Skip to main content
Dryad

Data and code from: Local conspecific density affects the relationship between species abundance and plant-soil feedback in a subtropical forest

Data files

Oct 01, 2026 version files 19.11 KB

Click names to download individual files

Abstract

Increasing evidence suggests that plant-soil feedback (PSF) is essential in shaping species abundance and promoting the coexistence of common and rare species. Yet, empirical studies have yielded inconsistent results regarding the relationship between species abundance and PSF strength. To reconcile the debate on the species abundance–PSF relationship (SAPR), we propose a conceptual framework that decomposes PSF into two components: PSF1 caused by the focal tree and PSF2 caused by the nearby conspecific neighbors. These two components drive community assembly and diversity maintenance processes, respectively. Moreover, our framework emphasizes that local species density is critical for measuring species PSF in natural communities. We then conducted a shade-house experiment involving 14 subtropical tree species to test the SAPR in a subtropical forest. We found a significant negative relationship between species abundance and PSF only when inoculum soils were collected from areas with high local conspecific density. The fungal pathogens in the soil and roots were identified as the key driver of this pattern. Our study provides direct experimental evidence that local conspecific density affects the SAPR, which may clarify discrepancies across studies and advance our understanding of how PSF contributes to species coexistence in forest ecosystems. Integrating a conceptual framework with a multi-species soil inoculation PSF experiment, we reveal intensifying negative PSF from rare to common species in a subtropical forest community, with local density influencing this pattern. Consequently, our study suggests that the intricate relationship between species abundance and PSF is closely implicated in the dynamics of local species coexistence. We propose that previous controversies regarding the SAPR primarily stemmed from the neglect of local species density and the confusion of distinct ecological processes across studies.