The bioregionalization of wetland vegetation in Southern Africa by determining the distribution range of metacommunities by means of maximum entropy modelling
Data files
Oct 20, 2026 version files 278.94 KB
-
README.md
1.93 KB
-
WETLAND_DATA_DYRAD.csv
277.01 KB
Abstract
Wetlands are critical ecosystems that provide many ecosystem services but that also consist of high biodiversity, mostly because of the steep environmental gradients within them and large differences between them. Conservation planning of wetland vegetation is problematized by the dynamic nature of wetland vegetation across a region, and therefore a bioregional classification of wetland vegetation is needed. In this paper, we develop a method for devising a bioregional classification of wetland vegetation by taking three steps. Firstly, a hierarchical clustering of co-occurring plant communities was made whereby ‘metacommunities’ were determined. Secondly, the distribution ranges of these metacommunities were determined by species distribution modelling using maximum entropy whereby species are replaced by vegetation types. Then lastly, an overlay is made between all off these distribution models and this leads to a bioregional classification map. The initial step leads to 15 metacommunities and the overlay creates 22 wetland bioregions. Many of the mapping units on this bioregional map correspond with earlier bioregional classifications in the region, which validates the usefulness of the resulting classification. Wetland bioregions differ from terrestrial bioregions and this highlights that wetlands respond differently to climate than the surrounding terrestrial vegetation.
Dataset DOI: https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.98sf7m0x8
Journal: Ecology and Evolution (manuscript ECE-2026-05-01269)
Authors: Yoliswa Mkhize and Erwin Sieben, Council for Scientific and
Industrial Research (CSIR)
SUMMARY
This dataset contains the locations and wetland types of the vegetation plots (relevés) used in the study. The plots come from national wetland vegetation surveys in South Africa (Sieben et al., 2014) and Lesotho (Sieben & Chatanga,2019). The environmental layers, model outputs and the National Wetland Map used in the analysis are not included (see "Data not included").
FILES
WETLAND_DATA_DYRAD.csv (UTF-8 encoded, comma-separated, one row per plot, 5582 rows)
COLUMNS
- FID_Sieben: Row identifier, integer starting at 0
- Releve_num: Unique relevé (plot) number, integer
- Wet_type: Wetland type of the plot, text. Values: [Valleyhead seepage, Spring, Slope seepage, Floodplain, Valley bottom, Valleyhead seepage, Depression, Floodplain pan]
- Lat_DD: Latitude in signed decimal degrees (negative = south), WGS84
- Long_DD: Longitude in signed decimal degrees (positive = east), WGS84
MISSING DATA
There are no missing values in this file.
DATA NOT INCLUDED
The environmental predictors (SAEON, SAWS, Council for Geoscience and ArcGIS-derived layers) and the National Wetland Map (Van Deventer et al., 2020) were obtained from their original providers and are not redistributed here.
HOW TO OPEN
Any spreadsheet program or text editor. In R: read.csv("WETLAND_DATA_DYRAD.csv").
The coordinates can be plotted in QGIS or R.
SHARING
Public domain, CC0 1.0.
REFERENCES
Sieben, E.J.J. et al. (2014)
Sieben, E.J.J. & Chatanga, P. (2019)
