Skip to main content
Dryad

Data from: Unraveling antler progression progression in desert mule deer: implications for common management practices.

Data files

Oct 01, 2026 version files 70.87 KB

Click names to download individual files

Abstract

Antler characteristics are widely used in the management of cervids, including as criteria for harvest and selective culling, yet longitudinal data describing how antler characteristics change as individual animals age remain limited for mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus). This dataset contains repeated antler measurements from 54 known-age male mule deer monitored on the privately owned Apache Ranch near Van Horn, Texas, USA. Individual bucks were identified using uniquely identifiable ear tags and were monitored across multiple age classes, allowing changes in antler size and morphology to be tracked within individuals through time.

The dataset is organized with one row representing the antler measurements of one individual at a particular age. Consequently, individuals monitored for multiple years occur in multiple rows representing successive age classes. Variables include individual identification, age, gross and estimated Boone and Crockett (B&C) scores, numbers of typical and scorable antler points, inside spread, right and left main-beam lengths, individual typical tine measurements (G1–G4), circumference measurements (H1–H4), abnormal point measurements, and antler mass measurements. Linear antler measurements and B&C scores are reported in inches, generally to the nearest 1/8 inch.

Antler measurements were obtained from images collected using cameras positioned at supplemental feeders and were made by a certified Boone and Crockett scorer. The study population occurred on private property and had access to supplemental feed throughout the year; these conditions should be considered when comparing antler development with other free-ranging mule deer populations.

The repeated-measures structure of the dataset allows users to evaluate individual antler progression with age, variation among individuals, age-specific antler characteristics, antler asymmetry, development of typical and abnormal points, and relationships among different measures of antler size. The data may also be useful for comparative studies and meta-analyses of antler development, cervid growth, harvest criteria, and age-related changes in antler morphology. Individual identifiers are animal identification codes and do not contain personally identifiable information. Exact locations of individual animals are not provided, and the dataset contains no human-subject data.