Recolonizing carnivores: Is cougar predation behaviorally mediated by bears? Cougar Killsite Data
Data files
Mar 10, 2022 version files 121.47 KB
Mar 12, 2026 version files 125.98 KB
-
CougarKiSte_Data_2021.csv
123.24 KB
-
README.md
2.74 KB
Abstract
Conservation and management efforts have resulted in population increases and range expansions for some apex predators, potentially changing trophic cascades and predatory behavior. Changes in sympatric carnivore and dominant scavenger populations provide opportunities to assess how carnivores affect one another. Cougars (Puma concolor) were the apex predator in the Great Basin of Nevada, USA, for over 80 years. Black bears (Ursus americanus) have recently recolonized the Great Basin and are known to heavily scavenge on cougar kills; however, competitive interactions between the two species in the Great Basin have yet to be examined. We investigated kill sites of 31 cougars between 2009 and 2017 across a range of bear densities to evaluate the impacts of sympatric, recolonizing bears on cougar foraging behavior. We modeled the variation in feeding bout duration (number of nights spent feeding on a prey item) and the proportion of primary prey, mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus), in cougar diets using mixed-effects models. We found that feeding bout duration was driven primarily by the size of the prey item being consumed, local bear density, and the presence of dependent kittens. The proportion of mule deer in cougar diet across all study areas declined over time, was lower for male cougars, increased with the presence of dependent kittens, and increased with higher bear densities. In sites with feral horses (Equus ferus), a novel large prey, cougar consumption of feral horses increased over time. Our results suggest that higher bear densities over time may reduce cougar feeding bout durations and may influence the prey selection trade-off for cougars when alternative, but more dangerous, large prey are available. Shifts in foraging behavior in multi-carnivore systems can have cascading effects on prey items. This study highlights the importance of measuring the impacts of sympatric apex predators and dominant scavengers on a shared resource base and, thus, provides a foundation for monitoring dynamic multi-predator/scavenger systems.
https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.9ghx3ffgt
Description of the data and file structure
Raw data of kill sites for cougars.
Please contact Julie Young at julie.young@usu.edu or julie.k.young@usda.gov, or Kristin Engebretsen at kristin.engebretsen@gmail.com for all information about the data.
These data are part of a study conducted by scientists with Wildlife Conservation Society and other organizations. They have been used in the publication: https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7424
Files and variables
File: CougarKiSte_Data_2021.csv
Description: raw data
Variables
- NightsSpent: Number of nights a cougar spent at a kill
- logNights_scl: NightsSpent logged, centered, and scaled
- PredationMonth: Name of month the kill occurred
- CougarID: Individual ID of cougar
- DependentKittens: Binary indicating if the individual cougar had dependent young at the time of the kill. 0 is no, 1 is yes.
- Kittens.3months: Indicates if the individual cougar had young that were 3 months or older at the time of the kill
- Kittens.6months: Indicates if the individual cougar had young that were 6 months or older at the time of the kill
- CougarSex: Sex of the cougar
- DaysBetweenKillandInvest: Days elapsed between when the kill was made and the investigation.
- PreySpeciesSingle: Prey species of the kill.
- PreyAgeClass: Age class of the kill.
- PreyWeightClass: Weight class of the kill.
- HorsePresence: Binary indicating if horses are present in this field site.
- Year: Numerical, the year the data was collected
- BearDensity: Annual density estimate of black bears in the NDOW management units
- DeerDensity: Annual density estimate of deer in the NDOW management units
- DeerDensity_scl: Annual density estimate of deer in the NDOW management units, scaled and centered for analysis
- BearDensity_scl: Annual density estimate of black bears in the NDOW management units, scaled and centered for analysis
- BearScav: Binary indicating if we found evidence that indicated a bear had scavenged on the carcass
- PredationDate: The date the predation event occurred, based on cougar GPS data
- BearPres: Binary indicating if this kill occurred in an area with few to no bears (No) or an established population of black years (Yes)
- Year_fac: Factor, the year the data was collected
Access information
Other publicly accessible locations of the data:
- none
Data was derived from the following sources:
- WCS
Field Methods:
We conducted kill-site investigations at clusters of cougar GPS points which were identified using the algorithm developed by Knopff et al. (2009), as likely to contain a cougar kill. We established the criteria for a kill site to be ≥2 GPS points within 200m, including at least one location obtained overnight. We prioritized visiting all clusters with a 25% or greater probability of containing a kill and then searched as many clusters with a probability <25% as the field crew could successfully visit. For each prey item located at each kill- site location, we identified the species, as well as sex and age where possible. The age of ungulates was determined using tooth eruption and wear. We documented signs of other predators or scavengers at the carcass location.
Changes after Mar 10, 2022: File updated.
- Engebretsen, Kristin N. et al. (2021), Recolonizing carnivores: Is cougar predation behaviorally mediated by bears?, Ecology and Evolution, Journal-article, https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7424
