Data from: Feeding strategies of the Pleistocene insular dwarf elephants Palaeoloxodon falconeri and Palaeoloxodon mnaidriensis from Sicily (Italy)
Data files
Sep 23, 2025 version files 13.60 KB
-
mesowear.csv
3.29 KB
-
microwear.csv
4.43 KB
-
README.md
5.88 KB
Abstract
The fossil record of the Mediterranean islands attests several cases of insular dwarfism. The extinct large-sized straight-tusked elephant Palaeoloxodon antiquus underwent this process at least twice during the Pleistocene, resulting in the evolution of Palaeoloxodon falconeri (early Middle Pleistocene) and Palaeoloxodon mnaidriensis (late Middle Pleistocene/Late Pleistocene) in Sicily, a rare case of two insular taxa evolving from the same ancestral species independently on the same island and subsequently. We investigate diet-related dental wear patterns of P. falconeri and P. mnaidriensis from Sicily to test hypotheses on their niche occupation in more spatially restricted (P. falconeri) versus a more widely distributed, mainland-like (P. mnaidriensis) insular contexts. Although P. falconeri did not compete with other herbivorous mammals and could have exploited the most nutritious and palatable resources as a browser, dental meso- and microwear patterns suggest a high degree of dietary abrasion. P. mnaidriensis, which coexisted with other large herbivores and carnivores, also displays dental meso- and microwear patterns indicative of a high intake of abrasive items. A scenario of insular woodiness (i.e., increased woodiness in insular plants), combined with intense exploitation of the limited vegetation due to the absence of predatory pressure, may explain the abrasive dental wear patterns of P. falconeri. The high degree of abrasion observed in P. mnaidriensis patterns may reflect an adaptation to a grazing diet associated with the expansion of open grasslands during the Late Pleistocene. Our results show that the dwarf elephants of Sicily developed similar dietary adaptations, albeit in response to different ecological conditions.
Dataset DOI: 10.5061/dryad.6djh9w1f7
Description of the data and file structure
Data from: Feeding strategies of the Pleistocene insular dwarf elephants Palaeoloxodon falconeri and Palaeoloxodon mnaidriensis from Sicily (Italy)
Dataset DOI: 10.5061/dryad.6djh9w1f7
Description of the data and file structure:
Dental mesowear and microwear raw data.
Dental mesowear data of Palaeoloxodon mnaidriensis teeth was collected using a digital goniometer with an accuracy of 0.1° (as in Saarinen et al., 2015), model DAF-001 from CMT Utensili. The goniometer was modified to fit inside the plates by attaching two thin metal extensions to the arms, so that they shared the goniometer’s rotational fulcrum and did not need to be repositioned for each measurement.
Dental mesowear data of Palaeoloxodon falconeri were scanned with an Olympus LEXT OLS4000 laser scanning confocal microscope, coupling color imaging and laser confocal optical systems. Acquisition was carried out on a plate in the central portion at 2.5x magnification, using both laser and color optics. For slightly larger teeth, several images were acquired with a 25% overlapping region and then combined together if necessary. Using the proprietary software Lext (Olympus), the 3D laser surface reconstructions were processed using a noise reduction filter to remove spikes, that may occur when measuring rough or highly reflective surfaces and causing the detector pixels saturations or extremely low signal detection, respectively. On the 3D surfaces, virtual cross-sections of the plates were analysed and angles were directly measured on the extracted profiles. Scan results were exported in CSV format to allow their use in spreadsheets.
For the dental microwear analysis, we followed the Solounias & Semprebon (2002) protocol. The occlusal surfaces of the teeth were cleaned with acetone and then with alcohol (95%). The surfaces were moulded with high-resolution silicone (vinyl polysiloxane) and casts were made with clear epoxy resin. The casts were examined under incident light using a Nikon Eclipse ME600 stereomicroscope at 35× mounted with a Canon EOS 500D digital camera. For each sample, images were taken every 5 degrees of progressive focus (from the top to the base of the selected enamel band) and merged using the Helicon Focus software. For each sample, we photographed the central lamellae and selected enamel bands with preserved diet-related microwear patterns, discarding damaged teeth or specimens with taphonomic alterations.
Microwear data were collected using the MicroWeaR software (Strani et al., 2018). We quantified all categories of microwear features in a standard square area of 0.16 mm2 and features were automatically divided into scratches and pits based on length/width ratio (≤4 for pit and >4 for scratch). For each of these two categories, different subcategories based on the diameter (for pits) and width (for scratches) were also automatically recorded: small and large pits (by default diameter ≤8 and >8 μm, respectively), and fine and coarse scratches (by default the width ≤3 and >3 μm, respectively). We also carried out the microwear analysis in two different 0.16 mm2 study areas for each specimen and then we calculated the average to reduce count errors.
SAARINEN, J., KARME, A., CERLING, T., UNO, K., SÄILÄ, L., KASIKI, S., NGENE, S., OBARI, T., MBUA, E., MANTHI, F. K. and FORTELIUS, M. 2015. A new tooth wear–based dietary analysis method for Proboscidea (Mammalia). Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 35, e918546.
SOLOUNIAS, N., and SEMPREBON, G. M. 2002. Advances in the Reconstruction of Ungulate Ecomorphology with Application to Early Fossil Equids. American Museum Novitates, 3366 (3366), 1–49.
STRANI, F., PROFICO, A., MANZI, G., PUSHKINA, D., RAIA, P., SARDELLA, R. and DEMIGUEL, D. 2018. MicroWeaR: A new R package for dental microwear analysis. Ecology and evolution, 8, 7022–7030.
Files and variables
File: mesowear.csv
Description:
Variables
- Tool: Tool used to measure Mesowear Angles
- Specimen: Specimen's number
- Region: Region of provenance
- Locality: Locality of provenance
- Tooth: Tooth position (uppercase indicate upper tooth, lowercase lower tooth)
- Side: Left (sx) or right (dx)
- L1.1: First Lamellae Angle Measurement #1
- L1.2: First Lamellae Angle Measurement #2
- L1.3: First Lamellae Angle Measurement #3
- Average L1 : Average angle of the First Lamellae
- L2.1: Second Lamellae Angle Measurement #1
- L2.2: Second Lamellae Angle Measurement #2
- L2.3: Second Lamellae Angle Measurement #3
- Average L2 : Average angle of the Second Lamellae
- L3.1: Third Lamellae Angle Measurement #1
- L3.2: Third Lamellae Angle Measurement #2
- L3.3: Third Lamellae Angle Measurement #3
- Average L3 : Average angle of the Third Lamellae
- MWA: Average Mesowear Angle (Mean of Average L1, L2 and L3)
File: microwear.csv
Description:
Variables
- Specimen: Specimen's number
- Region: Region of provenance
- Locality: Locality of provenance
- Tooth: Tooth position (uppercase indicate upper tooth, lowercase lower tooth)
- Side: Left (sx) or right (dx)
- Taxon: Species
- NSP: Number of small pits
- NLP: Number of large pits
- NP: Number of pits (large + small)
- NFS: Number of fine scratches
- NCS: Number of coarse scratches
- NS: Number of scratches (fine + coarse)
n/a: data not available due to tafonomic defects (in case of locality due to missing information)
Access information
Other publicly accessible locations of the data: