Data from: Testing for ecological limitation of diversification: a case study using parasitic plants
Data files
Jun 13, 2012 version files 6.92 MB
-
Boraginaceae_partition.txt
158 B
-
Boraginaceae.phy
334.37 KB
-
BoraginaceaeML_SH.tre
3.53 KB
-
Ericales_partition.txt
216 B
-
Ericales.phy
5.96 MB
-
EricalesML_SH.tre
22.47 KB
-
GammaSpot.R
1.08 KB
-
Monotropoideae_Arbutoideae_BEAST.xml
588.06 KB
-
Monotropoideae_Arbutoideae_chrono.tre
6.64 KB
Abstract
Imbalances in phylogenetic diversity could be the result of variable unbounded diversification rates, differing limits on diversity, or a combination of the two. We propose an approach to distinguish between rates and limits as the primary cause of phylogenetic imbalance, using parasitic plants as a model. With sister-taxon comparisons, we show that parasitic plant lineages are typically much less diverse than their autotrophic sisters. We then use age estimates for taxa used in the sister-taxon comparisons to test for correlations between clade age and diversity. We find that parasitic plant diversity is not significantly correlated with the age of the lineage, whereas there is a strong positive correlation between the age and diversity of autotrophic sister lineages. The Ericaceae sister-pair Monotropoideae (parasitic) and Arbutoideae (autotrophic) are sufficiently well samples at the species level to allow more parametric comparisons of diversification patterns. Model-fitting for this group supports ecological limitation in Monotropoideae and unconstrained diversification in Arbutoideae. Thus, differences in diversity between parasitic plants and their autotrophic sisters might be caused by a mixture of ecological limitation and unbounded diversification. A combination of sister-taxon comparisons of diversity and age, coupled with model-fitting of well-sampled phylogenies of focal taxa, provides a powerful test of likely causes of asymmetry in the diversity of lineages.