Data from: Global impacts of agricultural and timber plantations on dung beetle biodiversity
Data files
Mar 19, 2026 version files 45.47 KB
-
Metadata_dung_beetles.csv
42.20 KB
-
README.md
3.27 KB
Abstract
The ongoing conversion of natural forests to timber and agricultural plantations has driven rapid biodiversity loss. It is crucial to assess the remaining ecological value of these production areas and to examine how their management and location influence this value. This study aims to determine the pattern of effects resulting from the conversion of natural forests to agricultural and timber plantations on invertebrates, using dung beetles as a crucial bioindicator group that performs essential ecological functions. We conducted a comprehensive global meta-analysis, using 109 published articles yielding 444 effect sizes to assess dung beetle species richness and abundance in various types of plantations, including annual crops, cocoa, coffee, forestry, oil palm, and rubber. We examined whether the response varied based on plantation management characteristics (origin, connectivity to natural forest, size) or geographic location (zoogeographical region, biodiversity hotspot). Our findings indicated overall negative impacts on dung beetle species richness and abundance, with these effects more pronounced in oil palm and rubber plantations. The severity of impacts was greater in agricultural plantations that utilized species outside their natural distribution range, isolated from natural forests, and implemented over large areas. These effects were pronounced particularly in the Neotropical and Oriental regions. In vulnerable areas, protecting natural forests can help to reduce biodiversity loss. When economic and social contexts, such as in the Neotropical and Oriental regions, hinder conservation strategies, establishing small-scale plantations of native, structurally diverse species connected to remaining forests may enhance dung beetle diversity, likely reflecting more favourable microclimates and food resources.
This README was generated on 2026-03-17 by Pablo A. López Bedoya
GENERAL INFORMATION
-
Title of Dataset
-
Author Information
Corresponding Investigator Name: Pablo A. López-Bedoya
Institution: Programa de Pós graduação em Ecologia Aplicada, Departamento de Ecologia e Conservação, Universidade Federal de Lavras, Lavras, MG, Brazil.
Email: pablo.lobe19@gmail.comCo-investigator 1
Name: David P. Edwards
Institution: Department of Plant Sciences and Centre for Global Wood Security, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EA, UK.Co-investigator 2
Name: Felicity A. Edwards
Institution: RSPB Centre for Conservation Science, RSPB, Cambridge, UK.Co-investigator 3
Name: Cesar M. A. Correa
Institution: Universidade Estadual de Mato Grosso do Sul, Laboratório de Bioecologia de Scarabaeoidea (Scaralab), Aquidauana 79200-000, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil.Co-investigator 4
Name: Julio Louzada
Institution: Departamento de Ecologia e Conservação, Universidade Federal de Lavras, Lavras, Brazil.Co-investigator 5
Name: Jorge A. Noriega
Institution: Grupo de Agua, Salud y Ambiente, Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad El Bosque, Bogotá, Colombia. -
Date of data collection: 1900-2025
-
Geographic location of data collection: Globally
-
Funding sources that supported the collection of the data: Natural Environment Research Council (grant no. NE/R017441/1)
Brazil’s National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) (408430/2024-9). -
Recommended citation for this dataset: López-Bedoya, P.A., Edwards, D.P., Edwars,F.A., Correa, C.M.A., Louzada, J., & Noriega, J.A. (2026). Data from: Global impacts of agricultural and timber plantations on dung beetle biodiversity. Dryad Digital Repository. https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.jq2bvq8qm
DATA & FILE OVERVIEW
- Description of dataset: Metadata_dung_beetles.csv
Summary of the case studies for species richness and abundance of dung beetles used in the meta-analysis. Detailing authors, metric used, plantation type, origin, landscape, size, context, region, and hotspot. Some references provided more than one case study, referred to different sampling locations or different sampling time, which were considered as independent cases. Hedges and variance values are reported.
DATA-SPECIFIC INFORMATION
- Moderador Variable List
Authors
Metric: Richness or Abundance.
Type: forestry, cocoa, coffee, oil palm, rubber, anual crops.
Origin: Native, Exotic, or Na.
Landscape: Connected, Isolated, or Na.
Size: Large, Small, or Na.
Context: Island or Mainland.
Region: Afrotropical, Australasia, Nearctic, Neotropical, Oriental, Palearctic.
Hotspot: Inside or Outside. - Response variable list
Hedges and variance values. - Abbreviations used
Na = Data not available
Some studies did not provide specific information on certain moderador variables. This occurs when the methods section of the article does not describe the habitats assessed in sufficient detail.
