Data from: Inoculation with old-growth microbes improves restoration quality and reduces non-native encroachment after seven years
Data files
May 22, 2026 version files 321.73 KB
-
KS_Community_Data_Aug2019_README.rtf
30.52 KB
-
KS_Community_Data_Aug2019.csv
5.28 KB
-
KS_Community_Data_June_2017_README.rtf
30.90 KB
-
KS_Community_Data_June2017.csv
4.95 KB
-
KS_survival_growth_data.xlsx
175.78 KB
-
Metadata_for_KS_Community_Data_Aug2019.xlsx
12.71 KB
-
Metadata_for_KS_Community_Data_June2017.xlsx
12.42 KB
-
Metadata_for_KS_survival_growth_data.xlsx
10.60 KB
-
README.md
20.94 KB
-
TLICover_Data2022_Dryad.csv
13.82 KB
-
TLICover_Data2022_README.txt
3.82 KB
Abstract
Understanding the mechanisms that promote native seedling establishment in disturbed ecosystems is key to improving the biodiversity and function of landscape restorations. Over seven growing seasons, we examined the effects of site preparation technique, soil microbial inoculations, and their interactions on native plant establishment in the restoration of an invaded grassland. Prior to restoration, field plots were either (a) solarized to clear the non-native grass Bromus inermis or (b) mowed, and one of three soil microbial treatments was introduced into each plot using native tallgrass prairie seedlings as ‘nurse’ plants, inoculated with (1) arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi isolated from old-growth prairie remnants, (2) remnant prairie soil, or (3) autoclaved inocula. Uninoculated phytometer seedlings were planted at different distances from the nurse plant row to test for plant-soil feedbacks and the spread of microbes into the restoration site. A diverse native seed mix was applied to test whether site preparation technique and/or microbial inoculations impacted the composition of the plant community. We found that site preparation technique and microbial inoculation were strong drivers of plant community composition, and saw evidence of plant-soil feedbacks in the first year of the study. By the seventh growing season, there was greater cover of late successional native plant species and increased floristic quality index scores in solarized plots and inoculated plots compared to mowed and uninoculated plots. Overseeding without solarization was mostly effective for establishing native grasses, which comprised 66% of plot abundance after three overseeding attempts. By considering belowground communities at the same time as revegetation efforts, this study demonstrates how soil microbial inoculations can be used in conjunction with site preparation technique as a nature-based tool to accelerate the recovery of invaded grasslands.
Dataset DOI: 10.5061/dryad.fqz612k6s
Description of the data and file structure
This file explains the variables in each of the datasets that accompany: Inoculation with old-growth microbes improves restoration quality and reduces non-native encroachment after seven years. Cheeke et al. Ecological Applications.
Files and variables
File: KS_Community_Data_June2017.csv
Description: Plant community data collected in June 2017. Numbers represent percent cover of each plant species in each plot.
Variables
- Date: month and year data were collected
- Block: Block number in field (1-6)
- Plot: plot number in field (1-36)
- PlotType: Site preparation treatment (Brome = mowed, Tarp = solarized)
- Treatment: Microbial inoculation treatment: AMF = arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, WS = whole prairie soil, xControl = uninoculated control
- Inoc: Live = inoculated with AMF or whole prairie soil; NoInoc = xControl
- BouCur: Bouteloua curtipendula
- EchPal: Echinacea pallida
- BapAlb: Baptisia alba
- LiaPyc: Liatris pycnostachya
- ParInt: Parthenium integrifolium
- AndGer: Andropogon geradi
- AscTub: Asclepias tuberosa
- CorLan: Coreopsis lanceolata
- SoiRig: Solidago rigida
- RudSub: Rudbeckia subtomentosa
- SchSco: Schizachyrium scoparium
- SilTer: Silphium terebinthinaceum
- VerHel: Verbesina helianthoides
- MonFis: Monarda fistulosa
- RatPin: Ratibida pinnata
- SilInt: Silphium integrifolium
- SorNut: Sorghastrum nutans
- SymNov: Symphyotrichum novae-angliae
- DesIll: Desmanthus illinoensis
- GriLan: Grindelia lanceolata
- PenDig: Penstemon digitalis
- AscVer: Asclepias verticillata
- ChaFas: Chamaecrista fasciculata
- BidAri: Bidens aristosa
- CorTin: Coreopsis tinctoria
- RudHir: Rudbeckia hirta
- SymPip: Aster paludosus
- VerFas: Veronia fasciculata
- TeuCan: Teucrium canadense
- EriAnn: Erigeron annuus
- SolCan: Solidago canadensis
- AmbArt: Ambrosia artemisiifolia
- ConCan: Conyza canadensis
- VerPer: Veronica peregrina
- AveFaf: Avena fatua
- BroIne: Bromus inermis
- DauCar: Daucus carota
- FesAru: Festuca arundinacea
- Lac: Lactuca sp.
