Data and code from: A global meta-analysis demonstrating the effectiveness of nature-based coastal protection
Data files
Nov 04, 2026 version files 324.09 KB
-
Abundance_Final.csv
127.52 KB
-
DataAnalysis.Rmd
95.18 KB
-
DataAnalysis.Rproj
205 B
-
Diversity_Final.csv
36.82 KB
-
README.md
8.78 KB
-
SC_Final.csv
55.60 KB
Abstract
This dataset includes the data and code needed to replicate all analyses and figure generation for the publication: "A global meta-analysis on the effectiveness of nature-based coastal protection interventions".
There is growing global interest in using nature-based solutions for coastal resilience. Yet, widescale implementation is hindered by existing uncertainty about the general effectiveness and ecological benefits of these approaches. To address this uncertainty, we conducted a global meta-analysis of 43 peer-reviewed studies investigating nature-based coastal protection (NBCP) approaches, a subset of nature-based solutions that combine hard structures with biogenic habitats, to determine whether they are effective at reducing shoreline erosion while safeguarding species abundance and diversity. We found that NBCP approaches were effective at reducing erosion, providing superior erosion reduction when compared to natural reference shorelines and similar erosion protection when compared to conventional shoreline protection approaches (i.e., bulkheads, riprap revetments). Additionally, unlike conventional shoreline protection approaches, which have been previously shown to have ecological consequences, we found that NBCP approaches supported higher species abundance and similar diversity to natural reference shorelines. Altogether, our findings support the adoption of NBCP approaches as a viable alternative to conventional shoreline protection infrastructure.
Dataset DOI: 10.5061/dryad.37pvmcw03
Description of the data and file structure
Files and variables
File: Abundance_Final.csv
Description: Dataset for the organismal abundance meta-analysis.
Variables
- MetricCategory: Indication of the broad meta-analysis category- i.e., shoreline change, organismal abundance, or biodiversity
- ES: Unique ID for each individual effect size
- StudyID: Unique ID for each peer-reviewed paper
- CommonES: An indication of whether two or more effect sizes share a common control or experimental condition- i.e., the same number within a study indicates that those effect sizes share a reference or experimental condition
- FullCitation: The full citation for the peer-reviewed article from which the data was extracted
- PublicationYear: The year the article was published
- Journal: The journal where the article was published
- Continent: The continent where the work was done
- Latitude: The approximate latitude where the work was done
- Longitude: The approximate longitude where the work was done
- StudyTypeModerator: A categorical indication of study type - i.e., experimental or observational
- NBSDescription: A qualitative description of the NBCP type, often taken directly from the text
- NBSModerator: A categorical indication of NBCP type - i.e., soft or hard
- MetricNotes: A qualitative description of the original response metric and units
- MetricModerator: A categorical indication of the response metric - i.e., density, cover, or biomass
- FaunalGroupNotes: A qualitative description of the faunal group sampled
- FaunalGroupModerator: A categorical indication of the faunal group sampled - i.e., infauna, epifauna, flora, nekton, other
- LocationNotes: A qualitative description of where sampling was conducted along the shoreline
- LocationModerator: A categorical indication of where sampling was conducted- i.e., on the NBCP structure itself ("On"), behind the structure in the intertidal ("Behind"), or in front of the structure in the subtidal ("Front")
- PrecisionType: The type of error that is reported
- ComparatorNotes: A qualitative description of the reference shoreline
- ComparatorModerator: A categorical indication of the reference shoreline - i.e., control or hardened
- NBS_value: The mean value for the NBCP intervention, where higher values correspond with higher abundances
- NBS_precision: The precision value for the NBCP intervention
- NBS_N: The sample size for the NBCP intervention
- Comparator_value: The mean value for the comparator shoreline, where higher values correspond with higher abundances
- Comparator_precision: The precision value for the comparator shoreline
- Comparator_N: The sample size for the comparator shoreline
- DataSource: A qualitative description of where in the article data were pulled from
- Notes: A detailed qualitative description of how data were extracted and any salient decisions that were made
File: DataAnalysis.Rmd
Description: Code used to generate all analyses, figures, and tables.
