Data from: Spatial heterogeneity of habitat selection of large carnivores and their ungulate prey in proximity to roads
Data files
Apr 25, 2025 version files 606.72 KB
-
original_data.xlsx
595.55 KB
-
README.md
7.97 KB
-
Source_code_files_of_the_models.R
3.20 KB
Abstract
Geographic heterogeneity, encompassing both species-environment interactions and interspecific relationships, significantly influences the ecological attributes of wildlife habitat selection and population distribution. However, the impact of geographic heterogeneity on the distribution of target species within predator-prey systems, particularly in human-dominated landscapes, remains unclear. By conducting line transect surveys, utilizing a monitoring network, and applying logistic Geographically Weighted Regression (GWR) in conjunction with generalized linear models (GLM), we examined the spatial heterogeneity of habitat selection by the Amur tiger, Amur leopard, and their main ungulate prey, wild boar and roe deer, in Northeast China. Our results suggest that the factors affecting the spatial distribution of predators are more complex than those for prey. More significantly, the selection coefficients of roe deer and wild boar for certain habitat factors serve as crucial explanatory variables in the Amur tiger and leopard models. Our findings emphasize the importance of spatial non-stationarity in predator-prey habitat selections, and the heterogeneous selection by prey may drive dispersals of large felids across complex road landscapes. This study offers new insights into how to help apex predators cross road barriers by effectively managing prey habitat selection in a landscape dominated by roads, providing valuable guidance for future habitat conservation policies.
[Access this dataset on Dryad] https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.47d7wm3p6
1. Dataset Overview
This dataset supports the publication titled "Spatial heterogeneity of habitat selection of large carnivores and their ungulate prey in proximity to roads". The data were collected and processed to analyze how habitat variables and anthropogenic disturbances affect habitat selection patterns. The dataset includes spatial environmental variables at a 200-meter resolution, field survey results, and outputs from geographically weighted regression models.
2. File Inventory
-
original data. xlsx: Primary dataset with spatial environmental predictors.
-
Source code files of the models. R: The dataset includes R scripts used to perform data preprocessing, model fitting, and spatial prediction using GLM methods.
All scripts are written in R (tested in R 4.3.2) and are commented to support reproducibility. Users are encouraged to modify file paths and data names as needed. These scripts are provided under the CC0 1.0 Universal (CC0 1.0) Public Domain Dedication.
-
README.md: This README file.
3. Description of Variable
The following table summarizes the environmental variables used in the dataset, their definitions, units, and sources.
| Habitat Factor | Habitat Variable | Description | Source | Units |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Topographic factor | Elevation | Elevation values for each 200m grid cell | SRTM 1 Arc-Second Global | m |
| Aspect | Slope aspect derived from the digital elevation model | Ditto | ° | |
| Slope | Slope degree derived from the digital elevation model | Ditto | ° | |
| Forest type | BDF | Distance to nearest closed (>40%) broadleaved deciduous forest patch | GlobCover 2009, ESA | m |
| NDEF | Distance to nearest open (15–40%) needle-leaved forest patch | Ditto | m | |
| MBNF | Distance to nearest mixed broadleaved and needle-leaved forest patch | Ditto | m | |
| MFSG | Distance to nearest mosaic forest/shrubland-grassland patch | Ditto | m | |
| MGFS | Distance to nearest mosaic grassland-forest/shrubland patch | Ditto | m | |
| SV | Distance to nearest sparse (<15%) vegetation patch | Ditto | m | |
| Human disturbance | Settlements | Distance to nearest temporary settlements | National Basic Geographic Database (1:250,000), 2015 | m |
| Farmland | Distance to nearest farmland area | Ditto | m | |
| Ginseng | Distance to nearest ginseng plantation | Ditto | m | |
| Mining | Distance to nearest mining area | Ditto | m | |
| Pasture | Distance to nearest pasture | Ditto | m | |
| Village | Distance to nearest village | Ditto | m | |
| P_Road | Distance to nearest primary road | Ditto | m | |
| S_Road | Distance to nearest secondary road | Ditto | m | |
| T_Road | Distance to nearest tertiary road | Ditto | m | |
| Weather factor | Snow | Average snow depth per 200m grid (measured during Jan–Feb 2018) | Field surveys, 2018 | cm |
| Other | Food | Number of new shrub branches within the 200m grid (proxy for food availability) | Field surveys, 2018 | – |
| River | Distance to nearest river or tributary | National Basic Geographic Database (1:250,000), 2015 | m |
4. Software Description: sgwrwin.exe
The sgwrwin.exe software used in the analysis is not distributed as part of this Dryad submission due to license constraints. For access and usage, please refer to https://gwrtools.github.io/.
5. Licensing and Data Source Compliance
All data included in this submission complies with the CC0 public domain waiver required by Dryad. Specifically:
- The SRTM elevation dataset is distributed under open access with no restrictions, and is publicly available via the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS): https://doi.org/10.5066/F7PR7TFT
- The GlobCover 2009 land cover dataset is publicly distributed by the European Space Agency (ESA), and made available for free public access. While not formally CC0, ESA does not restrict reuse or redistribution, thus compliant with Dryad’s data sharing principles.
- All field-collected data and derived variables are original and generated by the authors.
6. Contact
For questions about the dataset, please contact:
Name:**Xuankai Liang
Affiliation:**Feline Research Center of National Forestry and Grassland Administration, College of Wildlife and Protected Area, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin, China
Email:liangxk2023@163.com
