Data from: Hot spots or hot moments? Contextualizing the spatio-temporal scale of research on animal inputs
Data files
Mar 17, 2026 version files 696.62 KB
-
HSHM_Apendix1.xlsx
693.29 KB
-
README.md
3.33 KB
Abstract
Mammals play important roles in redistributing elements across ecosystems, concentrating biogeochemical inputs across both space and time. However, research on zoogeochemical inputs is often constrained by logistical considerations, potentially limiting our knowledge of mammals’ impacts on biogeochemical patterns and processes. Here, we present a bibliometric analysis that synthesizes both the spatiotemporal scope of research and the range of methodological approaches used to study zoogeochemical inputs from mammals. Our assessment focuses on the major material pathways—fecal matter, urine, carcasses, and other body wastes—that are directly deposited by mammals. Our goal was to identify the ecological variables, ecosystem processes, and the spatial and temporal scales investigated by these studies, characterize geographic and taxonomic biases, and draw attention to opportunities for improved conceptual continuity. We found that while many studies effectively characterized the biogeochemical composition of mammalian inputs themselves, there is little methodological standardization across measurements that characterize the fates and functional impacts of these inputs within ecosystems. The diversity of approaches reflects the wide range of research questions in the field; however, paired with a lack of standardized measurement protocols and limited data sharing, this diversity prevents cross-study empirical and conceptual synthesis. Notably, almost all studies were limited in duration (< 3 years) and did not follow ecosystem processes long enough to detect when (or if) the input’s effects tapered off —highlighting a key opportunity for future research. Geographically, North American and European sites were relatively well represented, while deserts, boreal and tropical forests, and tropical systems were underrepresented relative to their global area. Addressing geographic biases, standardizing measurement protocols, and extending the duration of field studies to capture the full impacts of zoogeochemical inputs will enhance the ability to reconcile empirical and theoretical approaches and develop a more robust understanding of the spatiotemporal scale of mammalian control over ecosystem processes.
Dataset DOI: 10.5061/dryad.7sqv9s56x
Description of the data and file structure
This dataset contains the compiled literature database used for the meta-analysis in the paper “Hot spots or hot moments? Contextualizing the spatio-temporal scale of research on zoogeochemical inputs.” It brings together all studies included in the analysis and standardizes their metadata, study design characteristics, input types, and measured environmental response variables.
The file is organized to allow users to (1) identify all included papers, (2) understand their study context and design, and (3) interpret the reported zoogeochemical inputs and ecosystem responses.
All NA's mean that the variable did not apply to that specific study. All GPS coordinates reflect the site of the experiment conducted (where relevant and reported) or an approximation of the study site, given details from the text. No GPS coordinate is related to the presence of a specific animal.
File Structure
File: HSHM_Apendix1.xlsx
Tab 1 — Study Database
Each row corresponds to a unique study (or study component, where papers reported multiple distinct experiments or response measurements). Columns include:
- Bibliographic information for each paper
- Study system metadata (ecosystem type, taxa, biome, etc.)
- Type of zoogeochemical input measured (e.g., excretion, carcasses, bioturbation, transport)
- Study design attributes (experimental vs observational, field vs lab, etc.)
- Spatial and temporal scale descriptors
- Environmental response variable and input characteristics measured
Modeling studies
The variables assessed in modeling studies are located in columns CB–DW. As within the text, these variables are not distinguished between input characteristics or environmental response variables, as they are all estimates.
Empirical studies
Input characteristics and environmental response variables for empirical studies are located in columns DX – PR
Animal input characteristics are grouped by input type and color-coded for ease of navigation:
- Dung characteristics: columns DX–FW (brown)
- Carcass characteristics: columns FX–GV (pink)
- Urine characteristics: columns GW–HO (yellow)
- Excreta/egesta characteristics were not consistently distinguished among studies. In practice, measured excreta/egesta variables overwhelmingly represented fecal material; therefore, these measurements are included within the fecal (dung) columns (DX–FY).
- Other input characteristics: columns HP–HS (orange)
Environmental response variables begin in column IA and are grouped by environmental compartment:
- Soil responses: columns HT –KV (dark brown)
- Microbial responses: columns KW=LC (magenta)
- Plant responses: columns LD–NI (green)
- Water response variables: columns NJ–PC (light blue)
- Other environmental variables: columns PD–Pw (purple)
Tab 2 — Column Dictionary
This tab provides a complete data dictionary for Tab 1. For each column, it includes:
- Column name
- Definition and description
