Mammals with large home ranges, low reproductive rates, and small body sizes are most vulnerable to roads: A meta-analysis
Data files
Oct 03, 2025 version files 287.45 KB
-
Articles-Excluded-at-Full-Text.xlsx
151.30 KB
-
Full_Mammal-Responses-to-Roads.xlsx
70.90 KB
-
README.md
6.71 KB
-
Subset_Mammal_Responses-to-Roads.xlsx
58.55 KB
Abstract
In a previous meta-analysis, mammals with large home ranges, low reproductive rates, and large body sizes were found to respond most negatively to roads. However, due to correlations among these traits, it is not known whether these responses were due to a subset or all three traits. We conducted a multiple meta-regression of the effects of species traits on mammal responses to roads, using data from 92 studies, to determine whether an analysis with a larger sample size and controlling for correlations among traits will support the previous findings. The results reinforce the findings that mammals with larger home ranges and lower reproductive rates respond more negatively to roads. Surprisingly, we found that when controlling for the effects of home range size and reproductive rate, larger mammals respond less negatively to roads than smaller mammals. We speculate that the positive effect of body size is due to driver avoidance of collisions with larger mammals and/or differences in road attraction and car avoidance behaviors of larger vs. smaller species that allow larger mammals to extract benefits of roads while avoiding oncoming vehicles. We also found high variability of individual responses to roads, above what could be explained by the species traits model, most likely due to site and/or species-specific characteristics. Synthesis and applications: Road mitigation for mammals should ideally be informed by site level knowledge and generally involve prioritizing species with the combination of larger home ranges, lower reproductive rates, and smaller body sizes. To protect these vulnerable mammals from roads, we should maintain low road densities and install small-mesh mitigation fencing along roads. This differs from current road mitigation efforts which are typically targeted towards large mammals (e.g., large-mesh fencing along roads) and are often ineffective for smaller mammals.
Dataset DOI: 10.5061/dryad.1g1jwsv9v
Description of the data and file structure
We conducted a meta-analysis of the effects of species traits on mammal population responses to roads. We first updated the literature search by Rytwinski and Fahrig (2012) with recent literature that quantified a relationship between roads and mammal population abundance. Following screening at title/abstract and at full-text, we extracted the information needed to calculate an effect size from all included studies. We adjusted sample sizes to allow for a comparable weighting of effect sizes across the studies included in the meta-analysis. We reduced multiple non-independent effect sizes from the same study. We then collected information on species traits (home range size, reproductive rate, body mass) for all species for which a road effect could be calculated.
Files and variables
File: Full_Mammal-Responses-to-Roads.xlsx
Description: In this file, we provide the full dataset used to conduct the global meta-analysis. Please note that cells with ‘n/a’ represent that the information was not available, e.g., when no information could be found for a species trait because the trait value was missing from the species trait database, and the information could not be found when searching additional online resources.
Variables
- Dataset_ID: Individual road impact on mammal population abundance
- STUDY_ID: An independent publication
- Study_Name: Citation of publication
- Country: The name of the country in which the study was conducted
- Biome: The biome in which the study was conducted
- TemperateTropical: The study was conducted in a temperate or tropical region
- Species_Name: The scientific name of the species
- Study_Design: The study design of the dataset, coded here as: (1) Landscape or region, (2) Home range vs. random, (3) Presence plot vs. random, (4) Distance from road (multiple distances), (5) Road near vs. far, (6) Road present vs. absent
- Road_Category: Road category of the road exposure evaluated, coded as: (1) 4-lane or more, paved, divided highways, (2) 2-lane paved roads, (3) 1-lane paved roads or unpaved roads, and (4) a combination of multiple road categories
- ESr: The correlation coefficient (effect size)
- ES_Zr: The z-transformed correlation coefficient
- SE: The standard error of the effect size
- V: The variance of the z-transformed correlation coefficient
- N: The adjusted sample size
- W: The inverse variance weight
- N_Minimum: Sample size was set to the minimum for inclusion in the meta-analysis (Y = yes; N = no)
- Order: The taxonomic order of the species
- Family: The taxonomic family of the species
- Repro_Rate: Reproductive rate; the median number of offspring per litter per female multiplied by the median number of litters per female per year
- Repro_Rate_Extrapolated: Reproductive rate estimated (by averaging across closely taxonomically related species) for species with missing values
- Mobility_km2: Home range size (km2); the median area within which daily movements of individuals of both sexes occur
- Mobility_km2_Extrapoloated: Home range size (km2) estimated (by averaging across closely taxonomically related species) for species with missing values
- Mass_g: Body mass (g); the median body mass of adult individuals of both sexes.
- Mass_g_Extrapolated: Body mass (g) estimated (by averaging across closely taxonomically related species) for species with missing values
- Complete_LH: Values for all species traits (reproductive rate, home range, body mass) were available (Y = Yes; N = No)
- Trophic_Group: Trophic group classification as herbivore (1), omnivore (2), or carnivore (3)
File: Subset_Mammal_Responses-to-Roads.xlsx
Description: In this file, we provide the subset of data for species for which complete species trait information could be collected, used to conduct the species traits meta-regressions.
Variables
- Dataset_ID: Individual road impact on mammal population abundance
- STUDY_ID: An independent publication
- Study_Name: Citation of publication
- Country: The name of the country in which the study was conducted
- Biome: The biome in which the study was conducted
- TemperateTropical: The study was conducted in a temperate or tropical region
- Species_Name: The scientific name of the species
- Study_Design: The study design of the dataset, coded here as: (1) Landscape or region, (2) Home range vs. random, (3) Presence plot vs. random, (4) Distance from road (multiple distances), (5) Road near vs. far, (6) Road present vs. absent
- Road_Category: Road category of the road exposure evaluated, coded as: (1) 4-lane or more, paved, divided highways, (2) 2-lane paved roads, (3) 1-lane paved roads or unpaved roads, and (4) a combination of multiple road categories
- ESr: The correlation coefficient (effect size)
- ES_Zr: The z-transformed correlation coefficient
- SE: The standard error of the effect size
- V: The variance of the z-transformed correlation coefficient
- N: The adjusted sample size
- W: The inverse variance weight
- N_Minimum: Sample size was set to the minimum for inclusion in the meta-analysis (Y = yes; N = no)
- Order: The taxonomic order of the species
- Family: The taxonomic family of the species
- Repro_Rate: Reproductive rate; the median number of offspring per litter per female multiplied by the median number of litters per female per year
- Mobility_km2: Home range size (km2); the median area within which daily movements of individuals of both sexes occur
- Mass_g: Body mass (g); the median body mass of adult individuals of both sexes.
- Complete_LH: Values for all species traits (reproductive rate, home range, body mass) were available (Y = Yes; N = No)
- Trophic_Group: Trophic group classification as herbivore (1), omnivore (2), or carnivore (3)
File: Articles-Excluded-at-Full-Text.xlsx
Description: In this file, we provide a list of all articles excluded during the full-text screening or data extraction stage of the review. Please note that cells with ‘n/a’ represent that the information was not available, e.g., when no date for the article was published could be found.
Variables
- Full citation: The article's full reference
- Title: The article's title
- Author: The author(s) of the article
- Year: Year of publication
- Language: Language in which the main text is written
- FT Screening Outcome: Reason for the article being excluded at full-text screening