File: Diversity_Final.csv
Variables
- MetricCategory: Indication of the broad meta-analysis category - i.e., shoreline change, organismal abundance, or biodiversity
- ES: Unique ID for each individual effect size
- StudyID: Unique ID for each peer-reviewed paper
- CommonES: An indication of whether two or more effect sizes share a common control or experimental condition- i.e., the same number within a study indicates that those effect sizes share a reference or experimental condition
- FullCitation: The full citation for the peer-reviewed article from which the data was extracted
- PublicationYear: The year the article was published
- Journal: The journal where the article was published
- Continent: The continent where the work was done
- Latitude: The approximate latitude where the work was done
- Longitude: The approximate longitude where the work was done
- StudyTypeModerator: A categorical indication of study type - i.e., experimental or observational
- NBSDescription: A qualitative description of the NBCP type, often taken directly from the text
- NBSModerator: A categorical indication of NBCP type- i.e., soft or hard
- MetricNotes: A qualitative description of the original response metric and units
- MetricModerator: A categorical indication of the response metric - i.e., Richness, Diversity, Evenness, TaxonomicDistinctness
- FaunalGroupNotes: A qualitative description of the faunal group sampled
- FaunalGroupModerator: A categorical indication of the faunal group sampled - i.e., infauna, epifauna, flora, nekton, other
- LocationNotes: A qualitative description of where sampling was conducted along the shoreline
- LocationModerator: A categorical indication of where sampling was conducted- i.e., on the NBCP structure itself ("On"), behind the structure in the intertidal ("Behind"), or in front of the structure in the subtidal ("Front")
- ComparatorNotes: A qualitative description of the reference shorelines
- ComparatorModerator: A categorical indication of the reference shoreline - i.e., control or hardened
- PrecisionType: The type of error that is reported
- NBS_value: The mean value for the NBCP intervention, where higher values correspond with high diversity
- NBS_precision: The precision value for the NBCP intervention
- NBS_N: The sample size for the NBCP intervention
- Comparator_value: The mean value for the comparator shoreline, where higher values correspond with higher diversity
- Comparator_precision: The precision value for the comparator shoreline
- Comparator_N: The sample size for the comparator shoreline
- DataSource: A qualitative description of where in the article data were pulled from
- Notes: A detailed qualitative description of how data were extracted and any salient decisions that were made
File: DataAnalysis.Rproj
Description: R Project File
File: SC_Final.csv
Variables
- MetricCategory: Indication of the broad meta-analysis category - i.e., shoreline change, organismal abundance, or biodiversity
- ES: Unique ID for each individual effect size
- StudyID: Unique ID for each peer-reviewed paper
- CommonES: An indication of whether two or more effect sizes share a common control or experimental condition- i.e., the same number within a study indicates that those effect sizes share a reference or experimental condition
- FullCitation: The full citation for the peer-reviewed article from which the data was extracted
- PublicationYear: The year the article was published
- Journal: The journal where the article was published
- Continent: The continent where the work was done
- Latitude: The approximate latitude where the work was done
- Longitude: The approximate longitude where the work was done
- StudyTypeModerator: A categorical indication of study type - i.e., experimental or observational
- NBSDescription: A qualitative description of the NBCP type, often taken directly from the text
- NBSModerator: A categorical indication of NBCP type - i.e., soft or hard
- MetricNotes: A qualitative description of the original response metric and units
- MetricModerator: A categorical indication of the response metric - i.e., LateralErosion or VerticalErosion
- LocationNotes: A qualitative description of where sampling was conducted along the shoreline
- LocationModerator: A categorical indication of where sampling was conducted - i.e., Intertidal or Subtidal
- ComparatorNotes: A qualitative description of the reference shorelines
- ComparatorModerator: A categorical indication of the reference shoreline - i.e., control or hardened
- PrecisionType: The type of error that is reported
- NBS_value: The mean value for the NBCP intervention, where positive values indicate accretion and negative values indicate erosion
- NBS_precision: The precision value for the NBCP intervention
- NBS_N: The sample size for the NBCP intervention
- Comparator_value: The mean value for the comparator shoreline, where positive values indicate accretion and negative values indicate erosion
- Comparator_precision: The precision value for the comparator shoreline
- Comparator_N: The sample size for the comparator shoreline
- DataSource: A qualitative description of where in the article data were pulled from
- Notes: A detailed qualitative description of how data were extracted and any salient decisions that were made
Code/software
Data analysis can be replicated in R software.
Access information
Other publicly accessible locations of the data:
- N/A
Data was derived from the following sources:
- Peer-reviewed publications
