Data from: Ecological effects of habitat complexity vary with intertidal elevation: Implications for seawall eco-engineering
Data files
Apr 22, 2025 version files 605.76 KB
-
README.md
4.49 KB
-
Vozzo_et_al._Vertical_Zonation_Data_revised.xlsx
601.27 KB
Abstract
Coastal urbanisation is replacing natural shoreline habitats with built structures, such as seawalls. Built structures often lack complex habitat features that provide protective and cool microhabitats for biodiversity. We conducted field experiments to assess whether the addition (or eco-engineering) of complex habitat panels to seawalls influenced benthic community assemblages across the intertidal range, at panel and site scales. We expected: (i) effects of habitat complexity to vary with tidal elevation, reflecting spatial variation in the identity and magnitude of stressors from which habitat complexity provides protection; (ii) positive effects of complexity on functional groups of organisms with exposed soft tissues that make them prone to desiccation and predation, and especially on the high shore where temperature and desiccation is greatest, and (iii) increases in the upper vertical limit of key taxa inhabiting eco-engineered seawalls to match reference reefs, and exceed control seawalls, depending on the type of habitat complexity provided. Effects of habitat complexity increased with tidal emersion and varied by functional group. In the mid- and high-intertidal, across which temperatures increased, complex panels supported over two times the abundance of key taxa than flat control panels. In the low-intertidal, brown algae were more abundant on flat than complex panels, whereas mobile invertebrates with exoskeletons responded positively to complexity in the high-intertidal, and mobile soft-bodied invertebrates were only found in complex habitats of the mid-intertidal. Cool microhabitats (pools, shaded depressions) of complex habitat panels were important in supporting key taxa and functional groups at higher intertidal elevations than on flat surfaces, and that, often, matched natural rocky shores.
Synthesis and applications: Our results demonstrate that the addition of habitat complexity through eco-engineering can promote key functional groups of algae and invertebrates on seawalls, but effects vary across tidal elevation gradients and with the type of complexity provided. Consequently, to achieve desired outcomes, eco-engineering interventions must be applied with knowledge of key limiting factors to target taxa, and of spatial variation in these limiting factors across small-scale gradients such as intertidal elevation, as well as sites.
Dataset DOI: 10.5061/dryad.9p8cz8wtr
Description of the data and file structure
Biodiversity surveys of intertidal seawalls with eco-engineered habitat panels, control (unmodified seawalls) and reference rocky reefs.
Files and variables
File: Vozzo_et_al._Vertical_Zonation_Data.xlsx
Description: File containing 3 tabs of different surveys. Surveys at the Site level, Panel level, and assessing the maximum vertical extent of taxa.
"." = n/a or no data on all spreadsheets.
Variables
- Site level
- Location: location of site. Balls head = BH (RS1); Cremorne Point = CP (RS2); Milsons Point = MP (CON1, CON2 and FULL).
- Int = intervention type. reference reef = reef; control seawall = con; eco-engineered seawall = eco
- Sites: Reference Reefs (RS1 and RS2): Natural rocky shores of similar aspect to seawalls; Control Seawalls (CON1 and CON2): unmodified seawalls of similar aspect to eco-engineered seawall; Eco-engineered seawall (FULL): seawall with habitat-enhancing panels affixed to it. (2 levels reference reef RS1or control seawalls, 1 eco-engineered site).
- time: before or after installation of habitat panels
- month = month of survey. -1 = before installation of panels and 6, 12, 18, 24, or 36 months = after installation of panels.
- Intertidal height (low-, mid- or high-) = stratified height within intertial zone in which panels/seawall/rocky shore was sampled.
- Rep = quadrat rep 1-5 (before) or 1-10 sampled.
- total % cover and bare % cover included in columns H & I.
- The list cover for individual taxa are provided in columns J-FQ.
- Functional group cover is provided in columns FS-GQ.
- Richness is provided in column FR.
- Panel level:
- All surveys were conducted at Eco-engineered site 1 at Milsons Point (same eco-engineered site in Site Level Biodiversity surveys).
- Month = month surveyed after installation. 6, 12, 18, 24 or 36.
- panel_type = flat control panel or complex mangrove panel surveyed
- panel_no = individual panel ID that was sampled. Control panels were sampled repeatedly.
- height = intertidal height at which the panels were located. low- mid- or high-intertidal.
- rep = replicate panel type surveyed within each intertidal height.
- total % cover and bare % cover included in columns H & I.
- The list cover for individual taxa are provided in columns J-FQ.
- Functional group cover is provided in columns FS-GQ.
- Richness is provided in column FR.
- Vertical Extent:
- int = intervention type. reference reef = reef; control seawall = con; eco-engineered seawall = eco
- site = rockyshore 1 (rs1); rockyshore 2 (rs2); eco-engineered (full); control seawall 1 (cs1) or control seawall 2 (cs2)
- column = 1-3 on control and reference sites or 1-12 on eco-engineered site. "columns" were used to delineate areas to survey on control and refenrece sites or the individual columns of different panels on the eco-engineered site.
- panel = panel type on the eco-engineered site.
- rep = replicate column of each type surveyed. n = 3 for control and reference seawalls and for each type of column on the eco-engineered seawall.
- species = one of 9 key taxa surveyed: four macro-algae (the fine red interlacing algae Capreola implexa, the red branching algae Gracillaria secundata, the sea lettuce Ulva australis, coralline algae Corallina officinalis), two sessile invertebrates (the Sydney rock oyster, Saccostrea glomerata, the rose barnacle, Tesseropora rosea) and three mobile invertebrates (the blue mussel Mytilus sp., the oyster limpet Patelloida mimula, the false limpet, Siphonaria denticulata).
- lowest_relative0m = lowest position of taxa relative to water height 0m
- highest_relative0m = highest position of taxa relative to water height 0m
- range = height range (m) observed for each taxa calculated as difference from lowest and heighest position
- highest_micro = type of microhabitat in which taxa were observed at their highest point.
Code/software
Data were analysed using R and R Studio.
Access information
Other publicly accessible locations of the data:
- Additional information can be found in supplemental material of the online version of the published manuscript.
