Data from: Disentangling complex relationships and disjunctions in western Camassia: Integrating multiple criteria to resolve taxonomic boundaries
Data files
Nov 03, 2025 version files 77.10 KB
-
Camassia_SSR_Data_Kephart_etal_2025.xlsx
72.54 KB
-
README.md
4.56 KB
Abstract
In a changing world, understanding variability helps sustain landscapes and develop effective species concepts for resolving difficult groups. To unravel puzzling relationships and range disjunctions, we applied morphometrics, phenology, phylogenetics, and population genetics in Camassia species with cultural, ecological, and conservation value, asking: Do the unusual Camassia populations in northeastern California represent previously unrecognized, disjunct C. howellii? Do C. howellii, C. leichtlinii, and C. quamash maintain diagnostic features in allopatry or sympatry? Are C. quamash ssp. breviflora and C. quamash ssp. linearis taxonomically distinct? We evaluated 34 Camassia populations in-situ for morphometric traits, phenology, and habitat type, collecting tissue for population microsatellite and phylogenetic analyses (rpl16, trnD-trnT). Fieldwork and genetic analyses of Camassia species allowed hypothesis-testing of all criteria. Populations of Oregon and California C. howellii shared 94-95% morphospace but differed significantly from C. leichtlinii and C. quamash, primarily in having more basal leaves, sub-globose fruits, and smaller flowers that open in mid-late afternoon, closing at sunset without reopening. Both microsatellite and phylogenetic data indicated separation of the three species, with slight genetic differentiation between the disjunct populations of C. howellii. Subspecies of C. quamash differ morphologically and genetically, with clear phylogenetic separation. Integrative approaches proved effective, affirming disputed species identities and upholding subspecific status for C. quamash ssp. linearis. For C. howellii, population genetic differentiation between disjunct regions appears congruent with phylogenetic analyses. Slight morphological differentiation of Oregon and California populations is consistent with geographic isolation, implying subspecific genetic divergence worthy of future study.
Dataset DOI: 10.5061/dryad.3n5tb2rw0
Description of the data and file structure
In this file are figures and tables related to the genetic and morphology study of western Camassia species in Oregon and Northern California. These items are referenced in the manuscript as Supplemental Information 2 and Dryad Figures. This information is available through Zenondo. The raw microsatellite data file is available on Dryad.
Files and variables
File: Camassia_SSR_Data_Kephart_etal_2025.xlsx
Description: Excel file of the microsatellite data for 13 loci across Camassia species and populations. Contact theresa.culley@uc.edu for questions.
File: AppendixS2__FigS1.pdf
Description: PDF file of Figure S1 in the supplemental appendix. Morphometric PCA plot of 10 informative flowering traits in paired analysis of C. howellii and putative C. howellii versus C. leichtlinii ssp. suksdorfii.
File: AppendixS2__FigS2.pdf
Description: PDF file of Figure S2 in the supplemental appendix. Morphometric PCA plot of flowering plants in the California Floristic Province for nine informative traits in paired analysis of C. howellii, putative C. howellii, and C. quamash ssp. breviflora.
File: AppendixS2__FigS3.pdf
Description: PDF file of Figure S3 in the supplemental appendix. Morphometric PCA plot of of flowering plants in broad-ranging western sites for 10 flowering traits in paired analysis of C. howellii, putative C. howellii in California, and C. quamash ssp. breviflora.
File: AppendixS2__FigS4.pdf
Description: PDF file of Figure S4 in the supplemental appendix. Morphometric PCA plot of informative fruiting traits in a paired analysis of C. howellii, putative C. howellii in California, and C. leichtlinii.
File: AppendixS2__FigS5AB.pdf
Description: PDF file of Figure S5A and S5B in the supplemental appendix. Morphometric PCA plot of informative fruiting traits of C. howellii, putative C*. howellii in California,* and C. quamash ssp. breviflora.
File: AppendixS2__FigS6.pdf
Description: PDF file of Figure S6 in the supplemental appendix. Morphometric PCA plot of nine informative flowering traits for putative C. howellii in California, C. howellii, C. leichtlinii ssp. suksdorfii, C. quamash ssp. breviflora.
File: AppendixS2__FigS7AB.pdf
Description: PDF file of Figure S7A AND S7B in the supplemental appendix. Morphometric PCA plots of fruiting traits of C. quamash.
File: AppendixS2__FigS8.pdf
Description: PDF file of Figure S8 in the supplemental appendix. Genetic Principal Coordinates Analysis (PCoA) plots of C. quamash ssp. linearis and C. q. ssp breviflora.
File: DryadFig_D1.pdf
Description: PDF file of Figure D1 in the Dryad set of figures. Morphometric PCA plot of seven informative fruiting traits, based on analysis of all five Oregon C. howellii sites.
File: DryadFig_D2.pdf
Description: PDF file of Figure D2 in the Dryad set of figures. All dates and sites for estimating floral time span of open (green) or closed (grey) flowers in 17 populations of NE California and SW Oregon Camassia.
File: DryadFig_D3.pdf
Description: PDF file of Figure D3 in the Dryad set of figures. Morphometric PCA plot of flowering traits for sites in the CFP of California and Oregon with putative C. howellii, C. howellii, C. leichtlinii ssp. suksdorfii, and C. quamash ssp. breviflora.
File: DryadFig_D4.pdf
Description: PDF file of Figure D4 in the Dryad set of figures. Genetic Principal Coordinate Analysis (PCoA) by population including all individuals of C. quamash ssp. linearis and C. q. ssp. breviflora in the California Floristic Province.
File: DryadFig_D5.pdf
Description: PDF file of Figure D5 in the Dryad set of figures. Morphometric PCA plots of C. quamash fruiting traits.
File: HogueMeadow_Cqwalpolei-IMG_2967.jpg
Description: Images of Camassia quamash subspecies walpolei
Code/software
Files are in PDF format, generated originally from PowerPoint via R analyses.
Access information
Other publicly accessible locations of the data:
- None
Data was derived from the following sources:
- R software
