Data from: Plant responses to light competition: Does evolutionary history matter?
Data files
Apr 18, 2025 version files 60.45 KB
-
First_et_al._Data.xlsx
57.06 KB
-
README.md
3.39 KB
Abstract
Plants can respond to light-competition cues with sets of plastic responses that provide either shade avoidance or tolerance, and were suggested to match these strategies to the competition scenarios they experience. However, little is known about the effect of plants' evolutionary history on their ability to shift between these strategies. To fill this knowledge gap, we performed a common-garden experiment that examined shade avoidance and tolerance responses of the winter annual plant Hymenocarpos circinnatus to a variety of simulated light-competition scenarios, including different heights and densities of surrounding vegetation. These responses were compared across plants originating from six populations along a climatic gradient; from a semi-arid region, where light competition is relatively weak and homogenous, to a mesic-Mediterranean region, where light competition is stronger and more heterogenous. In most of the studied traits, including those related to shade avoidance, such as vertical elongation, or to shade tolerance, such as photosynthetic efficiency, we found no evidence for differences among H. circinnatus populations in the extent of their shade avoidance or tolerance responses to light competition. Interestingly, however, regardless of their evolutionary history, H. circinnatus were more responsive to cues of neighbor density rather than height in both shade tolerance and avoidance traits. Moreover, we found differences among populations in mean values of some of the studied traits across treatments, particularly in the onset of flowering and internode length, which are related to aridity adaptations to the shorter and unpredictable growth season in the more arid sites. The little divergence we found in light-competition responses across populations along the climatic gradient might reflect low costs of plasticity in these traits in H. circinnatus. Moreover, our results indicate that procumbent plants such as H. circinnatus might respond more to lateral competition cues that indicate neighbor density than to vertical cues that indicate neighbor height, thus highlighting the need to incorporate the two types of cues when studying plastic responses of plants to competition.
Dataset DOI: 10.5061/dryad.280gb5n1t
Description of the data and file structure
We performed a common-garden experiment where we measured varying shade avoidance and tolerance responses of the winter annual plant Hymenocarpos circinnatus, under five light-competition treatments that simulated different heights and densities of a surrounding vegetation. These responses were compared across plants originating from six populations along a climatic gradient, from a semi-arid to a mesic-Mediterranean region.
Files and variables
File: First et al. Data.xlsx
Description:
Variables
- Plant ID: ID number of the pot and individual plant.
- Block: a random factor with the 10 experimental blocks, according to which the plants were arranged on the experimental benches, each containing the five treatment combinations and the six populations.
- Population: a random factor with the six populations of origin.
- Annual precipitation: a covariate that provides mean annual rainfall (mm)
- Neighbor height: a fixed factor with three treatments (control, short, or tall).
- Neighbor density: a fixed factor with three treatments (control, sparse, or dense).
- height:diameter ratio: a dependent variable, measured as the ratio between the height and diameter of H. circinnatus.
- Leaf angle: a dependent variable, visually estimated for the leaves of H. circinnatus and categorized as either 0, 45 or 90° relative to the horizontal plane (°).
- Branching intensity: a dependent variable, measured as as the number of active meristems (branches) relative to total meristem number per stem (branched nodes plus un-branched nodes) of H. circinnatus.
- Stem-base diameter: a dependent variable, measured as mean diameter of the two main stems of *H. circinnatus *(cm).
- Internode length: a dependent variable, measured as the ratio of stem length to the number of internodes of *H. circinnatus *(cm).
- SLA (specific leaf area): a dependent variable, measured as the ratio of leaf surface area to leaf dry mass of *H. circinnatus *(cm^2 / g).
- Leaf area: a dependent variable, measured as the leaf surface area of *H. circinnatus *(cm^2).
- Amax (maximal photosynthetic rate): a dependent variable, estimated by fitting the carbon assimilation measurements for each H. circinnatus plant with light response curves using the Mitscherlich function (μmol / (s * m^2)).
- Aqe (apparent quantum efficiency): a dependent variable, estimated by fitting the carbon assimilation measurements for each H. circinnatus plant with light response curves using the Mitscherlich function.
- LCP (light compensation point): a dependent variable, estimated by fitting the carbon assimilation measurements for each H. circinnatus plant with light response curves using the Mitscherlich function (μmol / (s * m^2)).
- Shoot mass: a dependent variable, measured as shoot dry mass of H. circinnatus (g).
- inflorescence number: a dependent variable, measured as the number of H. circinnatus inflorescences at the time of harvest.
Blank cells represent unavailable data.
Code/software
Microsoft Excel / Google Sheets
Access information
Mean annual rainfall (1990-2020) provided by the Israel Meteorological Service Archives.
