Skip to main content
Dryad

Legacy effects of livestock grazing on vegetation of an arid landscape exist more than 30 years after livestock were excluded

Data files

Mar 21, 2026 version files 401.67 KB

Click names to download individual files

Abstract

Introduction: Globally, livestock grazing is key driver of vegetation degradation in arid rangelands. This degradation tends to be most severe near artificial water points which are focal points for livestock activity. Conservation reserves have been established on former rangelands, however, the timeframes for vegetation recovery following the cessation of livestock grazing are poorly understood. 

Objectives: To assess changes in rangeland vegetation structure and composition following long term herbivore exclusion to inform understanding of the timeframes required for rangeland vegetation recovery. 

Methods: We quantified recovery of vegetation following the removal of livestock in an Australian arid rangeland by comparing vegetation structure and composition inside and outside of herbivore exclosures that had been established for 36 years and were situated along gradients of distance from water. 

Results: Inside of long-term exclosures, vegetation cover was higher and taller and forb density was higher than in unfenced control plots. Inside exclosures, annual species richness was higher but did not respond to distance from water. Perennial species richness did not respond to herbivore exclusion but increased with distance from water both inside and outside of exclosures.  

Conclusions: After 36 years of livestock exclusion, vegetation recovery occurred structurally but floristically, recovery was mainly represented by short-lived annual species. That the richness of perennial species inside of herbivore exclusion increased with increasing distance from water suggests that the composition of perennial plant species was a legacy of the effects that water-focused livestock grazing had on vegetation when the plots were established 36 years previously.

Implications for practice: Following livestock removal, timeframes for vegetation recovery may vary depending on the indicator used. Changes in ground layer structure, community composition and abundance of annuals may be observed within a decade, however, recovery of slow growing perennials may occur over multiple decades. A key implication of this study is that the progress of full passive recovery in arid plant communities following livestock removal should, at the minimum, be expressed in the order of decades. Active recovery approaches such as direct seeding or out-planting may be required to enhance the rate of recovery of perennial plants following the livestock removal.