Data from: Densities of the endangered Large blue butterfly Phengaris arion vary by 100-fold in restored conservation grasslands, providing a tool to prioritise future introductions
Data files
Mar 03, 2025 version files 14.04 KB
-
README.md
1.78 KB
-
Thomas_et_al_japplecol_data.xlsx
12.25 KB
Abstract
A long-term study was made of the carrying capacities (K) of UK grasslands restored to support the endangered butterfly Phengaris arion. This iconic species is the focus of major restoration programmes and provides a blueprint for the conservation of other threatened insects. P. arion larvae are phytophagous during their early instars before switching to become obligate social parasites of Myrmica ant colonies for their main growth. A mechanistic model, incorporating life-table measurements of natality and mortalities, was used to predict the value of K on 19 restorations. Predictions were compared with actual butterfly densities measured for up to 33 consecutive generations per site over 43 years. The model suggested that individual sites vary by up to a hundred-fold in the density of butterflies each site would support. Observed densities closely correlated with model predictions, with the most productive site supporting 129-times more butterflies per square metre than the least productive one. Of seven life-table parameters modelled, the three that explained observed butterfly densities best describe the distribution and fitness of its primary host-ant species, Myrmica sabuleti. Population densities correlated most closely with the density of host-ant nests. Annual fluctuations in P. arion numbers attributable to the weather were one to two orders of magnitude lower than the differences between site carrying capacity densities. Even extreme events, such as drought, caused perturbations one order of magnitude smaller than inter-site carrying capacity variations.
Synthesis and application. Observed population dynamics of P. arion conform with theories of a definable ceiling for insect numbers, controlled by density-dependence and limited by a larval resource that is typically more specialised, and rarer, within sites than was once perceived. At a practical level, the model provides a useful tool for determining which future sites should be prioritised for the persistence of this endangered species and for new restorations. More generally, the results support two concepts: (i) once suitable management has been implemented, effects of intrinsic site characteristics on numbers greatly exceed inter-annual fluctuations; and (ii) understanding how the quality of larval habitat varies between sites is paramount when restoring the size and resilience of populations of declining invertebrates.
https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.4j0zpc8pc
Description of the data and file structure
The Excel file tabulates data collected in the field on restoration sites for Phengaris arion, a social parasite as a larva of the ant Myrmica sabuleti. The rows refer to each of 19 sites. The columns data consist of 3 columns describing the fitness of the host ant Myrmica sabuleti on each site; site area and ant equivalents calculated as described in methods section of the article; and estimated and observed carrying capacity densities (K) for each site together with the standard errors and ln values of these.
Files and variables
File: Thomas_et_al_japplecol_data.xlsx
Description: field data used to calculate estimated and mean observed carrying capacities of 19 UK restoration sites for the butterfly* Phengaris arion*
Variables
- SITE: Refers to the study site. The sites are represented by:
- D: Dartmoor
- C: Cotswolds
- S: Somerset
- % host ant presence
- ant 'nests’ m-2: The density of ant nests per square meter observed at each site.
- mean host ant weight in milligrams
- density of host ant nests per square metre of habitat
- site area (square metres)
- ant equivalent of each site
- estimated carrying capacity density (K) for Phengaris arion
- observed carrying capacity density (K) for Phengaris arion
- ln values and Standard Errors of K
Access information
Other publicly accessible locations of the data:
- none
Data was derived from the following sources:
- the authors' fieldwork
