of macroevolutionary processes such as lineage diversification, trait evolution, and historical biogeography. To this end, the fossilized-birth-death (FBD) process, a stochastic process that coherently integrates fossils into phylogenies, is increasingly used as an alternative to traditional ad hoc node-calibration densities. However, the effective prior distribution on node ages induced by the FBD has never been investigated before, hindering an informed choice between the two approaches. Here, we analyze two empirical datasets (crocodylians and fireflies) by applying several models of time-calibration, including traditional node calibrations and FBD. We show that the effective node age priors induced by the FBD process in the absence of morphological data are comparable to those induced by uniform node calibrations with minimum equal to the age of the calibrating fossil, and maximum equal to the maximum age of the tree. Our exploration sheds light into how paleontological information is translated to node ages by the FBD process, and suggests that node calibration approaches remain an important alternative when the fossil record of the studied group is scarce and other prior information can be used to devise informative calibration densities.