Varying hydraulic strategies within leaves, stems, and roots of coexisting desert shrubs
Data files
Jul 31, 2026 version files 13.97 KB
-
Data_origin.csv
6.85 KB
-
Data_summary.csv
1.63 KB
-
README.md
5.48 KB
Abstract
Effective and continuous root-to-leaf hydraulic transport is crucial for plant survival and growth during drought. However, the capacity to resist hydraulic dysfunction remains understudied in leaves and roots, especially for desert shrubs. This limitation seriously constrains a comprehensive understanding of shrub hydraulic strategies for drought adaptation and impairs our ability to predict shrub future dynamics under climate change. Here, based on field experiments, hydraulic vulnerability curves, pressure-volume curves, and related functional traits were measured for leaves, stems, and roots of three coexisting shrub species (Haloxylon ammodendron, Nitraria sphaerocarpa, and Calligonum mongolicum) in a typical oasis-desert ecotone. Stomatal responses were also integrated to provide a comprehensive evaluation. Haloxylon ammodendron and N. sphaerocarpa exhibited hydraulic vulnerability segmentation along the leaf–stem–root continuum to protect their carbon-intensive stems, with roots serving as ‘safety valves’ that prevent water backflow into dry soil. In contrast, the hydraulic vulnerability segmentation patterns of C. mongolicum varied with drought intensity: leaves acted as ‘safety valves’ to suppress excessive transpirational water loss at the initial drought, whereas under severe drought, stems were firstly sacrificed to maintain root hydraulic function. Across all three species, the relationship between hydraulic safety and efficiency differed between organs. Stems exhibited a weak safety–efficiency trade-off, whereas roots with greater cavitation resistance were associated with higher transport efficiency. This divergence may be associated with the contrasting local microenvironments (air vs. soil) and distinct physiological functions of stems and roots. Notably, each of the three coexisting species has evolved a divergent suite of hydraulic advantages to compensate for its limitations and ensure survival. Our results, thus, highlight the importance of analyzing plant hydraulic strategies from both multi-organ and multi-trait perspectives, which not only promotes more accurate understanding of shrubs’ drought adaptation mechanisms, but also provides scientific insights for enhancing ecological restoration and optimizing ecohydrological models in drylands.
Dataset DOI: 10.5061/dryad.3tx95x6xx
Description of the data and file structure
The three dominant shrub species (Haloxylon ammodendron, Nitraria sphaerocarpa, and Calligonum mongolicum) in the ecotone between the Linze Oasis and the Badain Jaran Desert were selected for their hydraulic traits and functional traits measurements.
Files and variables
File: Data_origin.csv
Description: Data_origin provides raw hydraulic and functional trait data of stems and roots for three shrub species in typical ecotone of northwest China.
Variables
- Species: The tree dominant shrub species were selected for their trait measurements.
- Shrub number: For each shrub species, six healthy individuals were selected for field experiments.
- replicate: For each individual, two samples were selected from different directions of the canopy.
- P50_stem: Stem water potential at which hydraulic conductivity reduced by 50 % (MPa).
- P88_stem: Stem water potential at which hydraulic conductivity reduced by 88 % (MPa).
- Ksmax_stem: The maximum sapwood-specific hydraulic conductance for stems (kg m-1 s-1 MPa-1).
- HV_stem: Huber value (cm2 cm-2).
- TD_stem: Stem tissue density (g cm-3).
- DMC_stem: Stem dry matter content (g g-1).
- SWC_stem: Stem saturated water content (%).
- P50_root: Root water potential at which hydraulic conductivity reduced by 50 % (MPa).
- P88_root: Root water potential at which hydraulic conductivity reduced by 88 % (MPa).
- Ksmax_root: The maximum sapwood-specific hydraulic conductance for roots (kg m-1 s-1 MPa-1).
- TD_root: Root tissue density (g cm-3).
- DMC_root: Root dry matter content (g g-1).
- SWC_root: Root saturated water content (%).
- SRL_m2: Specific root length (diameter higher than 2 mm) (cm g-1).
