Data from: Digging into dirt: Rewilding with threatened mammals shapes soil insect assemblages
Data files
May 09, 2026 version files 1.04 MB
-
Dig_rich_abund_25-Apr-26.csv
2.03 KB
-
Observations_mainfile_24Apr26.csv
418.97 KB
-
README.md
2.56 KB
-
Traits_25Apr-26.csv
19.21 KB
-
Treatment_metadata_25-Apr-26.csv
2.32 KB
-
Trophic-weight_24-Apr-26.csv
595 KB
Abstract
Digging mammals function as ecosystem engineers by altering soil structure, influencing nutrient cycling, and shaping vegetation communities. The widespread decline of these taxa globally, driven by habitat loss and introduced predators, has triggered cascading ecological effects, yet the consequences for soil-dwelling insect communities remain poorly understood. Insects, many of which have subterranean larval stages, provide essential functions such as pollination, decomposition and nutrient cycling, making them ideal indicators for evaluating the restructuring of ecological communities following mammal reintroductions. Here, we used data from a long-term experimental mammal exclusion study within a predator-free sanctuary (Scotia Wildlife Sanctuary) in southeastern Australia to test how the reintroduction of digging mammals affects the structure and composition of insect communities emerging from soil. We sampled insects using emergence traps across replicated plots of mammal reintroduction, exclusion, and procedural control in 2010 and in 2018, 8 years after fence installation. While variation in digging activity (indexed by pit density) did not significantly affect richness or biomass of soil-emerging insect taxa, areas with digging showed reduced insect abundance. Hierarchical modelling of taxa communities revealed that parasitoid wasps (Hymenoptera) and predatory robber flies (Diptera: Asilidae) were strongly associated with plots without digging activity, likely reflecting sensitivity to direct predation or nest disturbance. No herbivorous beetle taxa showed a statistically supported association with treatment, indicating that negative associations with digging activity were restricted to specific parasitoids and predatory groups, rather than representing a consistent trophic-wide response. Our findings therefore indicate that the reintroduction of ecosystem engineers alters insect assemblages, potentially cascading through to multitrophic interactions and ecosystem functioning. This is important because it: 1) suggests there may have been profound effects of the widespread loss of ecosystem engineers on ecosystems across the Australian continent; and 2) highlights that whole-of-ecosystem knowledge is critical to getting rewilding right. We emphasise the importance of thorough, long-term ecological monitoring of invertebrate assemblages to inform mammal reintroduction and restoration efforts, ensuring they align with broader ecosystem management objectives.
Dataset DOI: 10.5061/dryad.n02v6wxcm
Description of the data and file structure
README
- Dataset: Digging into dirt: rewilding with threatened mammals shapes soil-emerging
- Location: Scotia Wildlife Sanctuary, NSW, Australia
- Years: 2010 and 2018
OVERVIEW
This dataset contains insect emergence data collected to assess the effects of mammal exclusion and reintroduction on soil-emerging insect communities.
FILES
Observations_mainfile_24Apr26.csv
Individual-level dataset. Each row represents a single insect collected from an emergence trap. Includes sampling metadata (year, site, plot, treatment, trap), taxonomy, morphospecies ID, body measurements, and estimated biomass.
Traits_25Apr-26.csv
Lookup table assigning ecological traits to each morphospecies, including trophic guild (adult and larval), prey/host associations, habitat, and body size range.
Trophic-weight_24-Apr-26.csv
Supplementary dataset used to assign trophic classifications and weight estimates. Includes additional taxonomic detail and trophic information.
Dig_rich_abund_25-Apr-26.csv
Plot-level summary dataset including total insect abundance, taxonomic richness, and digging intensity (pits per hectare).
Treatment_metadata_25-Apr-26.csv
Metadata describing plot-level treatment assignments (Control, Exclusion, Procedural Control) and experimental stage.
KEY VARIABLES
- year – sampling year (2010 or 2018)
- site – site block identifier
- plot – plot identifier
- treatment – treatment group (Control, Exclusion, Procedural Control)
- stage – experimental stage
- trap – emergence trap ID
- order, family, genus, species – taxonomic classification (where available)
- morph_spp – morphospecies identifier used in analyses
- length_mm – body length (mm)
- width_mm – body width (mm)
- biomass_g – estimated body mass (g), calculated from length and width using an allometric equation (see manuscript Methods)
NOTES
Taxonomic resolution varies among specimens. Analyses were conducted at the morphospecies level (morph_spp), which represents the most consistent unit across the dataset.
Trait data are assigned at the family or morphospecies level and represent generalised ecological roles based on published literature and expert knowledge.
Missing values (blank cells) are present where taxonomic or trait information was not available.
