Data from: Contrasting patterns of land use by resident and migratory bird assemblages in a tropical working landscape
Data files
May 06, 2025 version files 1.39 MB
-
Palenque_Diversity_and_SiteInfo.csv
1.39 MB
-
README.md
2.85 KB
Abstract
The spatial configuration and management of agricultural and other land-use practices can affect ecological assemblages. However, the differences in how resident and migratory birds respond to land use are not well understood, hindering our understanding of bird biodiversity responses to land use. In a tropical moist broadleaf forest landscape of southeastern Mexico, we assessed alpha, beta, and functional diversity as indicators of ecosystem functioning in resident and migratory birds across landscape- and habitat-level gradients, incorporating distance to a protected area, understory vegetation cover, and three land uses: 1) primary forest, 2) secondary forest, and 3) cattle pasture. Compositionally, resident and migratory bird assemblages exhibited similar gradual shifts across land uses. However, while resident bird richness steadily declined with increasing distance from a protected area and simplification of understory vegetation structure, migratory bird richness did not change. Relative to primary forest bird assemblages, we found that migratory bird abundances were greater in secondary forest and cattle pasture, and migratory insectivores compensated for 68% of the abundance losses of resident insectivores in secondary forest and cattle pasture. Among these insectivores in secondary forest and cattle pasture, increases in migratory birds compensated for the abundance declines of resident birds that utilize foliage gleaning and sallying foraging methods. Our findings emphasize the importance of evaluating and managing landscapes around protected areas, highlight the distinct responses of resident and migratory birds to land use, and reveal the mechanisms that sustain ecosystem functions in modified landscapes.
https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.gmsbcc307
Description of the data and file structure
We examined how land use affects resident and migratory bird diversity in a tropical forest landscape in southeastern Mexico. While both bird groups showed similar shifts in composition across land uses, only resident richness declined with habitat simplification and distance from a protected area. Migratory birds, especially insectivores, compensated for declines in resident insectivores in modified habitats, highlighting their role in sustaining ecosystem functions and the need to manage landscapes around protected areas.
Point count surveys for bird diversity data, quadrat sampling for vegetation data, and remote sensing work with Google Earth for broader landscape-level variables.
The dataset consists of a Palenque_Diversity_and_SiteInfo.csv file and the description of each column is described below.
Descriptions of each column:
- Column A: "Rep" -- overall sample repetition number.
- Column B: "habitat" -- broad classification of habitat at each point-count location.
- Column C: "lat" -- latitude in decimal format of each point-count location.
- Column D: "lon" -- longitude in decimal format of each point-count location.
- Column E: "ele" -- elevation in meters of each point-count location.
- Column F: "distPNP" -- distance measurement in meters to the center of the protected area Palenque National Park from each point-count location.
- Column G: "canopy_low" -- proportion of canopy cover of the understory layer, or plants up to 5 meters tall.
- Column H: "canopy_mid" -- proportion of canopy cover of the midstory layer, or plants up to 15 meters tall.
- Column I: "canopy_high" -- proportion of canopy cover of the upperstory layer, or plants up beyond 16 meters tall.
- Column J: "water" -- proportion of ground cover made up of water bodies, such as creeks, ponds, and flooded fields.
- Column K: "impervious" -- proportion of ground cover made up of mainly concrete surfaces.
- Column L: "bare" -- proportion of ground cover made up of bare soil.
- Column M: "leaf_litter" -- proportion of ground cover made up of dead leaves.
- Column N: "grass" -- proportion of ground cover made up of grass.
- Column O: "understory_plant" -- proportion of ground cover made up of understory plants, usually herbaceous plants.
- Column P: "Region.Label" -- Naming system for the point count locations.
- Column Q: "Month" -- Month for each point count sample.
- Column R: "Day" -- Day for each point count sample.
- Column S: "Year" -- Year for each point count sample.
- Column T-JG: Diversity data across all samples for each bird species detected, using common names.
