Data and code from: Nest building as a missing piece in biparental care
Data files
May 21, 2026 version files 5.21 MB
-
data_extraction_analysis.R
14.19 KB
-
pair_treatment.csv
861 B
-
pair1.csv
357.32 KB
-
pair10.csv
108.74 KB
-
pair11.csv
293.14 KB
-
pair12.csv
200.89 KB
-
pair13.csv
134.56 KB
-
pair14.csv
487.29 KB
-
pair15.csv
300.40 KB
-
pair16.csv
261.43 KB
-
pair17.csv
337.90 KB
-
pair18.csv
307.82 KB
-
pair19.csv
406.62 KB
-
pair2.csv
224.90 KB
-
pair20.csv
110.72 KB
-
pair3.csv
193.41 KB
-
pair4.csv
326.42 KB
-
pair5.csv
518.10 KB
-
pair6.csv
195.34 KB
-
pair7.csv
57.57 KB
-
pair8.csv
213.61 KB
-
pair9.csv
153.36 KB
-
README.md
1.45 KB
-
trial_length.csv
171 B
Abstract
Many birds practice biparental care, providing useful systems to study its evolution. Although nest building has largely been ignored as biparental behaviour, as nest building has to happen before incubation and provisioning, it could enable parents to start evaluating their mate. While there are ample data on biparental incubation and provisioning in model species like zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata), nest-building data largely concerns material collection and preference in males. Here we collected data on building by both female and male zebra finches to test whether building behaviour depends on the behaviour of their mate or on the material they used to build their nest. Males handled nest material more frequently when their female was in the nest, while females handled nest material longer when their male was away from the nest. But neither females nor males altered their building behaviour in response to changes in their partner handling nest material. Males that built with stiff material handled the material more frequently than those that built with flexible material, while females manipulated stiff and flexible materials similarly. An important next step is to determine whether these building interactions affect later stages of parental care in the wild or in other species.
This is a README file for data and R code associated with 'Nest building as a missing piece in biparental care'.
'data_extraction_analysis.R' contains R code to extract necessary information and data from CSV files and run the statistical analysis described in the main text.
'pair_treatment.csv' describes an experimental treatment to which each pair was assigned.
'trial_length.csv' contains the duration which each pair was filmed in seconds.
'pairX.csv' contains behavioural data of zebra finch pair X. As we collected data from 20 pairs, X ranges from 1 to 20 (i.e., there are 20 CSV files that contain behavioural data). These files contain five columns, including: Time; Length; Sex; Behaviour; and Status. Time is the elapsed time in seconds since the beginning of the trial when the subject bird performed one of the scored behavioural categories. Length is the duration of the scored section of the footage in seconds. Note: Time can exceed Length as video footage was split into multiple sections for data storage purposes. Sex is the sex of the subject bird, while Behaviour is the category of the performed behaviour by the subject bird. Status indicates whether the entry is when the behaviour was performed (POINT), or the subject started (START) or stopped (STOP) the behaviour when scoring the behavioural categories, of which we measured the duration.
