Data from: GDP-loaded K-Ras transiently binds to effector B-Raf RBD, mirroring the structure of the active GTP-loaded complex
Data files
Jul 30, 2026 version files 1.10 MB
-
G12D_KRas_GDP_unlabeled_RBD.zip
392.10 KB
-
RBD_unlabeled_G12D_KRas_GDP.zip
115.71 KB
-
RBD_unlabeled_WT_KRas_GDP.zip
178.92 KB
-
README.md
2.18 KB
-
WT_KRas_GDP_unlabeled_RBD.zip
407.74 KB
Jul 30, 2026 version files 1.10 MB
-
G12D_KRas_GDP_unlabeled_RBD.zip
392.10 KB
-
RBD_unlabeled_G12D_KRas_GDP.zip
115.71 KB
-
RBD_unlabeled_WT_KRas_GDP.zip
178.92 KB
-
README.md
2.18 KB
-
WT_KRas_GDP_unlabeled_RBD.zip
407.74 KB
Abstract
The Ras-Raf protein association initiates the downstream mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling cascade. This interaction depends on the Ras-nucleotide ligand, whereby Raf preferentially binds to the active guanosine triphosphate (GTP)-loaded state over the guanosine diphosphate (GDP)-loaded state of Ras. Whether GDP-bound Ras can also form specific protein-protein interactions with Raf, however, remains unclear. Here, we characterize the interaction between human K-Ras in both nucleotide states and the Ras-binding domain (RBD) of B-Raf by solution NMR. Active K-Ras•GTP forms a tight, conformationally restricted complex with RBD, causing pronounced chemical shift perturbations at the binding interface consistent with existing cryo-EM and X-ray crystallography structures. Surprisingly, we detect specific binding between “inactive” wild-type K-Ras•GDP with RBD in the millimolar affinity range, whereby the oncogenic G12D mutant of K-Ras further strengthens this interaction. NMR relaxation dispersion and chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) experiments allow the detailed structural characterization of the transient K-Ras•GDP•RBD complex, along with the determination of the interaction affinity and kinetics. The results demonstrate that the transient K-Ras•GDP•RBD bound state closely resembles the active K-Ras•GTP•RBD complex, providing a quantitative understanding at the backbone 15N-level of the nucleotide-specific K-Ras-Raf interaction. These findings underscore the prospect of the highly adaptable GDP-bound state of K-Ras for both signaling and as a drug target.
Description of the data and file structure
- 15N-CPMG and 15N-CEST data of GDP-loaded K-Ras (WT or G12D mutant) and B-Raf RBD
- Each .zip archive contains the complete set of CPMG, CEST, and HSQC/HMQC data acquired for one sample
- 15N-labeled proteins in the presence of unlabeled binding partners; the protein states are specified in the folder names
Files and variables
Sample associated with each .zip archive:
- WT_KRas_GDP_unlabeled_RBD.zip : 0.6 mM 15N-labeled WT K-Ras•GDP in the presence of 0.15 mM unlabeled WT B-Raf RBD
- G12D_KRas_GDP_unlabeled_RBD.zip : 0.33 mM 15N-labeled G12D K-Ras•GDP in the presence of 0.09 mM unlabeled WT B-Raf RBD
- RBD_unlabeled_WT_KRas_GDP.zip : 0.554 mM 15N-labeled WT B-Raf RBD in the presence of 0.554 mM unlabeled WT K-Ras•GDP
- RBD_unlabeled_G12D_KRas_GDP.zip : 0.51 mM 15N-labeled WT B-Raf RBD in the presence of 0.25 mM unlabeled G12D K-Ras•GDP
Files contained in each .zip archive:
data
- Experiment folder (CPMG, CEST, HSQC-HMQC)
- In CEST or CPMG folders: "residue name".out : 3-column tab-delimited file containing variable parameter (ncyc or offset), peak amplitude, and error
- In HSQC-HMQC folders: "sqmq.txt" : 3-column tab-delimited file containing assignment, shift, and error
experiments
- .toml configuration files associated with the respective dataset in the 'data' folder. These contain the necessary experimental details to analyze with ChemEx software
parameters
- .toml files containing 15N chemical shift differences between the two states, chemical shifts of the ground state, R1 and R2 values, and global exchange parameters with corresponding uncertainties
Code/Software
Data and experiment description files are provided in a format amenable to analysis by ChemEx software (https://github.com/gbouvignies/chemex)
Acknowledgements
We thank Dr. Alexandar L. Hansen for implementing and optimizing the NMR dynamics experiments and for helpful discussions.
All NMR experiments were performed at 298 K on a Bruker magnet with an AVANCE III console operating at 850 MHz (19.97 T) equipped with a 5 mm TCI cryoprobe. Backbone amide 15N-(STCW-)CPMG NMR relaxation dispersion and 15N-CEST experiments were performed for 15N-labeled K-Ras•GDP in the presence of unlabeled RBD and 15N-labeled RBD in the presence of unlabeled K-Ras•GDP, for both WT K-Ras and G12D mutant. Amide HSQC/HMQC experiments were measured to assist the sign determination of the chemical shift differences Δϖ during the exchange fittings. All dynamics experiments were measured with recovery delay d1 of 2 s. The constant relaxation time TCPMG for the CPMG block was set to 30 or 40 ms. The CPMG 15N-refocusing pulses were applied with a B1-field of approximately 6.1 kHz, and the CPMG pulsing frequency νCPMG was varied from 25 Hz to 2 kHz. For CEST experiments, mixing times ranged from 150 ms to 250 ms with the saturation field strength B1 set around 20 Hz.
The dynamics NMR experiments were processed with NMRPipe and visualized with NMRFAM-SPARKY or POKY. The cross-peak intensities were extracted with either autoFit in NMRPipe or a Voigt fitter. CPMG and CEST profiles were analyzed collectively using ChemEx. The profiles were fitted to a two-state exchange model using the two-step procedure. Briefly, in the first step, residue-specific 15N Rex values were estimated from the CPMG profiles as the difference between the effective R2 values at the minimal and maximal νCPMG frequencies (Rex = R2,eff(min(νCPMG)) – R2,eff(max(νCPMG)). CEST and CPMG profiles of residues with Rex > 5 s-1 were then selected to determine the global exchange parameters with ChemEx. ChemEx allows numerical simulation of the CEST and CPMG pulse sequences with a two-state exchange model. The output includes the global parameters exchange rate kex = kAB + kBA and populations of each state pA and pB = 1 - pA (subscripts A and B stand for state A and B), as well as the site-specific chemical shift differences Δϖ. In the second step, CEST and CPMG profiles of all residues were analyzed with the global parameters kex and p determined in step 1 constrained to obtain Δϖ of each residue. The sign of Δϖ was obtained from CEST and/or HSQC/HMQC experiments. The errors in peak intensities were estimated from replicate planes in CPMG or CEST experiments, which were then propagated through the analysis. Errors in the global exchange parameters and Δϖ were determined from 500 bootstrap replicate simulations.
