Skip to main content
Dryad

How animals discriminate between stimulus magnitudes: a meta-analysis

Worsley, Megan Z.1; Schroeder, Julia1; Dixit, Tanmay23

Research facility: Jesus College
Published May 05, 2025 on Dryad. https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.4qrfj6qng

Data files

May 05, 2025 version files 20.63 MB

Click names to download individual files

Abstract

To maximize their fitness, animals must often discriminate between stimuli differing in magnitude (such as size, intensity, or number). Weber’s Law of proportional processing states that stimuli are compared based on the proportional difference in magnitude, rather than the absolute difference. Weber’s Law implies that when stimulus magnitudes are higher, it becomes harder to discriminate small differences between stimuli, leading to more discrimination errors. More generally, we can refer to a correlation between stimulus magnitude and discrimination error frequency as a magnitude effect, with Weber’s law being a special case of the magnitude effect. If more discrimination errors are made when stimulus magnitudes are higher, this could affect how signals evolve. However, the strength and prevalence of the magnitude effect across species has never previously been tested. Here, we conducted a meta-analysis to quantify the strength of the magnitude effect across studies, finding that, on average, perception followed Weber’s Law. However, the strength of the magnitude effect varied widely, and this variation was not explained by any biological or methodological differences between studies that we examined. Our findings suggest that the magnitude effect is commonplace, and that this sensory bias is therefore likely to affect signal evolution across a diverse range of biological systems. Better discrimination at lower magnitudes might result in signalers evolving lower magnitude signals when being discriminated is beneficial, and higher magnitude signals when being discriminated is costly.