Data from: Landscape and local factors influence solitary bee nesting, but reported effects show little consistency across studies
Data files
Mar 09, 2026 version files 165 KB
-
README.md
10.98 KB
-
SLR_nesting_ecology_of_AGN_solitary_bees.csv
85.57 KB
-
SLR_nesting_ecology_of_BGN_solitary_bees.csv
68.46 KB
Apr 02, 2026 version files 165.01 KB
-
README.md
10.98 KB
-
SLR_nesting_ecology_of_AGN_solitary_beesV2.csv
85.57 KB
-
SLR_nesting_ecology_of_BGN_solitary_bees.csv
68.46 KB
Abstract
Solitary bees constitute 75% of bee species but are understudied compared with social bees. Because of global pollinator declines, it is critical to develop effective conservation measures for solitary bees. Consequently, a thorough understanding of the local and landscape factors that influence nesting of above-ground nesting (AGN) and below-ground nesting (BGN) species is required. We performed a systematic review of the scientific literature with respect to solitary bee nesting behaviour. A screening of ~15,000 articles resulted in 91 articles providing meaningful data for AGN bees and 55 articles for BGN bees. For AGN bees, we extracted information on factors such as nest orientation, nest height, cavity size, and nest materials. For BGN bees, we extracted information on factors such as ground aspect and slope, bare soil, and vegetation height. The effects of floral resources, prevalence of semi-natural habitat, and wider habitat type, were recorded for both AGN and BGN bees. Considering the factors examined in the existing literature, both AGN and BGN bees displayed higher nest occupancy in sites associated with semi-natural habitat and/or high floral abundance. For AGN bees, trap nest occupancy was associated with nest site characteristics such as the construction material and cavity diameter, while for BGN bees nesting was associated with the prevalence of bare ground. Notably, however, the reported effects of most explanatory factors on solitary bee nesting behaviour were highly inconsistent across studies. Synthesis and applications: Collectively, these findings indicate that agri-environment schemes aiming to support solitary bees should integrate the provision of nesting resources with proximity to floral resources. The heterogeneity among studies highlights the need for solitary bee conservation measures to be tailored to local conditions and to the local fauna. Where possible, nest site interventions, such as the placement of trap nests and substrate properties, should be tested experimentally across biogeographic zones to clarify their effects and assess the consistency of responses under different environmental conditions.
Dataset DOI: 10.5061/dryad.612jm64kz
Description of the data and file structure
This dataset forms part of the systematic review 'Landscape and local factors influence solitary bee nesting, but reported effects show little consistency across studies'. The metadata, list of explanatory variables, effect of explanatory variables, and notes from each article included in the review are listed. Metadata for each article is also included, and whether an article is included in the quantitative section of the review. This dataset is split into two separate CSV files: Below-ground-nesting (BGN) (SLR_nesting_ecology_of_BGN_solitary_bees.csv) and Above-ground-nesting (AGN) (SLR_nesting_ecology_of_AGN_solitary_beesV2.csv) databases. Each CSV file contains the metadata, list of explanatory variables, effect of explanatory variables, and notes from each article included in the review for each group of bee (BGN or AGN bees). The dataset is split into two separate files, as this is how the results were analysed for the systematic literature review
Files and variables
Files: SLR_nesting_ecology_of_AGN_solitary_beesV2.csv and SLR_nesting_ecology_of_BGN_solitary_bees.csv
Description:
| Variable | Description |
|---|---|
| ID | A unique number for each article included in the review |
| title | Title of the article |
| year | Year of publication of the article |
| authors | Authors of the article |
| url | A url to the article |
| Full review inclusion | Whether the article was included in the full review of the systematic review |
| Included in quantitative synthesis | Whether the article was included in the quantitative section of the systematic review |
| Reason for non-inclusion | Reason an article was not included in the quantitative section |
| Country | Country the study took place in |
| Region | Region within a county (if available) that the study took place in |
| Geographical region | Continent that the study took place in |
| Target species | If an article had a target species it was specifically investigated the species is listed here. |
| Species recorded | Full list of species recorded by an article |
| Explanatory variable and effect of explanatory variable (Column N to AW) | Explanatory variables that have been explored by an article are marked with an "x". The effect of the explanatory variable on the response variable is indicated in the adjoining column as either "P" for positive", "NE" for no significant effect, "N" for a negative significant effect, "E" for a significant effect |
| Response Variable(s) | The response variables use by the article |
| No. of variables investigated | The number of explanatory variables investigated |
| Survey methodology | Survey methodology of the article |
| Equipment used | For BGN bee studies, if the researchers used direct observation, pan traps, or emergence traps to conduct their study |
| Soil type(s) (BGN) | For BGN bee studies, the types of soil reported. |
| Nest material (AGN) | For AGN bee studies, the material used to construct the trap nest. |
| Tube diameter (AGN) | For AGN bee studies, the diameter of nest cavities in trap nests |
| Tube length (AGN) | For AGN bee studies, the length of nest cavities used in trap nest |
| Variables with significant positive impact | List of variables that had a significant positive effect |
| Variables with significant negative impact | List of variables that had a significant negative effect |
| Notes | Notes relating to an article. |
Changes after Mar 9, 2026: Minor typographical error was noted on line 65 and corrected. The change relates to the file: SLR_nesting_ecology_of_AGN_solitary_beesV2.csv
