Detection locations of fisher (Pekania pennanti) in Connecticut, USA 2018-2023
Data files
Feb 11, 2026 version files 13.65 KB
-
README.md
895 B
-
Table_S3.xlsx
12.75 KB
Abstract
Many mustelids share a history of population decline in North America after European settlement followed by a period of restoration and recovery. Relative to their past, mustelids now are perceived to be common and widespread. However, the local conservation status of many mustelids challenges this perception. Fishers (Pekania pennanti) in Connecticut were considered abundant prior to the initiation of an annual trapping season in 2005, but indices of relative abundance decreased over the last 18 years, particularly in western Connecticut. We collected detection data from camera surveys in winter (December-April) in 5 km2 units (n = 59 units, 354 cameras) throughout Connecticut between 2018 and 2023 to verify management concerns and contribute to an updated conservation assessment of fisher in the state. We applied an occupancy modeling framework to the detection data emphasizing regional comparisons in occupancy, detection-rate, and model-based density. We detected fishers across Connecticut except in the southwestern part of the state, but the area occupied was small (88 km2). The model-based density estimate (λ) was much lower in Connecticut compared to an abundant fisher population in southern Vermont, and lower in western Connecticut compared to east. Region was the best-supported covariate on occupancy in our single season model and parameter estimates (ψ, p) from top models were greater in eastern Connecticut compared to west. Fishers did not show spatial segregation from other carnivores in the study but did exhibit temporal separation in daily activity patterns with other carnivores. Our results support management concerns for the conservation status of fisher in Connecticut, particularly in the western part of the state. The relative abundance of fisher appears low based on all metrics and a short-term closure or reduction in length of the trapping season in western Connecticut could benefit the recovery of fisher. Harvest data and other sighting metrics may be insufficient to fully assess the conservation status of mustelids like fisher. Therefore, we recommend implementing a long-term monitoring program to provide current distribution data for fisher. Future studies should focus on understanding the impacts of anticoagulant rodenticides and canine distemper on the current decline of fisher in Connecticut.
Dataset DOI: 10.5061/dryad.j9kd51ct3
Description of the data and file structure
Camera detection data for fisher collected during 3, 5-day surveys at sites throughout Connecticut.
Files and variables
File: Table_S3.xlsx
Description: Camera detection data for fisher collected during 3, 5-day surveys at sites throughout Connecticut
Variables
- Species = fisher (Pekania pennanti)
- Country = United States
- State = Connecticut
- UTM = Zone 18 or 19
- X and Y = coordinates
Code/software
Coordinates can be uploaded and visualized in ArcPro (ESRI) or Google Earth as example programs.
Access information
Other publicly accessible locations of the data:
- Source publication
Data was derived from the following sources:
- N/A
