Data from: Abundant and morphologically large birds underpin top-down control in rewired trophic networks of restored forests
Data files
Jun 03, 2026 version files 275.46 KB
-
1.Plantations_interaction_network.csv
35.72 KB
-
2.Secondary_forests_interaction_network.csv
48.24 KB
-
3.Primary_forests_interaction_network.csv
36.56 KB
-
4.Mist-net_survey_and_faeces_sampling.csv
60.46 KB
-
5.Checklist_of_arthropod_prey.csv
88.80 KB
-
README.md
5.67 KB
Abstract
Forest restoration is rapidly transforming landscapes worldwide and is expected to restore associated ecosystem services. However, the complex trophic interactions that underpin forest ecosystem integrity remain poorly understood, especially where the reconfiguration or loss of core predators can trigger cascading top-down effects, despite increasing emphasis on process-based conservation.
Using fecal DNA metabarcoding of 494 samples from 44 bird species, we reconstructed 2,282 unique bird-arthropod trophic interactions. We compared network structure among plantations, secondary and primary forests, partitioned network dissimilarity into interaction rewiring and species turnover relative to primary forests, tested how species characteristics and rewiring probability shape species’ role reconfiguration, and evaluated the functional robustness of avian top-down control under characteristic-driven extinctions.
Plantations exhibited higher connectance than secondary forests, whereas nestedness and modularity did not differ among forest types. The network dissimilarity was primarily driven by interaction rewiring, which reshaped the network structure by lowering the connectance in plantations but increasing the modularity in secondary forests. Species’ roles were differentially reconfigured between restored forests through contrasting mechanisms, with the effects of abundance dominated in plantations, whereas abundance together with the rewiring probability of morphologically large birds shaped core roles in secondary forests.
The functional robustness of bird top-down control on herbivorous insects was especially fragile to the simulated loss of abundant species in plantations, while the loss of morphologically large birds consistently weakened the robustness across all forest types.
Synthesis and applications: As restoration increasingly reshapes terrestrial food webs, our findings highlight the importance of incorporating trophic roles that underpin avian ecosystem services such as top-down control. Although forest restoration can rebuild trophic network structure, different restoration strategies reconfigure species’ roles through distinct characteristic-driven mechanisms, with asymmetric functional consequences. Restoration success should therefore be enhanced by emphasizing the protection of abundant and large birds, while prioritizing mixed vegetation structure and well-connected forest patches to promote the persistence or recolonization of functionally important avian predators.
https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.mkkwh71g8
Description of the Data and File Structure
File name: 1.Plantations_interaction_network.csv
File name: 2.Secondary_forests_interaction_network.csv
File name: 3.Primary_forests_interaction_network.csv
These datasets provide bird–arthropod bipartite trophic interaction matrices, each corresponding to a specific forest type:
Plantations_interaction_network: representing plantations.
Secondary_forests_interaction_network: representing secondary forests.
Primary_forests_interaction_network: representing primary forests.
Each matrix captures the trophic interactions observed within its respective habitat, allowing comparative analyses under forest restoration. Each matrix represents the arthropods in rows and their predators(avian) in columns. Each cell in the matrix represents the detection counts by each bird species. These matrices collectively describe the structure and strength of trophic interactions within each forest type.
Note: For detailed taxonomic information of birds (Family name, English name, Latin name) and a key to bird species acronyms, users should refer to the file "4.Mist-net_survey_and_faeces_sampling".
File name: 4.Mist-net_survey_and_faeces_sampling.csv
This dataset contains bird faecal sampling records collected across different forest types. It provides detailed information on sampled bird individuals, including their taxonomic identity, sampling location, and survey metadata. The dataset is organized as a single data frame comprising 494 observations and 10 variables. Each row represents one sampled bird individual associated with a faecal sample.
| Variable | Description |
| Faeces ID | Unique identifier for each faecal sample, corresponding to an individual bird |
| Forest types | Forest category where sampling occurred (e.g., plantation, secondary forest, primary forest) |
| Station | Code representing the broader sampling area or station |
| Site.ID | Unique code for each of the 27 sampling sites |
| date | Date of the survey, YY/MM/DD |
| Family name | Taxonomic family of the bird species |
| English name | Common English name of the bird species |
| Latin name | Scientific name of the bird species |
| Species code | Species acronyms used across datasets |
| Marking ID | Unique banding or marking identifier for each individual bird |
File name: 5.Checklist_of_arthropod_prey.csv
This dataset provides taxonomic information and trophic category of arthropods, intended to support ecological analyses of trophic interactions and biodiversity patterns. It includes hierarchical taxonomic levels from class to species, along with trophic categorization at family-level. The dataset is organized as a single data frame comprising 1,159 observations and 6 variables. Each row represents a unique arthropod taxon identified in the study.
| Variable | Description
| Class | Taxonomic class of the arthropod |
| Order | Taxonomic order of the arthropod |
| Family | Taxonomic family of the arthropod |
| Genus | Taxonomic genus of the arthropod |
| Species | Species name |
| Category | Trophic category of the arthropod (i.e., Predatory, Herbivorous, Detritivorous, and Omnivorous) |
Referencing Additional Information: For detailed insights into the species and parcel characteristics, users are encouraged to refer to the associated article by Zhang et al. (2026) in the Journal of Applied Ecology. The article serves as a comprehensive guide, providing context, methodologies, and additional details that enhance the interpretation and utilization of the dataset.
We conducted extensive field sampling of avian communities and used fecal DNA metabarcoding to reconstruct bird-arthropod trophic interactions in a restored forest ecosystem in northwestern China.
