Data from: Balancing risk and opportunity: Nasute termite responses to predator and competitor chemical cues
Data files
Feb 18, 2026 version files 55.22 KB
-
binaryChoice_bioassays.txt
26.40 KB
-
multipleChoice_bioassays.txt
10.43 KB
-
multipleChoiceEmpty_bioassays.txt
13.94 KB
-
README.md
4.45 KB
Feb 18, 2026 version files 55.22 KB
-
binaryChoice_bioassays.txt
26.40 KB
-
multipleChoice_bioassays.txt
10.43 KB
-
multipleChoiceEmpty_bioassays.txt
13.94 KB
-
README.md
4.45 KB
Abstract
Animals frequently rely on indirect information to make foraging decisions under uncertainty. In social insects, chemical cues from other species may convey information about both predation risk and resource availability, yet how these cues are integrated during resource selection remains poorly understood. Here, we investigate how the termite Nasutitermes corniger responds to chemical cues from predators and competitors during resource selection. Using controlled laboratory bioassays, we tested termite preferences for food resources associated with cues from a predatory ant (Pheidole sp.) and a competing termite species. Predator cues consistently reduced resource selection, indicating avoidance driven by perceived predation risk. In contrast, resources associated with competitor cues were preferentially selected, suggesting that these cues function as informative signals rather than purely competitive deterrents. Our results demonstrate that termites discriminate between heterospecific chemical cues and integrate them to balance risk and opportunity during foraging. These findings highlight the role of chemical information in shaping resource selection decisions and contribute to a broader understanding of how social insects use indirect cues to navigate complex ecological trade-offs.
This README file was generated on 2026-01-27 by Paulo Cristaldo.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
- This folder contains the data for the article: SILVA, A.N.F., LIRA FILHO, L.Q., SILVA, L.S.A., de MENODNA, T.H.C., WATANABE, S.Y.M., ARAJO, A.P.A., and P.F. Cristaldo (2026). Balancing risk and opportunity: nasute termite responses to predator and competitor chemical cues.
Ecological Entomology - Comments and requests should be addressed to Paulo Cristaldo: paulo.cristaldo@ufrpe.br. Data is free for use, but I would appreciate being told, and this dataset and the matching paper cited if appropriate.
- Date of data collection (single date, range, approximate date): 2024-2025
- Geographic location of data collection: Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil
- Information about funding sources that supported the collection of the data: CNPq, CAPES, and FACEPE
DATA FILE OVERVIEW:
- The Experiments folder contains the data used in the article. The data are separated by bioassays.
- File list:
a) binaryChoice_bioassays.txt
b) multipleChoice_bioassays.txt
c) multipleChoiceEmpty_bioassays.txt - Relationship between files, if important: None
- Additional related data collected that was not included in the current data package: None
- Are there multiple versions of the dataset? No
A. If yes, name of file(s) that was updated: NA
i. Why was the file updated? NA
ii. When was the file updated? NA
#########################################################################
DATA-SPECIFIC INFORMATION FOR: binaryChoice_bioassays.txt
- Number of variables: 10
- Number of cases/rows: 541
- Variable List:
- colonyID: label of colony used in the bioassay;
- repetition: repetition conducted for each colony;
- setUp: set-up conducted (crtlxcomp: control x competitor cues; ctrlxpred: control x predator cues; compxpred: competitor cues x predator cues)
control; comp: competitor cues; pred: preddator cues); - treat: treatment (crtl: control; comp: competitor cues; pred: predator cues) of the biossay. That is, treatment in each side of experimental arena;
- time: time point of evaluation
- termites: frequency of termite individuals in each treatment;
- workers: frequency of workers in each treatment;
- soldiers: frequency of soldiers in each treatment;
- total: total number of termites that responding the treatments;
- totalArena: total number of termites in the bioassays;
- Missing data codes: None
- Specialized formats or other abbreviations used: None
#########################################################################
DATA-SPECIFIC INFORMATION FOR: multipleChoice_bioassays.txt
- Number of variables: 9
- Number of cases/rows: 271
- Variable List:
- colonyID: label of colony used in the bioassay;
- repetition: repetition conducted for each colony;
- treat: treatment (crtl: control; comp: competitor cues; pred: predator cues) of the biossay. That is, treatment in each side of experimental arena;
- time: time point of evaluation
- termites: frequency of termite individuals in each treatment;
- workers: frequency of workers in each treatment;
- soldiers: frequency of soldiers in each treatment;
- total: total number of termites that responding the treatments;
- totalArena: total number of termites in the bioassays;
- Missing data codes: None
- Specialized formats or other abbreviations used: None
#########################################################################
DATA-SPECIFIC INFORMATION FOR: multipleChoiceEmpty_bioassays.txt
- Number of variables: 9
- Number of cases/rows: 361
- Variable List:
- colonyID: label of colony used in the bioassay;
- repetition: repetition conducted for each colony;
- treat: treatment (crtl: control; comp: competitor cues; pred: predator cues) of the biossay. That is, treatment in each side of experimental arena;
- time: time point of evaluation
- termites: frequency of termite individuals in each treatment;
- workers: frequency of workers in each treatment;
- soldiers: frequency of soldiers in each treatment;
- total: total number of termites that responding the treatments;
- totalArena: total number of termites in the bioassays;
- Missing data codes: None
- Specialized formats or other abbreviations used: None
#########################################################################
