Data from: Pee-cards: a new, inexpensive, and humane technique to index collared lemming abundance
Data files
May 14, 2026 version files 85.10 KB
-
Berteaux_et_al._raw_data_Pee-cards_Ms.xlsx
83.23 KB
-
README.md
1.87 KB
Abstract
Lemmings drive tundra vertebrate food webs, yet ethical and logistical constraints still limit spatially explicit monitoring. We introduce and evaluate a low-cost “pee-card” method that indexes collared lemming (Dicrostonyx groenlandicus) abundance from urine marks, and compare it with snap-traps and incidental observations. Across four transects (20 stations each) over three summers (2019, 2023, 2025) at Alert, Nunavut, we deployed 240 pee-cards per year (3 per station; 720 total) and then placed snap-traps at the same micro-sites. Each method was run for three consecutive 24-h periods. Pee-card detections were positively associated with snap-trap captures, with models including year and transect explaining additional variation. Using traps as the reference, pee-cards showed high sensitivity (93%), moderate specificity (52%), and balanced accuracy of 72%, with very few false negatives. Patterns held with and without fresh lemming signs of activity. Accumulation curves indicated that pee-cards saturated by the second 24-h period and, after three periods, identified presence at more than twice as many stations as traps. Pee-cards may provide a scalable, non-invasive index of collared lemming presence and abundance, potentially enabling efficient, ethical monitoring at broad spatial scales.
Dataset DOI: 10.5061/dryad.d7wm37qf8
Description of the data and file structure
Files and variables
File: Berteaux_et_al._raw_data_Pee-cards_Ms.xlsx
Description: Collared lemming abundance
Variables
- Year — Study year; integer. Allowed: 2019, 2023, 2025.
- Device_Type — Device used; categorical. Allowed: Pee-card, Snap-trap.
- Line_ID — Transect ID; categorical. Allowed: A, B, C, D.
- Station_ID — Station number along the transect; integer (1–20).
- Trap_ID — Temporary micro-site within 4 m of station stake; label (a, b, c / nearest, intermediate, furthest).
- Visit1 — Device-level detection after first 24-h period; label.
- NA = No urine mark (pee-card) or no capture (snap-trap).
- U = Urine.
- E = Card covered with earth dug out by lemmings.
- Feces = Feces but not Urine.
- Lemming = Chew mark from lemming.
- Fox = Chew mark from fox.
- Lost = Card lost.
- M = Snap-trap misfire.
- YYYY-X-99 = Captured lemming identifier, with YYYY=year of capture, X=Line_ID, 99=chronological number of lemming capture for this year and this line.
- Visit2 — Device-level detection after second 24-h period; label (see Visit1).
- Visit3 — Device-level detection after third 24-h period; label (see Visit1).
- Distance — Distance of device from stake; numeric (m).
- Burrow — Burrow at micro-site; categorical. Allowed: Y (Yes), N (No).
- Activity — Fresh surface sign of activity (yes/no by decision rules); categorical. Allowed: Y (Yes), N (No).
Code/software
Excel
Access information
Other publicly accessible locations of the data:
- N/A
Data was derived from the following sources:
- N/A
We conducted a multi-year field experiment at Canadian Forces Station Alert, Nunavut (82°30′N, 62°20′W) to develop and validate a non-lethal “pee-card” method for indexing collared lemming activity and to benchmark it against snap trap captures. In each of three summers (2019, 2023, 2025), we established four 285-m transects (A–D) with 20 permanent stations at 15-m intervals (240 stations per year). At every station, three temporary micro-sites were selected within 4 m of the stake (newly chosen each year). Pee-cards (3 × 8 cm corrugated polypropylene) were left for three consecutive 24-h periods, and checked each morning; observers recorded urine marks ≥1 mm and whether the card was at a burrow and/or near fresh sign. Immediately afterward, each micro-site received a Museum Special snap trap (≈14 × 7 cm), baited with peanut butter and operated for three consecutive 24-h checks. Across years this design yielded 720 pee-cards and the same number of subsequent trap placements. All work followed approved animal-care and territorial permits.