- MelOff: Melilotus officinalis
- PoaPra: Poa pratensis
- PopDel: Populus deltoides
- TraDub: Tragopogon dubius
- TriPra: Trifolium pratense
- UlmAme: Ulmus americana
- Unk1: Unknown aster
- Unk2: Unknown
- Unk3: Unknown grass
File: TLICover_Data2022_Dryad.csv
Description: Plant community data collected in summer 2022.
Variables
- Plot: Unique plot number in field experiment
- Block: Experimental block letter
- Soil: Soil treatment in plot (AMF = arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, Control = uninoculated control, WS = prairie whole soil)
- Prep: Site preparation technique used in plot (Mowed, Solarized)
- Spdiv: Shannon diversity of plant community
- SpdivNat: Shannon diversity of native plant community
- SR: Plant species richness (count)
- nativeSR: native plant species richness (count)
- TotForb: proportion of plant cover consisting of forbs
- TotGrass: proportion of plant cover consisting of grasses
- TotLeg: proportion of plant cover consisting of legumes
- TotNative: proportion of plant cover consisting of native plants
- TotNonNative: proportion of plant cover consisting of non-native plants
- TotDes: proportion of plant cover consisting of planted species
- TotEarly: proportion of plant cover consisting of early-successional species
- TotLate: proportion of plant cover consisting of late-successional species
- meanCwtd: cover-weighted average Coefficient of Conservatism of the plant community
- FQIwtd: cover-weighted Floristic Quality Index of the plant community
- ambart: proportion of Ambrosia artemesiafolia
- andger: proportion of Andropogon gerardii
- apocan: proportion of Apocynum cannabinum
- artlud: proportion of Artemisia ludoviciana var. ludoviciana
- asctub: proportion of Asclepias tuberosa subsp. interior
- ascver: proportion of Asclepias verticillata
- bapalb: proportion of Baptisia alba var. macrophylla
- bidari: proportion of Bidens aristosa
- broine: proportion of Bromus inermis
- chafas: proportion of Chamaecrista fasciculata
- corlan: proportion of Coreopsis lanceolata
- cortin: proportion of Coreopsis tinctoria
- daucar: proportion of Daucus carota
- descan: proportion of Desmodium canadense
- desill: proportion of Desmanthus illinoensis
- echpal: proportion of Echinacea pallida
- eriann: proportion of Erigeron annuus
- eupalt: proportion of Eupatorium altissimum
- gletri: proportion of Gleditsia triacanthos
- helgro: proportion of Helianthus grosseserratus
- helmol: proportion of Helianthus mollis
- lescap: proportion of Lespedeza capitata
- lescun: proportion of Lespedeza cuneata
- lessti: proportion of Kummerowia stipulacea
- liapyc: proportion of Liatris pycnostachya
- monfis: proportion of Monarda fistulosa
- meloff: proportion of Melilotus officinale
- oxastr: proportion of Oxalis stricta
- parint: proportion of Parthenium integrifolium
- pendig: proportion of Penstemon digitalis
- poapra: proportion of Poa pratensis
- popdel: proportion of Populus deltoides
- pycten: proportion of Pycnanthemum tenuifolium
- ratpin: proportion of Ratibida pinnata
- rudhir: proportion of Rudbeckia hirta
- rudsub: proportion of Rudbeckia subtomentosa
- salazu: proportion of Salvia azurea var. grandiflora
- schsco: proportion of Schizachyrium scoparium
- senmar: proportion of Senna marilandica
- setgla: proportion of Setaria glauca
- silint: proportion of Silphium integrifolium var. integrifolium
- silter: proportion of Silphium terebinthinaceum
- solcan: proportion of Solidago canadensis var. hargeri
- solrig: proportion of Oligoneuron rigidum
- solspe: proportion of Solidago speciosa var. rigidiuscula
- sornut: proportion of Sorghastrum nutans
- symnov: proportion of Symphyotrichum novae-angliae
- sympil: proportion of Symphyotrichum pilosum var. pilosum
- tripra: proportion of Trifolium pratense
- ulmus: proportion of Ulmus sp.
