Skip to main content
Dryad

Data from: Infrared camouflage in leaf-sitting frogs: A cautionary tale on adaptive convergence

Data files

Feb 12, 2025 version files 2.57 MB

Abstract

Many green animals that appear cryptic against green leaves also match leaf reflectance in the near-infrared (NIR). It is unlikely that this NIR background matching contributes to visual camouflage because animals do not see NIR light. Two alternative explanations have been proposed –  infrared camouflage (i.e. matching the temperature of the background) and thermoregulation – but neither hypothesis has been experimentally tested. To test these hypotheses, we developed coatings that manipulate NIR reflectance independently from visible reflectance. We produced agar frog models that mimic the reflectivity of different species of leaf-sitting frogs, which are visibly green but differ greatly in NIR reflectance. We compared heating rates and temperature (surface and core) of high and low NIR reflectance frog models in the laboratory using a solar simulator, and in tropical rainforest – the natural habitat of leaf-sitting frogs. In the laboratory, agar frog models with low NIR reflectance heated up more quickly and reached higher temperatures than those with high NIR reflectance. However, in the field, there was no significant difference between high and low NIR treatments in the similarity of surface temperature to the adjacent leaves or in core temperature, thus failing to support the infrared camouflage and thermoregulation hypotheses, respectively. The lack of difference between treatments is likely due to the limited exposure of frogs to direct solar radiation in their natural habitats. We propose a non-adaptive explanation for NIR background matching based on specific mechanisms underlying green coloration and translucence in frogs and caution against assuming adaptive convergence.