Skip to main content
Dryad

Data from: Reconstruction of fallout deposition from U.S. atmospheric nuclear tests conducted in New Mexico and Nevada

Data files

Jul 14, 2026 version files 113.95 MB

Click names to download individual files

Abstract

This repository contains the datasets underlying the figures presented in the accompanying article on the reconstruction of radioactive fallout from U.S. atmospheric nuclear weapon tests conducted in New Mexico and Nevada between 1945 and 1962. The data were generated using the NOAA HYSPLIT atmospheric transport and dispersion model driven by the ERA5 meteorological reanalysis. The repository includes: (1) county-level iodine-131 deposition estimates for the atmospheric tests used to benchmark the model against National Cancer Institute reconstructions (Figure 2 in associated manuscript); (2) daily cumulative gridded deposition fields for the Trinity test over the first 10 days following detonation (Figure 3); (3) reconstructed Trinity deposition results using the 10 ERA5 ensemble members together with the control simulation (Figure 4); (4) the cumulative gridded deposition field resulting from all 94 non-zero-yield atmospheric nuclear tests reconstructed in this study (Figure 5); and (5) county-level iodine-131 deposition datasets for three alternative airburst particle-size distributions used in the sensitivity analysis presented in Supplementary Figure 3. The datasets are provided in machine-readable formats and include geographic coordinates or identifiers, test numbers where applicable, deposition values expressed in becquerels per square meter (Bq m -2), and associated metadata. Together, these data enable reproduction of the published figures, independent validation of the modeling results, comparison with historical fallout reconstructions, and reuse for studies of atmospheric transport, environmental contamination, radiation dose assessment, and historical nuclear testing. The repository contains no personally identifiable information or human subject data and raises no ethical or privacy concerns. All datasets were generated from publicly available historical test information, meteorological reanalysis products, and physics-based atmospheric transport simulations. Users should interpret the reconstructed deposition estimates together with the accompanying documentation and the associated publication, which describe the modeling assumptions, source terms, and uncertainty analyses underlying the datasets.