- verhel: proportion of Verbesina helianthoides
- zizaur: proportion of Zizia aurea
- persicaria_sp: proportion of Persicaria sp.
File: KS_survival_growth_data.xlsx
Description: Survival and growth data for nurse plant seedlings and uninoculated phytometer seedlings collected from summer 2016 through summer 2019.
Variables
| Column name | Description |
|---|---|
| SilverTag | Unique ID on metal tag at the base of each nurse plant and phytometer in the field |
| GHPlantID | Greenhouse plant ID on plastic stakes before receiving permanent metal tag # |
| Block | Block number in field experiment |
| Plot | Plot number in field experiment |
| Plant | Plant species: Les = Lespedeza capitata, MW = Asclepias tuberosa, EP = Echinacea pallida, LB = Schizachyrium scoparium |
| Type | Type of experimental plant, Nurse plant or Phytometer |
| SoilTreat | Soil Treatment: AMF = arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, WholeSoil = whole prairie soil, xControl = uninoculated control |
| Inoculated | Inoc = inoculated with either AMF or WholeSoil, Uninoc = Control |
| SitePrep | Site preparation technique: Mowed or Solarized |
| Side | Location in plot: Center = nurse plant row in center; Runway = line of 4 uninoculated phytometers; Island = 2 uninoculated phytometers (see Fig. 1) |
| Distance (m) | Distance from nurse plant row (0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, or 2 m); See Fig. 1 |
| Con_Het_specific | Whether the phytometer was conspecific or heterospecific with closest nurse plan |
| InitHt_May16 (cm) | Initial height of each seedling (cm) in May 2016 |
| InitLf_May16 | Initial leaf number of each seedling in May 2026 |
| Survival_June16 | Survival of each seedling in June 2016 |
| Ht_June16 (cm) | Height of each seedling (cm) in June 2016 |
| Survival_Sept16 | Survival of each seedling in September 2016 |
| Ht_Sept16 (cm) | Height of each seedling (cm) in September 2016 |
| Survival_June17 | Survival of each seedling in June 2017 |
| Ht_June17 (cm) | Height of each seedling (cm) in June 2017 |
| Survival_Oct18 | Survival of each seedling in October 2018 |
| Ht Oct18 (cm) | Height of each seedling (cm) in October 2018 |
| Survival_Aug19 | Survival of each seedling in August 2019 |
| Ht Aug19 (cm) | Height of each seedling (cm) in August 2019 |
File: KS_Community_Data_Aug2019.csv
Description: Plant community data collected in August 2019. Numbers represent percent cover of each plant species in each plot.
Variables
-
Date: month and year data were collected
-
Block: Block number in field (1-6)
-
Plot: plot number in field (1-36)
-
PlotType: Site preparation treatment (Brome = mowed, Tarp = solarized)
-
Treatment: Microbial inoculation treatment: AMF = arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, WS = whole prairie soil, xControl = uninoculated control
-
Inoc: Live = inoculated with AMF or whole prairie soil; NoInoc = xControl
PlantCode Plant species AMBART Ambrosia artemisiifolia ANDGER Andropogon geradi APOCAN Apocynum cannabinum ASCSYR Asclepias syriaca ASCTUB Asclepias tuberosa ASCVER Asclepias verticillata BAPALB Baptisia alba BOUCUR Bouteloua curtipendula BROINE Bromus inermis CHAFAS Chamaecrista fasciculata CORLAN Coreopsis lanceolata CORTIN Coreopsis tinctoria CORTRI Coreopsis tripteris DESILL Desmanthus illinoensis ECHPAL Echinacea pallida ELYCAN Elymus canadensis ERIANN Erigeron annuus GAUBIE Gaura biennis GRILAN Grindelia lanceolata HELHEL Heliopsis helianthoides LECUN Lespedeza cuneata LESCAP Lespedeza capitata LIAPYC Liatris pycnostachya MELOFF Melilotus officinalis MONFIS Monarda fistulosa PARINT Parthenium integrifolium PENDIG Penstemon digitalis POAPRA Poa pratensis POPDEL Populus deltoides PYCTEN Pycnanthemum tenuifolium RATPIN Ratibida pinnata RUDHIR Rudbeckia hirta RUDSUB Rudbeckia subtomentosa SCHSCO Schizachyrium scoparium SENMAR Senna marilandica SETPUM Setaria pumila SILINT Silphium integrifolium SILTER Silphium terebinthinaceum SOLCAN Solidago canadensis SOLRIG Solidago rigida SORNUT Sorghastrum nutans SYMNOV Symphyotrichum novae-angliae SYMPIL Symphyotrichum pilosum TRIFLA Tridens flavus TRIPRA Trifolium pratense ULM ulms VERHEL Verbesina helianthoides VERSTR Verbena stricta
File: TLICover_Data2022_README.txt
Description: README file for plant community data collected in summer 2022.
