Data from: Cut through the noise: Vocal signals and auditory processing vary along an urbanization gradient in Pacific treefrogs
Data files
Sep 03, 2026 version files 2.16 MB
-
ABR_Thresholds.csv
157.70 KB
-
Call_Properties.csv
57.17 KB
-
README.md
5.90 KB
-
Spectrum_Levels_ALL.csv
1.94 MB
Abstract
Increasing levels of sensory pollutants in human-altered environments are affecting how animals communicate. In animals that communicate acoustically, several studies have uncovered how vocal signals and signaling behaviors change in ways that enhance the signal-to-noise ratio with increasing levels of anthropogenic noise. Surprisingly, little is known about whether and how sensory-processing mechanisms in the receivers also change in urban soundscapes. We asked whether vocal signals, hearing sensitivity, and the ability to extract signals from noise of Pacific treefrogs (Pseudacris regilla) vary in ways that facilitate communication among sites with different levels of urbanization and noise. We obtained hourly recordings of the soundscapes and show that noise levels between 0.25 and 4.0 kHz vary among sites both during and outside of the breeding season of Pacific treefrogs. Analyses of focal male recordings reveal that properties of their mating calls show negligible differences in ways that could improve the signal-to-noise ratio among sites. Auditory brainstem responses obtained in the presence and absence of noise reveal that, at frequencies present in the vocalizations, subjects from urbanized and noisy sites are less sensitive and experience reduced masking. Our results suggest that lower auditory sensitivity may function as a gain-reduction mechanism that improves the signal-to-noise ratio in sites with high levels of ambient noise.
Dataset DOI: 10.5061/dryad.hqbzkh1zk
Description of the data and file structure
To understand how urbanization and increasing levels of noise may influence vocal signals and auditory processing, we (1) characterized the soundscape of eight breeding sites of Pacific treefrogs along an urban gradient at the San Francisco Bay Area in California, USA, (2) compared physical properties of the advertisement call produced by males at these sites, and (3) compared hearing abilities of males and females from these breeding sites. To characterize the soundscape of our field sites, we obtained hourly recordings of the soundscape with calibrated autonomous recording units (ARUs) for 27 days during the breeding season and 28 days outside of the breeding season. We obtained digital recordings of the advertisement calls produced by focal Pacific treefrog males at each site and used Raven Pro v 1.5 to measure temporal and spectral properties of the calls. We obtained auditory brainstem responses in the presence and absence of noise to measure absolute and masked auditory thresholds at different sound frequencies of Pacific treefrogs collected at each site.
Files and variables
File: ABR_Thresholds.csv
Description: Main dataset for Auditory Brainstem Response (ABR) thresholds obtained using a visual detection method in the absence and presence of Gaussian broadband noise broadcast at two spectrum levels: 25 dB/Hz and 31 dB/Hz. Empty cells represent data not available.
Variables
- ID: Subject ID
- Year: Year in which the subject was tested
- Date: Date in which the subject was tested
- Site: Name (abv) of the field site where the subject was collected
- EBMUD = Pond at East Bay Municipal District
- HotelPonds = Pond on Stanford Property
- LawlerRanch = Pond at Lawler Ranch, Stanford Property
- MoriPoint = Pond at Mori Point Park
- PointReyes = Pond at Point Reyes National Sea Shore
- Presidio = Pond at Presidio of San Francisco
- RodeoBeach = Pond by Rodeo Beach in Golden Gate Recreational Area
- SFO = Pond at San Francisco International Airport property
- Tester: Name of person who tested the subject
- Sex: Subject's sex
- SVL: Subject's snout to vent length in mm
- SVL_Cent: Mean-centered SVL
- Mass: Subject's mass in g
- Freq: Frequency of the stimulus for obtaining the ABR
- AGRAM: ABR Threshold in the absence of noise
- Noise.0.3: ABR Threshold in the presence of broadband noise at a spectrum level of 25 dB/Hz
- Noise.0.6: ABR Threshold in the presence of broadband noise at a spectrum level of 31 dB/Hz
File: Call_Properties.csv
Description: This is the main dataset for call properties. Each row contains data for one call. Empty cells represent data not available.
Variables
- File_Name: Name of the file of the recording of the focal male
- Location: Name (abv) of field site
- EBMUD = Pond at East Bay Municipal District
- HOTEL = Pond on Stanford Property
- LAWLER = Pond at Lawler Ranch, Stanford Property
- MORI = Pond at Mori Point Park
- PORE = Pond at Point Reyes National Sea Shore
- PRESIDIO = Pond at Presidio of San Francisco
- RODEO = Pond by Rodeo Beach in Golden Gate Recreational Area
- SFO = Pond at San Francisco International Airport property
- Date: Date in which the recording was obtained
- SVL: Subject's snout to vent length in mm
- Mass: Subject's mass in g
- Calling_from: Substrate where the male was calling from
- Temp_Analysis: Temperature used for analyses (°C); based on where the male was calling from
- Air_Temp: Air temperature in degrees C at the calling location
- Water_Temp: Water temperature in degrees C at the calling location
- Wet_Bulb: Wet bulb air temperature (°C)
- Call_Duration: Call duration in s
- Pulses_P1: Number of pulses in the first phase of the call
- Pulses_P2: Nunmber of pulses in the second phase of the call
- Dom_Freq_2048: Dominant frequency of the call in Hz
- Call_Period: Time in s between the onset of the call, and the onset of the following call
- Call_Rate: Instantaneous call rate in calls/s
File: Spectrum_Levels_ALL.csv
Description: This is the main data file for cosinor analyses. Each row contains the spectrum levels (linear and logarithmic) for each frequency (0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, and 4.0 kHz) for each 15-min recording obtained with the Automated Recording Units. Recordings were obtained every hour at the hour. Empty cells represent data not available.
Variables
- FileName: Name of the file of the recording
- Site: Name (abv) of field site
- Season: During (INSEASON) or outside (OUTSEASON) of the breeding season
- Date: Date of the recording
- DOY: Julian day of the year
- Time: he time (0-23) at which the 15-minute soundscape recording was obtained
- SL_250_Log: Spectrum Level at 0.25 kHz in logarithmic scale
- SL_500_Log: Spectrum Level at 0.5 kHz in logarithmic scale
- SL_1000_Log: Spectrum Level at 1.0 kHz in logarithmic scale
- SL_2000_Log: Spectrum Level at 2.0 kHz in logarithmic scale
- SL_4000_Log: Spectrum Level at 4.0 kHz in logarithmic scale
- SL_250_Lin: Spectrum Level at 0.25 kHz in linear scale
- SL_500_Lin: Spectrum Level at 0.5 kHz in linear scale
- SL_1000_Lin: Spectrum Level at 1.0 kHz in linear scale
- SL_2000_Lin: Spectrum Level at 2.0 kHz in linear scale
- SL_4000_Lin: Spectrum Level at 4.0 kHz in linear scale
Code/software
All data are visualized in Excel and imported into R for analyses.
Access information
Other publicly accessible locations of the data:
- Additional information can be found in the associated research article
Data was derived from the following sources:
- Field and lab measurements
