Skip to main content
Dryad

Data from: Assessment of pollination ecology of two understudied native mustards and the potential for interference from invasive garlic mustard

Data files

Apr 08, 2026 version files 18.53 KB

Click names to download individual files

Abstract

Comparing pollinator visitation rates and identity between two native mustards (Cardamine concatenata and Cardamine diphylla) and one invasive mustard (Alliaria petiolata). These native mustards are of interest for two reasons. First, they host rare, specialist insects (Pieris virginiensis and Phyllotreta bipustulata). Second, because C. concatenata and C. diphylla have a short phenological window for seasonal development and reproduction, they are at increased risk for mutualism disruption via global change pressures, such as potential pollination disruption from A. petiolata. In this study, we aimed to establish the rate of pollinator visitation as well as pollinator identity for each mustard using sites at the Holden Arboretum in Kirtland, Ohio, where these mustards co-occur. We established randomized 1m2 quadrats in which we counted the number of open flowers of each mustard species. We then recorded the number of visits and visually grouped pollinators into morphotype groupings. We also established collection quadrats in the same manner and captured all pollinators that entered the quadrat over the sampling period. These specimens were preserved and identified to the lowest taxonomic level possible in the lab. We recorded fourteen unique pollinator taxa at our study sites. We established that C. concatenata flowering phenology does not overlap with A. petiolata flowering and therefore is not at high risk of experiencing pollination interference. C. diphylla flowering, however, overlapped with A. petiolata flowering. C. diphylla and A. petiolata shared seven of the fourteen taxa as pollinators, four of which visited these species non-discriminately (i.e., the rate of visitation for these taxa was not significantly different between A. petiolata and C. diphylla). Because pollinators are shared and visitation rates are similar, C. diphylla could potentially be experiencing decreased reproductive success where it co-occurs with A. petiolata