Skip to main content
Dryad

Data supporting the study: Multiple dating methods and insights from the fossil record reveal that bark beetles predate the angiosperm terrestrial revolution

Data files

Mar 19, 2026 version files 53.31 MB

Click names to download individual files

Abstract

Estimating the time origin of a given clade is not trivial. Most dating studies rely on a node dating approach, which is highly sensitive to fossil placement uncertainties. A perfect example of that can be found in bark beetles (Curculionidae: Scolytinae). Molecular dating of the subfamily has mostly been anchored to a single fossil, Cylindrobrotus pectinatus (125.77–121.4 Ma). Although this fossil is often used as a calibration point on the stem node of the subfamily, its phylogenetic position has never been rigorously tested through formal analyses, casting uncertainty over previous estimates. Here, we rely on total-evidence dating, integrating morphological and molecular data along with 19 well-preserved scolytine fossils, to refine the divergence time estimates of the subfamily. We additionally used a traditional node dating approach, as well as the Bayesian Brownian Bridge model, to independently analyze species-level fossil occurrences of Scolytinae and compared our results. Under the same priors and with C. pectinatus included, the Bayesian Brownian Bridge produced ages in line with those of total-evidence dating. However, when C. pectinatus is excluded, ages are later of about ~100 Ma than in total-evidence dating and node dating analyses. In our case, total-evidence with different clock parameters for each gene and the morphological data, appeared more appropriate than node dating for estimating the age of Scolytinae when using a phylogenetic framework. Additionally, our results suggest that C. pectinatus is more closely related to Dryocoetini s. l. or Ipini–Dryocoetini s. l. clades rather than being a stem lineage of Scolytinae. Across all analyses, when C. pectinatus is considered inside the subfamily, Scolytinae are constantly inferred to have originated at least 131.2 Ma, predating the Angiosperm Terrestrial Revolution. These results highlight the importance of integrating multiple dating approaches to mitigate biases inherent to any single method, ultimately leading to more reliable divergence estimates.