Variables
- This file explains the variables in the summer 2022 dataset that accompany: Inoculation with old-growth microbes improves restoration quality and reduces non-native encroachment after seven years. Cheeke et al. Ecological Applications.
File: Metadata_for_KS_Community_Data_Aug2019.xlsx
Description: This contains the metadata for plant community data collected in August 2019
Variables
- PlantCode: Provides the plant code for each species
- Plant species: Provides the scientific name for each plant species
- Plant Family: Provides the plant family each species is in
- Growth Form: F = forb, G = grass, L = legume, W = woody
- Coefficient of Conservatism score: non-native = 0, native species range from 1-10
- Native: 1 = native plant species, 0 = non-native plant species
- Seeded: 1 = in diverse native seed mix, 0 = not in seed mix
File: KS_Community_Data_Aug2019_README.rtf
Description: README file for plant community data collected in August 2019.
File: Metadata_for_KS_Community_Data_June2017.xlsx
Description: This contains the metadata for plant community data collected in June 2017
Variables
- PlantCode: Provides the plant code for each species
- Plant species: Provides the scientific name for each plant species
- Plant Family: Provides the plant family each species is in
- Growth Form: F = forb, G = grass, L = legume, W = woody
- Coefficient of Conservatism score: non-native = 0, native species range from 1-10
- Native: 1 = native plant species, 0 = non-native plant species
- Seeded: 1 = in diverse native seed mix, 0 = not in seed mix
File: KS_Community_Data_June_2017_README.rtf
Description: README file for plant community data collected in June 2017.
File: Metadata_for_KS_survival_growth_data.xlsx
Description: Metadata descriptions for the column names used in the dataset KS_survival_growth data.xlsx
Variables
| Column name | Description |
|---|---|
| SilverTag | Unique ID on metal tag at the base of each nurse plant and phytometer in the field |
| GHPlantID | Greenhouse plant ID on plastic stakes before receiving permanent metal tag # |
| Block | Block number in field experiment |
| Plot | Plot number in field experiment |
| Plant | Plant species: Les = Lespedeza capitata, MW = Asclepias tuberosa, EP = Echinacea pallida, LB = Schizachyrium scoparium |
| Type | Type of experimental plant, Nurse plant or Phytometer |
| SoilTreat | Soil Treatment: AMF = arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, WholeSoil = whole prairie soil, xControl = uninoculated control |
| Inoculated | Inoc = inoculated with either AMF or WholeSoil, Uninoc = Control |
| SitePrep | Site preparation technique: Mowed or Solarized |
| Side | Location in plot: Center = nurse plant row in center; Runway = line of 4 uninoculated phytometers; Island = 2 uninoculated phytometers (see Fig. 1) |
| Distance (m) | Distance from nurse plant row (0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, or 2 m); See Fig. 1 |
| Con_Het_specific | Whether the phytometer was conspecific or heterospecific with closest nurse plan |
| InitHt_May16 (cm) | Initial height of each seedling (cm) in May 2016 |
| InitLf_May16 | Initial leaf number of each seedling in May 2026 |
| Survival_June16 | Survival of each seedling in June 2016 |
| Ht_June16 (cm) | Height of each seedling (cm) in June 2016 |
| Survival_Sept16 | Survival of each seedling in September 2016 |
| Ht_Sept16 (cm) | Height of each seedling (cm) in September 2016 |
| Survival_June17 | Survival of each seedling in June 2017 |
| Ht_June17 (cm) | Height of each seedling (cm) in June 2017 |
| Survival_Oct18 | Survival of each seedling in October 2018 |
| Ht Oct18 (cm) | Height of each seedling (cm) in October 2018 |
| Survival_Aug19 | Survival of each seedling in August 2019 |
| Ht Aug19 (cm) | Height of each seedling (cm) in August 2019 |
Code/software
Analyses were performed using proc mixed and proc glimmix in SAS and in R (version 4.5.1). R libraries used include: car, vegan, lme4, ggplot2, tidyverse, dplyr, emmeans, ggpubr, phyloseq, devtools, factoextra, ggfortify, flashClust, FactoMineR.
Access information
Other publicly accessible locations of the data:
- NA
Data was derived from the following sources:
- NA
