Data and code from: Evaluating the effectiveness of lasers in deterring birds based on global systematic evidence
Data files
Jul 31, 2026 version files 6.92 MB
-
Analysis_code.R
61.98 KB
-
Analysis_report.html
4.29 MB
-
Dataset.csv
2.57 MB
-
README.md
4.76 KB
Abstract
Evidence-based interventions to reduce wildlife-caused property losses are essential for achieving sustainable coexistence between humans and wildlife. Since the 1970s, lasers have been used to safeguard various properties, including aircraft, agricultural fields, and energy infrastructure. However, their effectiveness has not been quantitatively evaluated using systematic evidence across different scenarios, which limits their broader application. Here, we compiled data from 159 experiments conducted worldwide and used meta-analytic approaches to evaluate the overall effectiveness of lasers in reducing bird occupancy. To facilitate management-relevant interpretation, we further assessed its scalability for subgroups of bird taxa, laser characteristics, and environmental conditions, based on the amount of evidence and statistical support. Our findings revealed the following: (i) although the primary objective of laser deterrents is to prevent property damage, the majority of experiments (96%) quantified effectiveness indirectly based on bird behavior rather than direct property-related outcomes; (ii) empirical evidence predominantly originated from wetlands, while data from airports were particularly scarce; (iii) laser operations reduced bird occupancy by 59%, though this deterrent effect gradually diminished after the cessation of laser use, resulting in a statistically non-significant persistence effect; (iv) Class 3B, green lasers, whether applied manually or automatically, were supported by considerable to moderate evidence for deterring waterfowls and songbirds, especially under low light conditions in natural field settings; and (v) existing evidence does not show clear habituation. Synthesis and applications: Our results indicate that laser deterrents represent a promising non-lethal intervention for mitigating human–bird conflicts across multiple scenarios. Future research may need to prioritize the development of automated laser applications, incorporate direct measurements of property-related outcomes, and expand experimental evaluations to include underrepresented taxa and high-impact scenarios. This would strengthen the evidence base for conservation and management applications. The dataset includes three files: "Dataset.csv" for the original data, "Analysis code.R" for the R code to analyze the original data, and "Analysis report.html" for the output of each R chunk generated by R Markdown.
Dataset DOI: 10.5061/dryad.15dv41pc4
Description of the data and file structure
The dataset includes three files: "Dataset.csv" for the original data, "Analysis code.R" for the R code to analyze the original data, and "Analysis report.html" for the output of each R chunk generated by R Markdown.
Files and variables
File: Analysis_code.R
Description: the R code to analyze the original data
File: Analysis_report.html
Description: the output of each R chunk generated by R Markdown.
File: Dataset.csv
Description: the original data
This table contains the whole data for reproducing the results in this study.
- Source: Data source of the study, including database searches, snowball searches, and opportunistic searches.
- Stage: Dataset version or submission stage.
- StudyID: Unique identifier for each independent study.
- DataID: Unique identifier for each extracted effect size or experimental comparison.
- ArticleTitle: Title of the original publication.
- 1_Duplicated: Duplicate screening result (0 = not duplicated; 1 = duplicated).
- 2_TitleAbstractScreen: Result of title and abstract screening.
- 3_PDFAvailability: Availability of full-text PDF.
- 4_WithData: Whether the study contained extractable data (1 = yes).
- BirdOrder: Taxonomic order of the bird species.
- BirdGenus: Genus name of the bird species.
- BirdGenusCommonName: Common name at the genus level.
- BirdSpecies: Scientific name of the bird species.
- BirdSpeciesCommonName: Common name of the bird species.
- BirdType: Origin of birds (e.g., wild, wild-caught).
- SiteType: Experimental or field site type.
- LaserModel: Model or name of the laser device used.
- LaserColor: Color of the laser beam.
- LaserColorDetails: Wavelength of the laser (nm).
- LaserPowerMW: Laser output power (mW).
- LaserClass: Laser safety classification.
- LaserMode: Operation mode of the laser (manual or automatic).
- LightCondition: Ambient light condition during laser operation.
- LightConditionDetails: Detailed description of light conditions.
- Habituation: Whether birds showed habituation to laser treatment.
- HabituationDetails: Description of habituation responses.
- OperationDay: Duration of laser operation (days).
- OperationDayDescription: Detailed description of laser operation period.
- LightEffect: Description of the effect of light condition on effectiveness.
- Cost-benefit: Information on economic costs and benefits of laser use.
- OutcomeType: Type of biological response measured.
- Indicator: Specific response indicator used to quantify laser effectiveness.
- DataLocation: Location where data were extracted from the publication (e.g., text, table, figure).
- TreatmentEffectDesign: Experimental design for estimating treatment effects.
- Before/controlSampleSize: Sample size before treatment or in the control group.
- Before/controlMean: Mean value before treatment or in the control group.
- Before/controlSD: Standard deviation before treatment or in the control group.
- TreatmentSampleSize: Sample size after laser treatment.
- TreatmentMean: Mean response value after laser treatment.
- TreatmentSD: Standard deviation after laser treatment.
- TreatmentEffect: Reported or calculated effect of laser treatment.
- TreatmentEffectRR: Response ratio (RR) comparing treatment and control conditions.
- TreatmentEffectLnRR: Natural logarithm of the response ratio.
- TreatmentEffectLnRRVariance: Variance of LnRR used for meta-analysis.
- PersistenceEffectDesign: Experimental design for evaluating persistence effects after laser removal.
- AfterSampleSize: Sample size after cessation of laser treatment.
- AfterMean: Mean response after cessation of laser treatment.
- AfterSD: Standard deviation after cessation of laser treatment.
- PersistenceEffect: Remaining deterrence effect after laser operation ceased.
- PersistenceEffectLnRR: Log response ratio for persistence effects.
- PersistenceEffectLnRRVariance: Variance of persistence effect LnRR.
- Country: Country where the study was conducted.
- PublicationYear: Year of publication.
- PublicationYearClassification: Categorized publication period.
- Publication Type: Type of publication.
- Authors: Authors of the original publication.
- Abstract: Abstract of the original publication.
- Source Title: Journal or source title.
- DOI: Digital Object Identifier of the publication.
- Document Type: Type of document.
Code/software
R software
Access information
Other publicly accessible locations of the data:
- no
Data was derived from the following sources:
- no