File: Data_summary.csv
Description: Data_summary provides summary for functional and hydraulic traits used in the manuscript.
Variables
- Trait: Plant traits.
- WP_pd_leaf: Predawn leaf water potential (MPa).
- WP_pd_leaf_SE: Standard error of predawn leaf water potential (MPa).
- WP_md_leaf: Midday leaf water potential (MPa).
- WP_md_leaf_SE: Standard error of midday leaf water potential (MPa).
- WP_md_stem: Midday stem water potential (MPa).
- WP_md_stem_SE: Standard error of midday stem water potential (MPa).
- P50_leaf: Leaf water potential at which hydraulic conductance reduced by 50 % (MPa).
- P50_stem: Stem water potential at which hydraulic conductivity reduced by 50 % (MPa).
- P50_root: Root water potential at which hydraulic conductivity reduced by 50 % (MPa).
- P88_leaf: Leaf water potential at which hydraulic conductance reduced by 88 % (MPa).
- P88_stem: Stem water potential at which hydraulic conductivity reduced by 88 % (MPa).
- P88_root: Root water potential at which hydraulic conductivity reduced by 88 % (MPa).
- HSM50_leaf: Leaf hydraulic safety margin determined by P50 values (MPa).
- HSM50_stem: Stem hydraulic safety margin determined by P50 values (MPa).
- HSM50_root: Root hydraulic safety margin determined by P50 values (MPa).
- HSM88_leaf: Leaf hydraulic safety margin determined by P88 values (MPa).
- HSM88_stem: Stem hydraulic safety margin determined by P88 values (MPa).
- HSM88_root: Root hydraulic safety margin determined by P88 values (MPa).
- RWCT_leaf: Relative water content at turgor loss point for leaf (%).
- RWCT_leaf_SE: Standard error of relative water content at turgor loss point for leaf (%).
- BME_leaf: Bulk modulus of elasticity for leaf (MPa).
- BME_leaf_SE: Standard error of bulk modulus of elasticity for leaf (MPa).
- C_leaf: Leaf capacitance (mol m-2 MPa-1).
- C_leaf_SE: Standard error of leaf capacitance (mol m-2 MPa-1).
- WP_O_leaf: Osmotic potential at full turgor for leaf (MPa).
- WP_O_leaf_SE: Standard error of osmotic potential at full turgor for leaf (MPa).
- WP_T_leaf: Osmotic potential at turgor loss point for leaf (MPa).
- WP_T_leaf_SE: Standard error of osmotic potential at turgor loss point for leaf (MPa).
- RWCT_root: Relative water content at turgor loss point for root (%).
- RWCT_root_SE: Standard error of relative water content at turgor loss point for root (%).
- BME_root: Bulk modulus of elasticity for root (MPa).
- BME_root_SE: Standard error of bulk modulus of elasticity for root (MPa).
- C_root: Root capacitance (mol m-2 MPa-1).
- C_root_SE: Standard error of root capacitance (mol m-2 MPa-1).
- WP_O_root: Osmotic potential at full turgor for root (MPa).
- WP_O_root_SE: Standard error of osmotic potential at full turgor for root (MPa).
- WP_T_root: Osmotic potential at turgor loss point for root (MPa).
- WP_T_root_SE: Standard error of osmotic potential at turgor loss point for root (MPa).
- DMC_leaf: Leaf dry matter content (g g-1).
- DMC_stem: Stem dry matter content (g g-1).
- DMC_root: Root dry matter content (g g-1).
- SWC_leaf: Leaf saturated water content (%).
- SWC_stem: Stem saturated water content (%).
- SWC_root: Root saturated water content (%).
- TD_leaf: Leaf tissue density (g cm-3).
- TD_stem: Stem tissue density (g cm-3).
- TD_root: Root tissue density (g cm-3).
- SLA: Specific leaf area (cm2 g-1).
- SRL_L2: Specific root length (diameter lower than 2 mm) (cm g-1).
- SRL_M2: Specific root length (diameter higher than 2 mm) (cm g-1).
- HV: Huber value (cm2 cm-2).
