Data from: Preference-performance relationship in the thistle tortoise beetle: Implications for its realised host range
Data files
Jul 31, 2026 version files 33.27 KB
-
Cassida_PPH_Ecol_Ent_26-0077-EEN_RawData_July_2026.xlsx
29.67 KB
-
README.md
3.60 KB
Abstract
The evolutionary constraints on host plant preferences of herbivorous insects are a question of theoretical and practical importance. Since larvae have limited mobility, natural selection pressures should promote host plant choices by adults that optimise larval survival. Such optimal host utilisation is predicted to reinforce the evolution of specialisation. This concept is expressed and tested as the ‘preference-performance hypothesis’ (PPH), which predicts a positive relationship between adult preference and larval performance. Through a series of choice and no-choice experiments, the preference-performance relationship was examined for the oligophagous tortoise beetle, Cassida rubiginosa, used for biocontrol of thistle weeds. It was hypothesised that adult host plant choices based on olfaction, final location, feeding intensity, and oviposition are adaptive and reflect the optimal hosts for larval performance (survival). In accordance with the PPH, there was a positive relationship between all measures of adult preference and larval performance. Adult preference based on olfactometer experiments showed a significant, but weak correlation, explaining 27.6% of the variation in larval survival. The strongest correlation was found for adult preference measured as the amount of feeding, explaining 72.5% of the variation in larval survival. Adult preference based on location at the end of the experiment showed a similarly strong correlation, explaining 69.4% of the variation in larval survival. Adult preference based on oviposition and the number of hatched larvae were moderately correlated with larval survival, explaining 46.8% and 48.7% of larval survival, respectively. While there is a significant positive relationship between preference and performance, adult host preference is only a moderate predictor of larval performance. The adult beetle showed substantial flexibility in host plant selection, and equal performance across most Cardueae hosts. This is likely due to the larvae being more sensitive to physical and chemical defences, and possibly an evolutionary lag in the host range between the life stages. Any expansion of the realised host range will be limited by the ability of the larva to adapt to suboptimal hosts.
Dataset DOI: 10.5061/dryad.n5tb2rcbn
Description of the data and file structure
Data were collected from experiments described in the publications below. The data from these experiments were analysed to test the preference-performance hypothesis (PPH) for the thistle tortoise beetle, Cassida rubiginosa.
Cripps, M.G., Jackman, S.D., Roquet, C., van Koten, C., Rostás, M., Bourdôt, G.W., & Susanna, A. (2016) Evolution of specialization of Cassida rubiginosa on Cirsium arvense (Compositae, Cardueae). Frontiers in Plant Science, 7, 1261.
Hettiarachchi, D.K., Rostás, M., Sullivan, J.J., Jackman, S., van Koten, C., & Cripps, M.G. (2023) Plant phylogeny determines host selection and acceptance of the oligophagous leaf beetle Cassida rubiginosa. Pest Management Science, 79, 4694-4703.
Files and variables
File: Cassida_PPH_Ecol_Ent_26-0077-EEN_RawData_July_2026.xlsx
Description: This file contains the raw data from five different experiments, each in a separate data sheet. 1) Larval Performance, 2) No choice olfactometer, 3) Choice olfactometer, 4) Choice adult preference, 5) No choice adult performance 6)Species code: Species code and their respective names
1) Larval Performance Variables
- Rep: Replicate (1 to 5) of independent potted plants.
- Plant species: Each of the 16 different test plant species (see 'species codes' sheet for names).
- Total: The total number of neonate larvae applied to each potted plant (12 per plant).
- Adult: Number of adults
- Percent Survival: The percentage of larvae that survived from neonate to adult.
2) No choice olfactometer
- Rep: Replicate (1 to 10) for each independent olfactometer test.
- Plant species: Each of the 16 different test plant species (see 'species codes' sheet for names).
- Leaf: the number of adult beetles that chose the 'Leaf' chamber of the olfactometer.
- Cotton: the number of adult beetles that chose the 'Cotton' chamber of the olfactometer.
3) Choice olfactometer
- Rep: Replicate (1 to 10) for each independent olfactometer test.
- Plant species: Each of the 15 different test plant species (see 'species codes' sheet for names).
- Test species: number of test species involved
- CA: Cirsium arvense, the primary host plant tested against each of the 15 different test plant species.
4) Choice adult preference
- Test combination: The number (1 to 15) of different independent pair-wise tests of a plant species vs CA (Cirsium arvense).
- Plant species: Each of the different test plant species (see 'species codes' sheet for names).
- Rep: Replicate (1 to 10) for each independent pair-wise test of a plant species vs CA (Cirsium arvense)
- Eggs: The number of egg masses laid per plant.
- Feeding: The number of feeding holes per plant.
- Location: The number of beetles per plant at the end of the experiment.
5) No choice adult performance
- Rep: Replicate (1 to 4) for each independent potted plant.
- Plant species: Each of the 16 different test plant species (see 'species codes' sheet for names).
- Feeding holes: Total number of feeding holes per plant.
- Eggs per female: Number of egg masses per female beetle per plant.
- Larvae per female: Number of larvae that hatched from egg masses per female beetle per plant.
NA = Missing values
